Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Hemp Thread (merged)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Unread postby Guest » Thu 12 Aug 2004, 09:08:02

I too have read dual purpose hemp is a compromise ;)
Harvesting later for seeds also increases the lignen content making the fibre harder to process

I'm no plant expert but maybe this could be resolved through breeding - I have seen what the marijuana growers have done and its very impressive, they make the cannabis plant produce so many flowers it can't support its own weight!

Unless dual purpose becomes practical hemp oil probably won't be produced in vast quantities even though I can see hemp being grown in vast quantities for fibre/cellulose. Its unfortunate really

However hemp oil is very good for human consumption, ideal for people to grow in their gardens in case of food shortages
It might not taste good but it is one of the most nutritious oil's a human can eat
There are cases where people have lived for weeks on a handful of hemp seeds a day

The main commercial use I can see is the fibre and cellulose which can make paper, cloth and plastic
Unlike seed, its yield of fibre is very high, of good quality and has one of the highest cellulose contents for any plant
It also uses less water than cotton and requires less fertiliser and herbicides than other plants
Some very good reasons to grow lots of hemp

But yeah... I expect we will end up growing canola or sunflowers for bio-fuel
However, if we can perfect a duel use hemp technique we would get an extra bounty of oil along with the fibre

What do you think?

Martin
Guest
 

Unread postby Yavicleus » Thu 12 Aug 2004, 11:59:29

Speaking from experience, *hemp* takes quite a few fertilizers to grow correctly. A brief look at hempbc or hightimes will tell you that. Sure, it's a weed, so it will basically grow anywhere, but to reach optimal yields, it needs as much nutrients and sunlight as it can get.

As much as I'd love to see hemp save the world, I don't see it happening.

Although, I must admit, a "Peak Hemp" scenario would be interesting.

Personally, I think it would be much cooler to run one's car off of hash oil.

:D
User avatar
Yavicleus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri 16 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Guest » Fri 13 Aug 2004, 10:50:25

It does require fertiliser and pesticide but not as much as other plants
The leaves of hemp are high in nitrogen and if you leave them on the ground they self-fertilise to a certain extent

Hemp also has few natural pests so pesticides are not so important

Its just so easy to grow the damn stuff
The US government spends millions trying to kill all the ditchweed and they can't!

I have moved away from hemp as a bio-fuel, unless cellulose can be used to make petrol, can anyone help me on this one???

Hemp has highest cellulose content of any plant so its great for making plastic

Martin
Guest
 

Hemp cellulose

Unread postby Guest » Fri 13 Aug 2004, 11:27:33

Hemp for bio-diesel seems unlikely due to seed yield being a fair bit lower than canola and sunflowers

But what about cellulose: http://www.psrc.usm.edu/macrog/cell.htm

Hemp stems are 77% cellulose which I believe is the highest in the plant kingdom, and its an easy to grow crop. Surely this means we can use it for plastic? How much oil is used to make plastic I wonder

Also I know cellulose can be made into ethanol for fuel. When I looked into hemp diesel you could only get about 50 gallons per acre, thats about 1 barrel of oil. So 1 million acres would give you a million barrels PER YEAR!

But thats relying on millions of tiny seeds, what if you can use the rest of the plant??? What I would like to find out now is how many gallons of ethanol you could get per acre. Does anyone know how to work out how many kg/pounds of cellulose will get you a gallon???

Martin
Last edited by Ferretlover on Thu 05 Mar 2009, 00:59:52, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE Hemp Thread.
Guest
 

Re: Hemp cellulose

Unread postby Codeman » Sat 14 Aug 2004, 13:38:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Anonymous', '
')What I would like to find out now is how many gallons of ethanol you could get per acre

Martin


Hi Martin,

IMHO, wood alcohol creation is somewhat less sustainable because it requires that the cellulose walls be broken down to get to the sugars. Hydrochloric baths are one method. You can see that this additional step is quite problematic.

However, I do feel industrial hemp (non-intoxicating) could be a foundation stone for sustainability in the post peak-oil world. Everyone concerned about peak-oil should be made aware that industrial hemp has had the intoxicating effects of marijauana bred out of it, leaving the plant's value in fuel and fiber. We should all be made aware of the benefits of industrial hemp and discuss it at every possible opportunity, until the laws in the States are relaxed.
Codeman
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby capslock » Sat 14 Aug 2004, 18:48:03

Check out this links page for info about biofuels.

There is a serious disconnect between growing biomass in an environment of abundant petrochemical fertilizers and growing without.

After peak oil, I think one can make more reasonable assessments about yields using the organic method, which would put a biomass crop in a three or four year rotation. You just can't remove 40 acres of pot plants off the farm year after year without serious soil depletion (or use petro fertilizers).

I think Brazil is well poised to take advantage of biofuels with their huge sugarcane/ethanol infrastructure already in place. And guess who is the world's largest grower of soybeans -- a good source of both oil and high-protein factory food?

Two crops worthwhile in more Northern climates are sugar beets and jersalem artichokes (which is high in the sugar inulin).
User avatar
capslock
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Hemp cultivation: Are Jack Herar's claims correct?

Unread postby BILL_THA_PHARMACIZT » Tue 31 Aug 2004, 22:51:26

He says that somthing like 6 percent of U.S. land being used for hemp cultivation could "power" America...

just wondering.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Thu 23 Jul 2009, 21:18:57, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Clarified title.
User avatar
BILL_THA_PHARMACIZT
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Agren » Wed 01 Sep 2004, 02:53:22

6% of what US land? the total land-mass? might very well be, there's a lot of land over there...

But that statement is also meaningless, current farmland in the US is nowhere nerer 6 % of total landmass if Im correclty informed (from nationmaster.com for example) . More details please, and preferably a link to where he say it
User avatar
Agren
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Sweden

Unread postby Devil » Wed 01 Sep 2004, 03:31:04

According to various sources, about 19 - 25% of the land in the contiguous 48 states is arable and farmed. A large portion of this is in the wheat/corn belts and this represents an important export economy. If 1/3 - 1/4 of the arable land were converted to hemp (which is not the best oil crop, anyway), then the US balance of payments would suffer, even if considered that less crude oil would be imported (a bbl of food is more valuable than a bbl of oil!).

Without having seen the doc, or even heard of the author, I suggest that he may be smoking the stuff! :)

Another factor to consider is that crude oil consists of a mixture of different fractions, which are easily cracked to provide a product mix about equal to the demand. Vegetable oils from a single species consist essentially of a few molecules, largely isomeric and refining them to a similar product mix would not be very easy and certainly much more costly. Just heating them will create some polymerisation, especially hemp and linseed oils, which are used in paints and varnishes as "drying oils" for this very reason. This happens even at ambient temperature, albeit more slowly. This forms what is technically described as crud. It would be much better to use oils which do not polymerise readily.
Devil
User avatar
Devil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cyprus

Unread postby Agren » Wed 01 Sep 2004, 08:51:50

problems with the zeros it seems, that's what happens when I'm trying to do things in a hurry :)
ok, around 20% seems to be the figure for arable land in the US.

So, if someone can show that the use of 6% of that land (ie. about 1% of the arable land) would give enough fuel it might be interesting. If it's 6% of the total land it's probably meaningless (as you say). I find it hard to belive the 6% of the arable land figure
User avatar
Agren
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Sweden

Unread postby BILL_THA_PHARMACIZT » Wed 01 Sep 2004, 20:03:06

Actually , my badd .. I Expletive deleted. up. the other night I printed out a bunch of articles about hemp .. and I got this one: link confused with some jack herer Expleive deleted..
anyway....feel free to read it... im just curious regarding peoples responses. also, the author of the article doesn't say arable land ... they say "contiguous". anyway, still ..it can't hurt to read. peace
User avatar
BILL_THA_PHARMACIZT
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby BILL_THA_PHARMACIZT » Wed 01 Sep 2004, 20:05:06

btw I didn't type the word "doo doo" I typed the word Expleive deleted. jack herer isn't doo doo...
User avatar
BILL_THA_PHARMACIZT
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby big_rc » Wed 01 Sep 2004, 20:53:04

Bill,

This hemp idea is not bad. I doubt it would perform as wonderfully as oil but like the article said hemp grows very well in marginal places unsuited for food production. Anybody have any EROEI numbers on hemp/biomass? It probably won't be able to "replace" oil and gas but I like the thought of everyone raising hemp in the big suburban backyards. Post more hemp info if you have it and let's flush this idea out a bit further.
User avatar
big_rc
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Amerika (most of the time)

Unread postby Devil » Thu 02 Sep 2004, 03:22:13

I read your link, which seems to be a smokescreen for growing it for other purposes. The real problem is that one cannabis sativa plant looks very much the same as another. You would inevitably find that a 10 hectare field of hemp would have a square in the middle, growing the much more profitable varieties and no one could tell the difference.

I didn't follow the details, so what I say may not be exact, but commercial hemp growing was permitted a few years ago in the Canton of Valais, Switzerland, on condition that the varieties used were low in THC (?sp). Exactly what I described above happened and all hell broke loose. Other cantons were closely following the evolution and, as a result, have passed even more stringent laws forbidding cannibiculture. I think quite a few farmers saw bars at their window, apart from having their fields destroyed with weedkiller.
Devil
User avatar
Devil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cyprus

Unread postby The_Virginian » Sat 04 Sep 2004, 15:08:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou would inevitably find that a 10 hectare field of hemp would have a square in the middle, growing the much more profitable varieties and no one could tell the difference.


That's bad Hemp farming, the more "profitable" veriatiels would cross polinate with the Industrial hemp and produce a lower THC strain in the "profitble ones (in the next generation).

Not that some would not do it anyway..

As it is now farmers in North Carolina seem to be cought now and again with non idustrial hemp growing in the middle of the Corn Field as a "smokescreen."

I do agree that the campain for industrial hemp and the campain for legalizing "medical" hemp are joined at the hip.

As is Anheiser-Bush (beer) and the anti-Canabis camp.

The question should be put, are we willing to soften laws on ALL types of Canibis in order to help aleviate some of the peak oils effects?
[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watchv=Ai4te4daLZs&feature=related[/url] "My soul longs for the candle and the spices. If only you would pour me a cup of wine for Havdalah...My heart yearning, I shall lift up my eyes to g-d, who provides for my needs day and night."
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Devil » Sun 05 Sep 2004, 03:55:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Virginian', '
')The question should be put, are we willing to soften laws on ALL types of Canibis in order to help aleviate some of the peak oils effects?


It would appear that cannabis is being proposed for two contradictory reasons and I think we would be well advised to consider them separately:

1) for hempseed oil.
This can be extracted only from mature plants which have become less suitable for fibre or other purposes. Hemp is certainly not the best candidate for providing this as a fuel or as a comestible. Many plants give a higher yield of oil/hectare, often with a better quality oil (e.g., colza).

2) as a cellulosic fuel
If the plants are grown for their valuable fibre, as would seem the most profitable, then they are harvested before maturity. After the fibre has been removed, the residues, which appear to be bulky, can certainly be used for gasification. This can be considered as a side benefit.

In either case, this is a far cry from growing hemp purely as a fuel and for no other reason. We have to ask ourselves whether there is a risk of the "wrong" hemp being grown and diverted to more profitable ends. We also have to ask ourselves whether the "right" hemp may not produce more THC than normal in a favourable meteorological year. Who will perform the THC analyses on harvested hemp? I can foresee this as being a bureaucratic nightmare, which will cost much more than alternative crops.

So, to answer your question, no I don't think laws are likely to be "softened". Experience has shown in Switzerland and elsewhere that it doesn't really work, despite the fibres being a valuable product.
Devil
User avatar
Devil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cyprus

Unread postby Guest » Mon 06 Sep 2004, 02:31:55

no offense.. but who givesa Expleive deleted. if people grow weed to smoke it.... decriminalize it and it won't be such a big deal where people are sneaking around like little kids that stole a cookie from the cookie jar....
Guest
 

Hemp,Canabis,Marihuana

Unread postby Thomas » Sun 12 Sep 2004, 05:20:53

Dear All,

It is an interesting debate you have here - however, I strongly suggest that you all read one book, which will really open your eyes:

'The Emperor wears no clothes'.

It tell the incredilbe story about the history of hemp and about lots of uses of this "best of all" plant.

Believe me, once you have read this book - all facts are proven - you might get the feeling that we must change this world immediately - we could solve most of our environmetal and poverty problems within a few years.

One fact: Enough oil could be produced to satisfy the need of petrol and diesel in the US, If hemp was grown on 6% of the US land.

- quote -

http://www.sensiseeds.com/ml/shop.asp?M ... PluNr=5050

The first big picture book on the most useful plant of our planet: Cannabis. More than 200 colour pictures from history and present. On hemp as a resource, medicine and stimulant.
More than half a century attention focused on hemp only because of the intoxicating effects of its blossoms and any other aspect of the plant was almost completely ignored. This book will try to put the whole plant back into the picture, its multiple uses, its long history and most of all its return as one of the planets most useful resources. It will show the cycle of its growth on the fields, the people and machines working with hemp and the wide variety of products coming out of this.
Mathias Broeckers co-authored the German edition of Jack Herers milestone-book on Cannabis: 'The Emperor wears no clothes'.

'Raising general awareness about the limitless aspects of the cannabis plant is a cause that is of interest to all. Besides contributing toward this process, Cannabis is also a beautiful reference book that will look good on any reading table.' - Sensi Seeds

This book is written in 4 languages, please click here for a description of the contents in German, English, Spanish or French.

Author: Mathias Broeckers
224 pages, hardcover.

- unquote -

Pls. read it and write your comments on this page. It made me almost cry out loud.

Regards
Tom
Thomas
 

Unread postby DevilHouse » Wed 15 Sep 2004, 20:45:25

If you're all up in arms about finding a viable plant based diesel, the proverbial "they" are very, very close to perfecting a 100% soy based diesel that could be a very plausible substitute. Energy efficiency matters I'm not certain of, but from what I've heard it'd be possible to use the excess of heat plants as fuel to produce it. Perhaps someone else has more details on it.
User avatar
DevilHouse
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed 15 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Sololeum » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 18:51:46

G'Day from Oz,

Guys - you have a good level of energy in the debate. Just a couple of points I'd like to make.

There are two ultimates to consider.
1. Yield - oil - biodiesel is far more efficient than ethanol due to the engine
and
2. Energy Profit Ratio.

First Yield..
Canola or Rape or Mustard yield almost a ton of oil on good country per hectare. The US only uses 20% diesel in its fleet but with the fleet size that is a considerable 4 to 5 million barrels per day.
We'll say that is 182 million barrersl each year or over 200,000 megalitres.
at 1000 litres per hectare is 200 million hectares or over 20% of your land area. I don't know what your arable is but the figure required would be around half or more!

Now EPR.
Depending on the reports ethanol is either an energy loss or a slight energy profit. Most say it has an EPR of 2. 1 barrel in and get two back.
Biodiesel is better - say 3 or 4. Still not really good.

If you go to a tree crop you can get an EPR of around 20 - that is why the CSIRO here is working on planted forests to supply methanol.
I am promoting an a cultivar of an Australian Native I have identified that gives a yield of 4 to five tons per hectare and not on good arable country - on grazing country! I do not have an accurate assessment of its EPR but it is better than methanol!!

Tree crops are essential as they preserve soils and have a lower energy requirement than annual cropping.

If there are any boffins out there who do EPR Calcs leave a message and I will get back to you. Similarly we are looking for a sophisticated investor or two to help fund the ramping up of vegetatively propagated stock so we can supply a million seedlings per annum.
Eventually we will supply the Gulf States and South America.

The important thing is to have diesel for agriculture and transport - It may be hard but people will get over the shock of not being able to drive tractors (SUV'S) and have to take public transport. It is a little more difficult to get over not eating!

You can forget about the Moon for energy, hydrogen and other scams - they just cost too much energy. The best nuclear has an EPR of 2 and that is over 30 years!!! the average are still in deficit!!

It is not about money it is about energy and trees are the best way to capture the energy from the sun!

In Vi Et Silva
User avatar
Sololeum
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron