Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

URGENT: Everyone, QUIET!!

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Unread postby FatherOfTwo » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 14:06:17

Experiencing a little cognitive dissonance?

Oh, and I don't need to start a thread, one already has been... and I see you've already posted to it
User avatar
FatherOfTwo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Heart of Canada's Oil Country

Unread postby Seeker » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 14:26:13

Feel free to wait for a top-down, authoritarian solution to be implemented. There is no cognitive dissonance in what I seek to do -- I have no unrealistic idea that it will be easy, or that it will be something I can simply create in a week and be done with it. No, I know it will be a lifelong project, and one I need to get started on ASAP, before this idiotic system collapses in on itself. And I have no fear of death, but I'd like to do my best to avoid it, rather than sit around and wait for this system to completely reverse itself. If I don't have time, if starving hordes somehow show up in a rural area intent on killing me (what, are they going to drive? walk? and I'm not sure how "starving" and "hordes" go together... wouldn't a horde of starving people turn in on itself first? And since they would come from the city, how do they plan on getting around all of the OTHER "starving hordes"? And lastly, how do they figure out where I am? How many city-folk have ever heard of the WORD ecovillage, or sustainable community? Hm? Do you really think they'll know where to look, or be able to get there if they do?), if some other scenario happens and I die, I'm okay with that. I'll take my chances and start working on self-sufficiency, rather than living as a completely helpless dependent all of my life.

And you missed the point of the thread creation request. I just wanted you to let me know when the crash was going to happen, when and where the starving hordes were going to appear, if/how powerdown is GOING TO happen (not just the plan made up by people on a forum far far away from where people actually make decisions), and a few other things that might be helpful for us to know. While you're doing that, maybe you can meditate on how likely or practical the "solutions" we've put together in the Building a Consensus thread are. Thanks for the info.
User avatar
Seeker
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby FatherOfTwo » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 16:07:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Seeker', 'F')eel free to wait for a top-down, authoritarian solution to be implemented. There is no cognitive dissonance in what I seek to do -- I have no unrealistic idea that it will be easy, or that it will be something I can simply create in a week and be done with it.


Ahh, I didn’t know you were moving to Inuvik.
Seriously, self-sufficiency will be the way of the future. I do not believe remote self sufficiency is a practical way to survive the transition. Some do. Good luck.
User avatar
FatherOfTwo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Heart of Canada's Oil Country

Unread postby Novus » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 19:31:06

I don't think anyone is EVER goint to have to worry about starving hordes. What I would worry about is being alone in the middle of nowhere years after the collapse and a lone theif steals my only horse on a moonless night. Or what if my horse or cow simply dies. There would be no way to replace them. The interconnected mega farms will not have this problem. Becoming 100% independent of the system is ultimately a death sentence.

I see independence as luxury. An usustainable luxury brought to you by cheap energy. One thousand years ago there was no such thing as independance for the individual. Life was extreamly hard and the only way to survive was through the close-nit interdependance of the Feudal system. If you did something bad to the collective they would not kill you they would just exile you because that would produce the same result only they wouldn't have to go through the trouble of murdering you and disposing of your corpse. As life slowly got better and people starting using coal for heating the Feudal manor system died out and was replaced by larger towns where people could be more independant then just a serf. People were still highly interdependant and exile was still a death sentence. Around the same time or a little later farming became a family affair with large extended families living together on one Farm. Over the generations these farms were subdivided into smaller and smaller plots which gave rise to more and more independance as it took less land to feed the same amount of people. Industrialization gave rise to more independance coming in the form of the nuclear family. In the 20th century independance of the individual became a cultural cliche with everyone wanting a peice of the american dream. Everyone wanted their own home in the burbs and their own car.

