by theluckycountry » Mon 02 Dec 2024, 03:03:18
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', 'I')'d love if the goldbugs in this forum had a look at my thoughts on money on my blog and made their comments.
I went the trouble but the comment didn't pass moderation? I'll repost my thoughts on the essay here instead.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') very well put together article and far too broad for me to comment on in it's entirety so I will just share my thought on money, the thing that makes the world go round.
It's certainly true that those who control the modern flows of money also control the media and education system and hence we will typically learn what they want us to learn so they can achieve their goals. What they want is a system that enriches themselves further. In a way it's no different to Coke-a-cola running its ads to persuade people to drink coke so their profits can increase. If you convince everyone they need a CC to live (which you don't) then you have an incredible source of new revenue coming in at high interest rates. You have "leveled up" so to speak. Do the same with car loans and then student debt, telling the population that's it's smart. That in the end they will be more prosperous for it.
You're concept of zero-valued money is quite an abstraction, in terms, and I find it a little hard to get my head around. To my mind there are basically just two forms of money, the one you own and the one you don't. Cash in the bank is clearly owned by the bank, their articles explain this. It's an unsecured loan you make to the bank. If I owned this money I would have no problem getting it back, the courts would side with me, not the bank as they do in a bank failure.
Shares are thought of as money, but again, not the type you own. Changes to the legal arrangement over the past couple of decades has made the buyers of shares beneficial owners not legal owners. The brokerages who hold them, in digital clearing-houses, are in fact the legal owners and can do what they please with them. In the good times they let you sell them and realize the value but in a market collapse they can sell them or swap them with anyone for any thing, as legal owners have the right to. Of course they would not do this without sanction but in the interests of the nation, converting them into US Bonds say and giving the Government control over the corporations. Actually anything is possible in extremis, look at 1933.
Even banknotes under the mattress are not really your money, they belong to the government that printed them and can be recalled at anytime, or have their value modified at anytime. Here I use the definition of money as something that has or is a store of value, i.e.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')"Store of value is an asset that can retain its purchasing power into the future and can be retrieved to be used again at a later time. Money has a store of value because it is an asset that can be invested, stored in a bank, left in a safe at home, and then later used to purchase something in the future."
Now if the printed/digital currency can be devalued radically overnight by those that created it how is it a store of value? Simply put, it isn't. So the paper currency we all use is Money, until it isn't, if that makes any sense. Obviously I don't fully agree with the paragraph on paper money quoted above. It is based on the day to day year to year experience of currency in a strong Western nation, not Venezuela for
example. And not over the timelines of centuries.
I'm not nitpicking here! We typically start saving "money" in our teens and do so all our life with the expectation that in our old age we'll still have it to draw on. In the last century alone hundreds of millions of people just like us have awakened to find that a good percentage of this "Store of value" has vanished. As it turned out it wasn't a store of value after all, which means it wasn't really sound money after all. The exact same thing can happen to us as happened to them, and most likely will in the years ahead. The unfathomable Western Debt load basically guarantees it.
So what is "Money" that you can truly own? Interestingly it's the same Money that people have owned for all recorded history. Physical Gold, and typically silver too. Gold is a store of value, a unit of account still (in every central bank in the world) and it retains it's purchasing power. So why do so many laugh at this or scratch their heads? We have to go back to the beginning of the post to see that. The education system and the Media system that is controlled by those with the reins of power over the
have buried the fact under a mountain of obfuscation, ridicule and pithy lies.
Alan Greenspan was a Gold advocate in his youth, was anti-gold when working for the money creators, and in his old age once again was a Gold advocate. That's ok because none of his early or latter comments made the mass media rounds, only the opinions he espoused when he was with the Federal Reserve bank advising the World to go into Debt "Because it was Smart". The federal Reserve, Which is not a part of the Federal Government btw, and actually has no reserves. Unless you count the debts they hold. So in reality it's not even a Bank, it's a money manipulation corporation, but the creators marketed it as a Bank to give it credibility.
Of course there is a lot more to said about Gold and it's role as sound money but it's a bit like physical exercise in the sense that many will look at it, talk about it, even do a little of it. But in the end return to their sedentary ways. I don't preach the benefits of exercise anymore nor do I preach the benefits of storing life savings in Gold. It's counter productive in fact because it drives up the prices of both used Gold coins and used Gym equipment. Best to let sleeping dogs lie and cash in while you can.