by AdamB » Fri 09 Sep 2022, 17:47:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '
')There is another option, though. It could be that Poland and some other Eastern European countries get actively involved in the war, because they already are pretty seriously involved already and domestic politics could drag them into declaring full-out war, and that would mean that NATO gets involved in a war with Russia, which is pretty much the standard definition of WWIII.
And how do you think that might turn out? Russia is a third rate country and third rate economy suffering from the resource curse, and the only reason they are relevant is because of the nuke arsenal left over from the USSR days.
A conventional war against NATO ends only one way, and fast. Ukraine has brought Russia to a halt for crying out loud. Putin ain't Uncle Joe, and Russia ain't the USSR anymore. And Ukraine is staying on its feet against them with but a fraction of what NATO can apply in terms of conventional military force. So sure, call it whatever word you want, but without nukes involved, Russia can't handle NATO any better than Saddam did, most likely.
While I am in no way a supporter of all the wars America has fought in this century, one thing is quite clear. The best military in the history of our species has had PLENTY of practice as of late. And Russia can't even shadow box with a pygmy.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."
Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"