Now with cheap energy comming to an end don't you think the clock will turn back with interdependance replacing independance. We can already begin to see it happening. The youngest generation has been coined as the boomerang generation because life has become so hard for twenty-somethings they have had to more back in with their parents. Once again we are starting to see three generations living under one roof which was unheard of 20 years ago. I expect this to continue and excelerate as times get harder post peak. We are also seeing the rise of the four and five income household where 4 or 5 working adults share one house. In the poorest neighborehoods as many as 10 or more working adults are needed to sustain one house. Post peak this will be common place and a necessity for survival. Independance will be seen as a curse and exile will once again become a death sentence.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 19:44:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', 'W')hat I would worry about is being alone in the middle of nowhere years after the collapse and a lone theif steals my only horse on a moonless night.


Why would you be alone in the middle of nowhere?
Ludi
 

Unread postby Mower » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 08:39:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', '.')..since we can't stop peak oil, we had better make sure to tell everyone we can about it ahead of time so they can prepare.


I fundamentally disagree with this: a major catastrophe is comikng and millions will die amid unprecidented violence. Telling everybody merely interfers with my own personal survival plan. All I care about at this point is the welfare of my family. It's too late to be a humanitarian.
User avatar
Mower
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby Mower » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 08:46:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Seeker', 'T')he only thing keeping the dollar and the economy afloat is confidence. We've got to keep that confidence, while simultaneously transitioning to an alternative and also spreading the word.


The "transition" will not occurr without massive disruption and dislocation. It's far too late now. I wish to keep things running along as long as possible so as to make adequate preperations for my family (mainly moving away from population densities and becoming self-sufficient).
User avatar
Mower
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Unread postby Battle_Scarred_Galactico » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 09:29:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', 'I') don't think anyone is EVER goint to have to worry about starving hordes. What I would worry about is being alone in the middle of nowhere years after the collapse and a lone theif steals my only horse on a moonless night. Or what if my horse or cow simply dies. There would be no way to replace them. The interconnected mega farms will not have this problem. Becoming 100% independent of the system is ultimately a death sentence.

I see independence as luxury. An usustainable luxury brought to you by cheap energy. One thousand years ago there was no such thing as independance for the individual. Life was extreamly hard and the only way to survive was through the close-nit interdependance of the Feudal system. If you did something bad to the collective they would not kill you they would just exile you because that would produce the same result only they wouldn't have to go through the trouble of murdering you and disposing of your corpse. As life slowly got better and people starting using coal for heating the Feudal manor system died out and was replaced by larger towns where people could be more independant then just a serf. People were still highly interdependant and exile was still a death sentence. Around the same time or a little later farming became a family affair with large extended families living together on one Farm. Over the generations these farms were subdivided into smaller and smaller plots which gave rise to more and more independance as it took less land to feed the same amount of people. Industrialization gave rise to more independance coming in the form of the nuclear family. In the 20th century independance of the individual became a cultural cliche with everyone wanting a peice of the american dream. Everyone wanted their own home in the burbs and their own car.

Now with cheap energy comming to an end don't you think the clock will turn back with interdependance replacing independance. We can already begin to see it happening. The youngest generation has been coined as the boomerang generation because life has become so hard for twenty-somethings they have had to more back in with their parents. Once again we are starting to see three generations living under one roof which was unheard of 20 years ago. I expect this to continue and excelerate as times get harder post peak. We are also seeing the rise of the four and five income household where 4 or 5 working adults share one house. In the poorest neighborehoods as many as 10 or more working adults are needed to sustain one house. Post peak this will be common place and a necessity for survival. Independance will be seen as a curse and exile will once again become a death sentence.


From personal experience I'd agree with this 100%. I also agree with the prediction.
---
Battle_Scarred_Galactico
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby retiredguy » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 13:39:08

Entropyfails,

Could I ask you to provide some specifics as to how you are preparing for PO? Can't seem to glean that info from your posts.

I'm in general agreement with Seeker, that we need to develop some sort of Plan B. And that Plan B be community-, not individually-based.

As far as pannicking people about telling them about PO, that doesn't worry me. Hardly anyone believes me anyway. As long as bellies are full and gas is available to pump, one is going to have a hard time convincing the general public that a crisis is approaching. Even when the effects of PO become evident, most folks are going to attribute the problem to corporate greed, terrorism, etc. The real truth is just going to be too hard to swallow.
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

Unread postby LeonDion » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 14:18:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'I')f the first word about Peak Oil comes from His Majesty, the masses will follow their king to war and misery.

But if everyone finds out about PO before it's publically announced, we might be able to stop some of the worst side effects.


(In cheesy cowboy accent) I think we can still head 'em off at the pass!
User avatar
LeonDion
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu 21 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Kansas, USA
Top

Unread postby jdmartin » Wed 27 Jul 2005, 18:07:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', 'I') don't think anyone is EVER goint to have to worry about starving hordes. What I would worry about is being alone in the middle of nowhere years after the collapse and a lone theif steals my only horse on a moonless night. Or what if my horse or cow simply dies. There would be no way to replace them. The interconnected mega farms will not have this problem. Becoming 100% independent of the system is ultimately a death sentence.

I see independence as luxury. An usustainable luxury brought to you by cheap energy. One thousand years ago there was no such thing as independance for the individual. Life was extreamly hard and the only way to survive was through the close-nit interdependance of the Feudal system. If you did something bad to the collective they would not kill you they would just exile you because that would produce the same result only they wouldn't have to go through the trouble of murdering you and disposing of your corpse. As life slowly got better and people starting using coal for heating the Feudal manor system died out and was replaced by larger towns where people could be more independant then just a serf. People were still highly interdependant and exile was still a death sentence. Around the same time or a little later farming became a family affair with large extended families living together on one Farm. Over the generations these farms were subdivided into smaller and smaller plots which gave rise to more and more independance as it took less land to feed the same amount of people. Industrialization gave rise to more independance coming in the form of the nuclear family. In the 20th century independance of the individual became a cultural cliche with everyone wanting a peice of the american dream. Everyone wanted their own home in the burbs and their own car.

Now with cheap energy comming to an end don't you think the clock will turn back with interdependance replacing independance. We can already begin to see it happening. The youngest generation has been coined as the boomerang generation because life has become so hard for twenty-somethings they have had to more back in with their parents. Once again we are starting to see three generations living under one roof which was unheard of 20 years ago. I expect this to continue and excelerate as times get harder post peak. We are also seeing the rise of the four and five income household where 4 or 5 working adults share one house. In the poorest neighborehoods as many as 10 or more working adults are needed to sustain one house. Post peak this will be common place and a necessity for survival. Independance will be seen as a curse and exile will once again become a death sentence.


Man, and I thought I was a doomer...

Unusual for me, but I think I disagree with almost everything in this post.

The greatest human need after water, food, and shelter (in that order) is that of companionship. The reason for exiling someone was to deny them the ability to interact with others, not to starve them out of existence. In lands of tribes and communal use of the land (i.e., everywhere save most of Europe and parts of Asia), the land belonged to everyone. As a tribesman (or woman), chances are that you knew how to make a bow & arrow out of rocks and sticks, forage for berries, hide in a cave, and dress yourself in an animal skin. You weren't likely to die by being cast away from your tribe. Rather, you would be denied the ability to take part in the human experience. If you died, it was likely because you either had an accident (animal, act of God), were captured by a rival tribe, or decided to end it all. The most likely reason that one wouldn't be an individual survivalist, then, is because you would miss being with other people. The idea that all this crap that surrounds us will suddenly go away, so that you'll have nothing anywhere to fashion even rudimentary tools and objects with, is ridiculous. If we're at a point where it's akin to the stone age, or bronze age, or iron age, etc, you're not going to be trying to build TV's. You can fashion a crude plow out of almost any hunk of metal or wood.

Where I live, there are a lot of Mexicans who live here seasonally to work the tomato, tobacco and apple fields. Some of them live 10 adults to a house, but it is not because they have to in order to survive. Rather, they exist fairly rudimentary and send most of their earnings back home to support their family. I have a friend that owns a Mexican restaurant and he tells me that many of these people's families live quite well back home since a dollar goes much further. Granted, spending 5 months away from your family would suck. 10 people working full time to support one house? If they were each making minimum wage you'd be talking about over 2 grand a month coming in. Besides that, at some point you're talking about diminishing returns. If it takes every bit of a minimum wage to support one person, then adding people makes no sense. In other words, when you reach the point of equilibrium for the fixed expenses (rent, for example), every person you add that doesn't increase the available money is simply a neutral or negative drain on the system. Obviously, in my example, the 10 Mexicans who live together have enough money to not only maintain the house but send most of it back home. Which means it really doesn't take 10 of them to maintain the house. I would challenge you to find any middle-class enclave where 4 or 5 working adults are necessary just to survive, because I don't believe it exists (not in the US). Even the worst-off people I know, which is many, can make ends meet with the husband and wife working. Yes, they're living close to the edge, but they're nowhere near your Max-Max world.
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
User avatar
jdmartin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Merry Ol' USA
Top

Unread postby Pops » Wed 27 Jul 2005, 18:56:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', '
')The Planning for the Future forum is the only forum I don't read because the advise presented there is complete nonsence. Those amature farmers will be the first to fail when things get ugly. They have the least experience, the worst land, and no protection from post peak lawlessness.


Based on what evidence? It seems to me (of course I am biased in that I read that forum) that there are many who have years of experience from small scale gardening and preserving of their own food to those that live off grid on 90% their own crops.

Speaking for myself only (as I don’t recall anyone posting a soils survey there) I have a fair amount of fairly good land, and no mortgage.

Oh and then there is lawlessness, looters, scary creepy things that go bump in the night, blah, blah, whatever...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', ' ')The large authoritarian industrial and organic farms on the best land will last the longest. These are the lifeboats and the best way to survive is to get a seat on one.


I haven’t seen many of these but I suppose they are fairly secretive being authoritarian and all. But then again, they are large and industrial so you would think they would be pretty obvious - how does one get a "seat" there anyway?


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', ' ')Living in an area where distribution is easy is the best bet.


So is that like a refugee camp? Seems that is a rather short term solution IMO.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', ' ')Second best bet is to get out of debt and save money for the rainy days we all know are coming.


Funny that your last suggestion has been discussed in (and in fact is the title of) many threads on the planning forum not to mention probably the first suggestion on any to-do list there.

P.S. Devin, sorry to be off topic – BTW, what kind of topic is not discussing the topic of the site on a discussion board?
:)
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Unread postby Novus » Wed 27 Jul 2005, 20:10:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jdmartin', '
')
Man, and I thought I was a doomer...


I am a doomer and I can be much gloomier considering I did not even bring up the effects of total colapse and die off. What you read was really just my soft landing senerio.

In this soft landing most of us will live but we will only survive by dramatically increasing our interdependance. My opinions are rooted in what I see going on in the rough urban/suburban area I live in. I see a lot of societal distress that may not have spread across the rest of the US...Yet. Twenty-somethings are moving back in with their parents in droves. Twenty-somethings are moving in together to be able to pay the rent which is $2000 per month even for a small home and apartments are not much cheaper either. If your only job is working at McDonalds for $7/hr you will be homeless in this area if you do not rely on the support of others in the same economic situation. Even if you are making twice that you would be hard pressed to be able to afford your own apartment.

Sure you can have a higher standard of living in the outer areas but that would require a long commute and more dependance on the car. Post peak it is going to be this commute that is going to become impossible long before we run out of food. As a result spralled out communities will collapse into dencer suburban/urban areas such as the one I live in now. It is a low energy lifestyle and life is hard because of it. For the last 70 years or so we have been given a choice between high energy rural/suburban life or low energy urban/suburban life. Post Peak that choice is going to be made for us because there just won't be the available energy to live the rural/suburban lifestyle.

The way I see the future unfolding is based on objective reality. When the rural/suburban lifestyle becomes impossible where are the millions of people living in outer suburbia going to go? Which is more logical: are they going to become farmers on their little quarter or half acre lots or are they going to go back to the urban areas where food can still be transported by rail from the mega-farms? A few will remain behind and recombine the lots into larger farms but by necessity most will have to leave for the cities.

A few have sugested on this forum that we create "bug-out" farms far from the urban centers and beyond the mega-farms on land too poor even for agribusiness to farm with cheap energy. I just don't see any survivablitiy in this strategy even in the short term. The low energy urban enviroment will survive for a good long time post peak which should cover most of our natural lifespans. After that things get gloomier.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 27 Jul 2005, 20:30:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', '
')A few have sugested on this forum that we create "bug-out" farms far from the urban centers and beyond the mega-farms on land too poor even for agribusiness to farm with cheap energy. I just don't see any survivablitiy in this strategy even in the short term. .


Can you explain more why you don't see people being able to survive on farms?
Ludi
 
Top

Unread postby jato » Wed 27 Jul 2005, 20:38:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')an you explain more why you don't see people being able to survive on farms?


Unless someone (government/warlords/starving people) steal your farm or fruits of your labor, this seems like the best plan for survival.
jato
 
Top

Unread postby turmoil » Wed 27 Jul 2005, 20:39:21

novus, even during shortages do you think that there will be enough food for everyone living in the cities?
"If you are a real seeker after truth, it's necessary that at least once in your life you doubt all things as far as possible"-Rene Descartes

"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth"-Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

Unread postby Seeker » Wed 27 Jul 2005, 21:08:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'P').S. Devin, sorry to be off topic – BTW, what kind of topic is not discussing the topic of the site on a discussion board? :)


I dunno, haha. :-D I guess I just thought it was more typical for threads here to remain on the topic they started on... but then I guess this is no different than any other forum I've been on, so. Oh well. :)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', 'W')hat I would worry about is being alone in the middle of nowhere years after the collapse and a lone theif steals my only horse on a moonless night.


Why would you be alone in the middle of nowhere?


I think Ludi highlights a discrepancy here. I don't think anyone is seeking to go off alone and try to live as a hermit. That really IS a poor survival strategy, haha. I mean, it can be done, but living with a community is much more secure and safe than going off by yourself. Not to mention happier and more fulfilling.

The mega-farms are going to be the first to go. Centralized .. centers of production are exactly that. Centers. They depend on inputs from all over the world... on pesticides, on the transportation systems, on distant processing and packaging plants, on oil-powered machinery manufactured hundreds or thousands of miles away (and the machinery itself requires huge amounts of specialization and centralized production). IMO, we're not going to be able to support this level of complexity and interdependence any more. Break one link in the chain, and we're seeing some major problems. Peak Oil has the potential to not just break one link in the chain, but many or most. These mega-farms you speak of are the most highly dependent on these complex and unsustainable systems, and they will be the first to go.

This is just common sense, really. Cheap oil allowed centralization and specialization beyond imagination, and so when the end of cheap oil puts shackles on our necessarily constantly expanding economy, we're going to be running that race in reverse. (Except probably a lot faster.)

Those who are independent of this collapse, separate from it, will have the best chance of survival. Those who are utterly dependent on the current systems will have the hardest time staying afloat.
User avatar
Seeker
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby retiredguy » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 12:34:56

Seeker,

Couldn't agree with you more; your assessment is totally correct. The challenge is how to build these eco-communties. The vast majority of Westerners are not ready to make this committment and I suspect that a great many posters here aren't ready to do that either.

Of those that might be interested, many probably don't have the skills needed to build such a community.

I saw attempts at this in the 60s, but very few of these communities exist today. Takes a lot of dedication and strong leadership.

Do you have a plan?
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

Unread postby Ghog » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 13:12:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ouldn't agree with you more; your assessment is totally correct. The challenge is how to build these eco-communties. The vast majority of Westerners are not ready to make this committment and I suspect that a great many posters here aren't ready to do that either.


Like is usually the case with most challenging situations, some will step up to the plate, while most others will just fail or do nothing.
User avatar
Ghog
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon 18 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania
Top

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 13:21:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('retiredguy', '
')I saw attempts at this in the 60s, but very few of these communities exist today. Takes a lot of dedication and strong leadership.


True, it also takes a lot of talking, clear communication, and a shared vision. Anyone planning to join or form an intentional community should be sure to read Diana Leafe Christian's "Creating a Life Together" which examines communties which succeeded, and those that failed, and why.
Ludi
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron