Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE "False Flag" Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby CrudeAwakening » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 06:31:41

Anyone seen "The Power of Nightmares?" by Adam Curtis?

Gripping viewing.

Hmm, I was about to post a link to the video at informationclearinghouse, but they've just taken it down in the past few days...
User avatar
CrudeAwakening
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby venky » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 08:09:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CrudeAwakening', 'A')nyone seen "The Power of Nightmares?" by Adam Curtis?

Gripping viewing.

Hmm, I was about to post a link to the video at informationclearinghouse, but they've just taken it down in the past few days...


Great documentary, I believe he is essentially right. But nonetheless he will stand discredited following the attacks in London in most people's eyes. But he never says there is no terrorist threat, what he says that the belief that Al-Qaeda is a super orgranization, centrally organized by Bin Laden with sleeper cells in 60 countries is utterly false. He talks about the politics of fear, how this distrotion was used to sell the war in Afghanistan and Iraq.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Wildwell » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 08:32:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I')t was quite clearly a false flag operation. Why would terrorists want to interrupt the delightful spectacle of Blair being tried for the high crimes that the Downing Street memo clearly outlines? Come on, you schmaltzy emotion based goofballs, use your freaking heads.

Terrorism is politically motivated and timed to exact the most damage to the terrorist's opponent. How in hell does this act damage Blair? It helps him personally and politically. Did you listen carefully to his quavery voice in his address to the nation just after it happened? Do you think that was because he felt so bad for those people? Really? Think about it. The guy's a proven blatant liar who has sent many Brits to their death in Iraq with a smile on his face. Watch him on televised parliamentary proceedings, if you can handle the show of teeth. He's uber-creepy.

He was all quivery because he's involved in a criminal conspiracy either directly or indirectly and the guy is SCARED.


That’s just where you’re wrong. Blair (and the government in general) is getting themselves into no end of politically damaging manoeuvres by current policies.

Firstly, almost everyone is saying *some* of the Islamists shouldn’t have been let in the country, the blame for the recent high immigration has fallen firmly at the Labour government and EU’s feet.

Next, many people are saying that we should have never been in Iraq in the first place, we’re a small country with plenty of domestic problems and need to learn to mind our own business.

As for the ‘corporate conspiracy’, well who the hell was in the world trade centre but corporate types? Most of the people who travel on the tube are people working in financial power houses and company HQs in central London.

Already, many, mainly US, tourists are staying away, retail takings are down 50% over the weekend in London and in other places. The second city was evacuated last night in a bomb scare.

So politically it’s a loser, financially it’s a loser and it creates a huge problem for the corporate people in London, one of the biggest financial centres on the planet, because there is no other way to get to work other than public transport!

Looks like one mighty own goal to me if this is a conspiracy…

BTW George Galloway is on a talk show this afternoon, if you want a mood of the people here at www.talksport.net
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby BiGG » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 09:17:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sunspot', 'A')h BiGG, nice to see you're still insulting everyone....
These are the energy wars, plain and simple. Most wars are about the acquisition of natural resources. Or preventing somebody else from getting those natural resources. Everyone needs to read Klare's "Rseource Wars" and Perkins "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man". This is how the world works, kids. Natural resources. Basic stuff. We'll be finding that out the hard way soon.


I suppose this is how the world works for those of diminished capacity but there are of those of us who don’t suffer such a fate. If you ever gain the ability to get yourself past only looking at information that supports your current conspiracy theory-of-the-day, I suggest reading a little history starting with radical Islam & other terrorists. I think you will find that disease is growing rampantly, in need of an antidote, and has zero to do with alleged resource wars.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby MD » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 09:33:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BiGG', '.')...I suggest reading a little history starting with radical Islam & other terrorists. I think you will find that disease is growing rampantly, in need of an antidote, and has zero to do with alleged resource wars.

I have to agree with BiGG here, religious violence has been a major problem for millennia, with the current flavor coming mostly from islamists. Behind them there are other religious groups just waiting for their chance.
We truly are in a battle for the cultural direction of the planet. I for one don't care to see the worlds women cloaked in burkas, subjected to vaginal circumcision, and denied equal rights with men. That ideology needs to be fought.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Unread postby BiGG » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 09:45:49

SidneyTawl,

Let me try it this way …….. you see, you post some really ignorant stuff frequently that others here including me have tried to help you with by listing clear & concise reality among other things.

Now instead of showing you are capable of comprehending even the really easy stuff and learning something as you go (showing a sign of remote intelligence), you return instead with something even stupider pretending you have some kind of wit above the elementary level.

Stupid seems to know no bounds with your retorts and you are the only one that doesn’t know it. So here’s the key ……instead of upping the stupid bar with every rejoinder, show you can post something void of that little concern as you are just a bore otherwise.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Jake_old » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 10:05:02

MD

I agree that we should be fighting for the cultural direction of the planet, and fighting against the subjugation of any person is a worthy cause.

I don't see it as religious violence, people are often violent even when Atheist, Religion is often used as a recruiting tool. When we were a poorer and more ignorant christian society we commited crimes under the guise of Christianity.

I don't understand why people who believe in a particular conspiracy are labeled as stupid or nutcases, Its happened before and could happen again.

Please don't shout me down, I don't believe this is an 'inside job' but I do believe that the current terrorist events stem from inequalities in the world, as well as a lack of education, corruption etc..

I cannot believe that any group wants to destroy liberty, that just doesn't make sense to me. I think that stupid people believe they are going to paradise which contains some pretty sick entertainment if you ask me but it shows how truly stupid those people are. It wouldn't matter what religion they were, they just have nothing to loose.

We are dropping bombs on poor people and we call it collateral damage but I doubt thats any concelation to their families, Its ok when we do it but not when they do it.

Its highly possible or even probable that leaders and military planners have no idea of what to do and they need to keep up the facade of having a plan. Just my 2c.
Jake_old
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri 25 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Luton, England

Unread postby BiGG » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 10:21:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'W')ho here thinks that members of the Bush Team were disheartened and truly saddened at the London bombings?


I do

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hose interests were advanced by them?


Those that think Muhammad was visited regularly approximately 1400 years ago by the alleged angel Gabriel who was sent by an alleged Jewish god. You know, that alleged angel who told Muhammad the alleged Jesus was merely a prophet from the alleged Jewish god and not a reincarnation, or the son of that god like the Christians claim.

So anyway, those radical fruitcakes think they are working on this alleged gods behalf and are trying to get those 72 virgins Muhammad promised them. Strapping on a bomb-belt and other such atrocities is a handy way of doing just that.

See how easy this is? George doesn’t need to worry about creating anything like the wacky conspiracies you keep coming up with, George needs to worry about damage control from those who think its fashionable to splatter mommas & babies all over town in their quest for virgins. It’s not like this is something new ya know? Muhammad’s warriors have been the epitome of debauchery since looooooooooooong before George was born.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby MD » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 10:24:55

Redjake

I don't know where I have showed a tendency to shout anyone down, and I don't intend to start.

In saying that radical islam ideology needs to be fought, I don't mean by bombing them into submission, or committing genocide.

In attempting to understand their position, I have found that they have no interest in discussion, they are not interested in having "us" just go away and leave them alone. They truly want to convert or destroy, period. Granted this is a small percentage of Islam, but that small percentage is a great danger to the world currently.

I wish there was an easy answer, there is not.

the inquisision
radiacl zionism
the crusades
the holocaust
radical hinduism
etc
etc

Conspiracy theorists: I haven't called them stupid. Some of them are obsessed and/or paranoid though. The only certainty of conspiracy is that they do indeed exist, at many levels. The only certainty of paranoia is that sometimes that "they" are indeed "out to get you". Obsessive compulsive I know all about, I am deeply afflicted with both. Just note how much time I am spending on this forum for evidence.

I can't believe people want to destroy liberty either, but I have tried to "climb into their heads", and what I saw was frightening. I have to conclude that there are truly evil people in the world, with plenty of ignorant followers.

We are caught in a dilemma.

It goes on and on, man's inhumanity to man in a relentles destructive cycle, only interrupted by periods of prosperity.
Last edited by MD on Sun 10 Jul 2005, 10:34:23, edited 1 time in total.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Unread postby Sunspot » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 10:33:49

I have a slogan for you BiGG: 927 posts and still clueless. You are the one who needs to look harder at other points of view. Have you read Perkins "Confessions of an Economic hit man?? Read Heinberg, Campbell, Kunstler, Deffeyes. etc. etc? Do you actually know anything about Peak Oil??? If you had any actual rebuttal to the information they present then we'd have something to talk about.
Feel free to respond to any of my posts. For my part, I will be ignoring your responses and will no longer reply to them. Maybe it will catch on. Although I doubt you'll go away if we ignore you. It'll be more fun to hear you whine when it all hits the fan before the end of this year. Because we are right, and you are soooooooo wrong!
User avatar
Sunspot
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri 06 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Weare, NH

Unread postby Jake_old » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 10:40:12

Thanks for your response MD, it is something for me to ponder.

About the shouting down, it wasn't personal, I just kind of expected all the usual insults from lots of posters who seem to believe conspiracies are impossible.

Sunspot, BiGG gets to me too but please don't ignore him, if you disagree then more reason to post an opposing view. I like it here because of these diffierent and sometimes polarised views.
Jake_old
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri 25 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Luton, England

Unread postby Sunspot » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 11:00:41

Re:BiGG - I wish I could find something coherent there to disagree with. But there seems to be nothing but pie-in-the-sky schemes and insulting anyone who doesn't agree. It seems odd that someone would spend so much time on this message board just creating static. The only proper response to someone like that seems to be the junior-high "meet me at the flagpole". I simply don't find it useful to get into arguments with someone who just shouts back and refuses to engage in a serious discussion of the issues. I get enough of that in the real world.
User avatar
Sunspot
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri 06 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Weare, NH

Unread postby Chuckmak » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 11:10:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'N')othing like avoiding the root of the problem. Let me spell it out for you.
I-S-L-A-M.

You can try to hide from the harsh facts all you want, but it doesnt change anything. Do you see Catholics killing women and children?


whoops...forgot about the irish republican army.
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City
Top

Unread postby BiGG » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 11:11:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sunspot', 'I') have a slogan for you BiGG: 927 posts and still clueless. You are the one who needs to look harder at other points of view. Have you read Perkins "Confessions of an Economic hit man?? Read Heinberg, Campbell, Kunstler, Deffeyes. etc. etc? Do you actually know anything about Peak Oil??? If you had any actual rebuttal to the information they present then we'd have something to talk about.
Feel free to respond to any of my posts. For my part, I will be ignoring your responses and will no longer reply to them. Maybe it will catch on. Although I doubt you'll go away if we ignore you. It'll be more fun to hear you whine when it all hits the fan before the end of this year. Because we are right, and you are soooooooo wrong!


See, that’s the thing about you conspiracy-of-the-day theorist. You only read unsubstantiated information supporting your position and assume the rest. You don’t even hold the basic critical thinking skills requiring your information sources to have a clue so I shouldn’t expect you could do any better than cheap assumptions anyway I suppose.

Your baseless prophecies of doom don’t impress me and you will surly not have to worry about hearing me whine as I’m most likely better prepared for any crisis then anybody here, so we can already see your assumptions are getting the better of you.

Simply continue on with running around screaming the sky is falling and believing dolts like the one that wrote “Confessions of an Economic Conman” and I will continue laughing you out of the room. Fair enough sweetie?
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 13:05:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I')t was quite clearly a false flag operation. Why would terrorists want to interrupt the delightful spectacle of Blair being tried for the high crimes that the Downing Street memo clearly outlines? Come on, you schmaltzy emotion based goofballs, use your freaking heads.

Terrorism is politically motivated and timed to exact the most damage to the terrorist's opponent. How in hell does this act damage Blair? It helps him personally and politically. Did you listen carefully to his quavery voice in his address to the nation just after it happened? Do you think that was because he felt so bad for those people? Really? Think about it. The guy's a proven blatant liar who has sent many Brits to their death in Iraq with a smile on his face. Watch him on televised parliamentary proceedings, if you can handle the show of teeth. He's uber-creepy.

He was all quivery because he's involved in a criminal conspiracy either directly or indirectly and the guy is SCARED.


That’s just where you’re wrong. Blair (and the government in general) is getting themselves into no end of politically damaging manoeuvres by current policies.

Firstly, almost everyone is saying *some* of the Islamists shouldn’t have been let in the country, the blame for the recent high immigration has fallen firmly at the Labour government and EU’s feet.

Next, many people are saying that we should have never been in Iraq in the first place, we’re a small country with plenty of domestic problems and need to learn to mind our own business.

As for the ‘corporate conspiracy’, well who the hell was in the world trade centre but corporate types? Most of the people who travel on the tube are people working in financial power houses and company HQs in central London.

Already, many, mainly US, tourists are staying away, retail takings are down 50% over the weekend in London and in other places. The second city was evacuated last night in a bomb scare.

So politically it’s a loser, financially it’s a loser and it creates a huge problem for the corporate people in London, one of the biggest financial centres on the planet, because there is no other way to get to work other than public transport!

Looks like one mighty own goal to me if this is a conspiracy…

BTW George Galloway is on a talk show this afternoon, if you want a mood of the people here at www.talksport.net


Wildwell, No, actually maybe you don't understand. The latest bombings in London make Blair even more unpopular by many Brits-- agreed!

But--I think you are likely wrong in your underlying assumptions about how the present Anglo-American imperial hegemon is functioning. You underestimate the lethal nature of an insidious criminal conspiracy and therefore assume that a tarnished image in a consensus driven political climate is Blair's worst fear. That might be the case, and I may be wildly off the mark. Nothing is certain here, but you should consider alternative explanations, because this isn't your daddy's political system, to quote a popular Yankee phrase.

The forensics of this situation revolve around that one question. What does Tony Blair fear most? A dreadful image, or ending up in prison for the rest of his life? I'd say as long as he has the backing of the military and the intelligence services, and the alternative is a conservative govt, that appears to be even worse than Blairco- an act of terrorism, as a diversion, no matter how troublesome, is to his advantage.

Many people, myself included, predicted that when things got hot for the neocons, be they American or British, they would react like cornered animals and things could get very scary--for everyone. That your entire country appears to be suffering even more, due to this act of terrorism, fits very well with the criminal conspiracy model. The British, like the Americans are now, at least functionally, a totalitarian dictatorship, controlled by organized criminals who will start wars to further their own interests. I have to ask you, if they would start wars simply to further their own interests, what would they stop at to actually save themselves from criminal prosecution?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby SidneyTawl » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 13:39:35

AGain Bigg,

explain your remark about

(but you will not be playing pretend with me ……k")

This very easily appears to be a "threat"

Aaron and other mods please take notice.

As for reading History.

Well, Like I said I have done mine. Started many many years ago. For example in my second year in college I had to take the required US American history course.

Didn't even buy or read the book, didn't study for one single test, used my time for something else.

No I didn't get an A only a B. a 94 average is a B at the school I attended (at the time).

What history have I read lately.

JOHN ADAMS by David McCulloguh
HIS EXCELLENCY GEORGE WASHINGTON Joseph J Ellis

Purchasing after I finsinh "His Excellency"

1776 David McCullough.

Your attempt to compare the actions of GW and Irag and the current "war on terror" to anything of the philosophy/actions of Thomas Jefferson borders on the absurd IMO.

TJ would be demanding and probably leading the group to push for the impeachement of GW for his actions. AND probably try to get the whole lot of congress tossed out.


Most like you bigg only know the names, and the little bit they got in HS. THey know he "wrote" and this pretty much means he took pen to paper really. John Adams contributed and others contributed. (you might be surprised at how much John A did for this country.) He was from the opposite "party" if you will than Jefferson. They didn't care for each other but worked with each other to get a goal done. THey didn't go out drinking together after the war either (if you got my drift). Though at the end of their years TJ and JA became friendly again, and in another one of those acts of

syncronicity

They both died on the same day and year.

do you know the story of the cannon getting to Boston Bigg.
do you know the names and lives of people that gave up everything on the hope they could give birth to a country that would give them "the right to pursuit of life, liberty and happines".

Bigg keep showing your ignorance it only helps those that disagree with you each time you regurgitate some cut and paste without understanding what you have just posted.

Thomas Jefferson ( a snip from web article for HS students etc.)

"Jefferson objected to certain of Hamilton's policies as favoring merchants and financiers rather than farmers. Most of the people in the United States were then farmers, and Jefferson always thought of himself as one. He believed in individual liberty more than Hamilton did and trusted the people more. He thought that Hamilton was trying to increase the power of the national government beyond what was permitted by the Constitution. Jefferson favored the strict interpretation of the Constitution, believing that this would prevent tyranny."

Go on about comparing the act of Jefferson against the Pirates we were paying a tribute and the current war and how the Presidnet got the authority.

TJ also advocated the overthrow of the US govt, if the people so desired it, and start over. Ya probably heard it, but TJ really meant it. He did see the dangers ahead.

Fighting a battle at sea over "tribute". Sailed into the harbor to show strentght AND THEN LEFT>

Yep Bigg you sure posted some relevent stuff.

At least the people reading this got perhaps a little history. Thats a positive from your negative IMO>
User avatar
SidneyTawl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby ECM » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 13:46:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MD', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BiGG', '.')...I suggest reading a little history starting with radical Islam & other terrorists. I think you will find that disease is growing rampantly, in need of an antidote, and has zero to do with alleged resource wars.

I have to agree with BiGG here, religious violence has been a major problem for millennia, with the current flavor coming mostly from islamists. Behind them there are other religious groups just waiting for their chance.
We truly are in a battle for the cultural direction of the planet. I for one don't care to see the worlds women cloaked in burkas, subjected to vaginal circumcision, and denied equal rights with men. That ideology needs to be fought.


1. Vaginal circumcision - As if penile circumcision is any less of a mutilation. It has risks, is unnecessary, and reduces the quality of life for the male. Nature made men a certain way and they should be left that way. Even if you believe God created man then who are the Christians to think they know better than the creator.

2. Islamic violence - Perhaps the Islamists would be a lot less violent if the Christians would stop bombing, starving, and screwing with them. For every Christian the Islamists kill the Christians slay legions of Islamists.

3. Terrorism - Terrorism is a form of response to some extreme circumstances. U.S., U.K., and Soviet/Russian war and politics in the Middle East have been the single biggest catalyst for the creation of terrorists. The antidote to terrorism is to leave these people alone. Terrorism needs hate and fear to grow and survive.
User avatar
ECM
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby shakespear1 » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 15:07:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '3'). Terrorism - Terrorism is a form of response to some extreme circumstances. U.S., U.K., and Soviet/Russian war and politics in the Middle East have been the single biggest catalyst for the creation of terrorists. The antidote to terrorism is to leave these people alone. Terrorism needs hate and fear to grow and survive.


This hate and fear has been ingrained in the Middle East by the long march of history. The Actions of the Church and the Roman Empire have left an indelible imprint on the psyche of the people and their view of the people in the North. Nothing has changing, it is just a continuity of actions of the past.

Just watched a BBC World Uncovered about Darfur, clearly showing how the focus of the West is conditioned based on religion and self interest of the countries capable of help.

In this case China obstructed action by the UN. Why?
OIL
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Carlhole » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 15:57:59

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/ ... 298105.ece

Police hunt 'mercenary' terror gang recruited by al-Qa'ida

Police and intelligence agents are investigating the theory that a gang of white "mercenary terrorists" was hired by al-Qa'ida to carry out last week's devastating attacks on London.

The Independent on Sunday can reveal today that investigations into the bombings of three Tube trains and a bus, which left at least 49 people dead, are focusing on the possibility that criminal gangs were paid to mount the worst atrocities in British history.
Carlhole
 

Unread postby Carlhole » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 16:06:45

http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m13556

London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.

On a BBC Radio 5 interview that aired on the evening of the 7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, which bills itself as a 'crisis management' advice company, better known to you and I as a PR firm.

Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch.

Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.

The transcript is as follows.

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.

Click here for a clip of this dialogue. Click here for a longer clip where the comments can be heard in their full context.

The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact locations and times of the bombings is light years beyond a coincidence. Power said the drill focused around 'simultaneous bombings'. At first the bombings were thought to have been spread over an hour, but the BBC reports just today that the bombings were in fact simultaneous.
Carlhole
 

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron