by Zentric » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 05:50:32
JohnDenver -
I believe I understand what you are fighting for. To summarize, and correct me if I'm wrong, you believe the structure of America is broken, as is the role it is supposed to be playing on the world stage. That the people inside the country are misguided, but, still, in spite of it all, they should be saved from the horrors that are in store.
The structure of America should be about the Constitution and compassion for humanity. But we've gone badly astray.
We should be projecting our high ideals to others in foreign lands, but we're failing now even at doing this domestically.
We consume too much, and we are structured only to consume more, and the finances and resources required for this to continue are destined to bring about domestic and worldwide misery. But we can't stop ourselves!
A world wide massive die off is unacceptable to you - and bravo to you if that is what you truly believe because it is not a foregone conclusion - even though now this does seem likely.
That if we find a way to radically change our leadership (where the business as usual demos and repubs are all terribly, terribly suspect in my opinion), implement a few austerity measures to effectively allow many of us to chill out at home and not waste resources, and without severe hunger or financial penalty for doing so, then maybe the country and the globe can avoid catastrophe.
Amnesty for the plutocrats, politicians and middle management suck-ups who led us to where we are now? Uhhhm, maybe.
Explain to the born again Christians that Armageddon may have to be postponed another several years? Myself, I know of no rational person who would qualify as a 'messenger' to these people. Not entirely incomprehensible though.
Introduce an ethical and pragmatic means to ramp down the human population? Third rail, man. Good luck.
All in all, you're making progress, John. Please let the debate continue.