Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Nothing to fear but fear itself

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Nothing to fear but fear itself

Postby khebab » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 21:12:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'T')he doomers often say: "We can handle P.O. technically. It's the fear and hysteria that's going to cause the collapse."

No, it's collective denial and blindness that's going to cause the collapse and that's why I don't see any technical solution to PO either.
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Nothing to fear but fear itself

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 21:13:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '
')The last thing the U.S. needs to do right now is start a huge fucking world war. They don't have the fuel or the money to win it, and they will get their ass kicked.
China has problems with oil supplies too. In fact, just about everybody's got problems with fuel supplies. Based on what has happened in the past few years, I'd say Uncle Sam is getting ready for it. The old debts and trading arrangements will give way to alliances of war. The alliances will be determined by strategic assessments and calculations of survival prospects by the remaining oil-exporters. For instance, when the hostilities ratchet up to the hotter levels, you might expect a coup in Venezuela by those who are afraid of antagonizing the US. You might find UAE and Saudi Arabia and other OPEC countries coming out clearly for the US because they don't think China will be able to prevail. Everybody flocks to the percieved winner. No War necessary. Game Over. (in this light, the mere fact that the US is fighting in Iraq is enough to show that the US side is the one to be on. The only wild-card I see here is US domestic public opinion and politics)
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Nothing to fear but fear itself

Postby El_Producto » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 21:23:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'C')hina has problems with oil supplies too. In fact, just about everybody's got problems with fuel supplies. Based on what has happened in the past few years, I'd say Uncle Sam is getting ready for it. The old debts and trading arrangements will give way to alliances of war. The alliances will be determined by strategic assessments and calculations of survival prospects by the remaining oil-exporters. For instance, when the hostilities ratchet up to the hotter levels, you might expect a coup in Venezuela by those who are afraid of antagonizing the US. You might find UAE and Saudi Arabia and other OPEC countries coming out clearly for the US because they don't think China will be able to prevail. Everybody flocks to the percieved winner. No War necessary. Game Over. (in this light, the mere fact that the US is fighting in Iraq is enough to show that the US side is the one to be on. The only wild-card I see here is US domestic public opinion and politics)


Yeah, but thats the absoloute best-case scenario for the United States. Can you imagine if the rest of the world smelled blood, and the US had to win several fast campaigns against numorous oil producing countires? Mobilising quickly and in every situation having to go in outnumbered, needing a huge tactical victory in the first few days of the war?

The question the US needs to answer is: Are we willing to risk it all for just a little bit more, just a little while longer? I think we're best to count our blessings.
User avatar
El_Producto
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Delawhere

Re: Nothing to fear but fear itself

Postby JohnDenver » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 21:51:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', ' ')In fact, just about everybody's got problems with fuel supplies.


Russia's still a powerhouse. Lots of oil and natural gas.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he old debts and trading arrangements will give way to alliances of war.


Yah, here's one: the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)
Image

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')or instance, when the hostilities ratchet up to the hotter levels, you might expect a coup in Venezuela by those who are afraid of antagonizing the US.


Why would they be afraid. The U.S. is already stretched to the limit trying to hold it together in Iraq, and they aren't getting any oil out of the deal. Is the U.S. even capable of pacifying Iraq AND Venezuela at the same time? Who's going to pay for it? China?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou might find UAE and Saudi Arabia and other OPEC countries coming out clearly for the US because they don't think China will be able to prevail.


Yah, or you might find Saudi Arabia getting increasingly screwed up due to internal hatred of the monarchy and the U.S. among the general population. How about if the U.S. efforts to spread democracy in the middle east spread to SA, and they vote in an Islamic government which decides to sit on the oil because its in their economic interest? Is the U.S., going to simultaneously kick ass on China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Venezuela? OPEC will just shut off the taps, and pull the plug on the American military robot.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')verybody flocks to the percieved winner. No War necessary. Game Over.


I find it implausible that the entire world is going to sit on its ass while the U.S. wastes all the precious oil, and irresponsibly fouls the atmosphere with greenhouse gas. The U.S. is the problem, and virtually every country in the world is starting to wake up to that.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')in this light, the mere fact that the US is fighting in Iraq is enough to show that the US side is the one to be on.)

In Iraq, the U.S. is getting its ass handed to it on a plate. They are showing the entire world, in very clear terms, that they are a paper tiger and cannot win a war for oil.

PMS, if we are going to fight and take the oil, why aren't we taking Iraq's oil right now? What are we going to do? Pull out, and then go back in later?
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Nothing to fear but fear itself

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 21:58:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('El_Producto', '
')Yeah, but thats the absoloute best-case scenario for the United States. Can you imagine if the rest of the world smelled blood, and the US had to win several fast campaigns against numorous oil producing countires? Mobilising quickly and in every situation having to go in outnumbered, needing a huge tactical victory in the first few days of the war?
.
Well, it looks to me like China is arming as fast as they can and they are the only ones who could challenge the US if War breaks out. The only defence the oil-exporters would have is to threaten to blow up their oil fields or something like that, but that isn't relevant since if they were US allies why would we invade them? Probably the Big Plan is to win this thing without any more shots fired than necessary. No doubt there are many meetings going on behind closed doors in these oil-exporting countries to figure out what to do. My guess is that US policy has been geared towards influencing those meetings.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Nothing to fear but fear itself

Postby El_Producto » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 22:10:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '
')Well, it looks to me like China is arming as fast as they can and they are the only ones who could challenge the US if War breaks out.


Every country is a challenge at this point for the US due to lack of manpower. In a oil-capture situation, they'd have to win huge victories, quickly, in hostile land, vastly outnumbered by everyone of their foes, and occupation of anything a fantasy.

At this point...the only hope for the US would be to start making examples out of the Evildoers civilians...and that can get messy. :twisted:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he only defence the oil-exporters would have is to threaten to blow up their oil fields or something like that


Drawn out insurgency appears to be the best way to challenge an oil war-monger: Hold his troops in place, and keep them demorilized. Make him work for that oil. Several of these could break the already fragile US manpower situation, even with a draft in place.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'b')ut that isn't relevant since if they were US allies why would we invade them? Probably the Big Plan is to win this thing without any more shots fired than necessary. No doubt there are many meetings going on behind closed doors in these oil-exporting countries to figure out what to do. My guess is that US policy has been geared towards influencing those meetings.


As for this, I think youre right on all counts. All military options exaughsted, its time for some cunning. Understand, though, its far from guarunteed the US can convince the world to be afraid of it.
User avatar
El_Producto
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Delawhere
Top

Postby LadyRuby » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 22:19:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', 'I') would like to know how many of you who initially discovered "Peak Oil" did not feel fear and dispair.

Maybe you have a plan of action now, but if you tell me you do not still feel fear, then I tell you that you are a liar.


Mostly I've felt fear when I hear about the food-hoarding gun-stocking lunatics on this board!! :lol:

Seriously, though, I try to be optimistic that with good leadership (definitely not George W.), we can get through it. Fear and hoarding and guns won't be good for society.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US
Top

Re: Nothing to fear but fear itself

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 22:35:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
') Is the U.S., going to simultaneously kick ass on China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Venezuela?
That probably wouldn't work out too well. No but the idea might be to neutralize China's military and then play some kind of leadership role in the Post Peak world as the dominant and only global military power.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')The U.S. is the problem, and virtually every country in the world is starting to wake up to that.
I don't think these poll results which you may be refering to are going to matter much. The problem is the scarcity of oil. The projection of power is still respected as it always has been.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n Iraq, the U.S. is getting its ass handed to it on a plate. They are showing the entire world, in very clear terms, that they are a paper tiger and cannot win a war for oil.
There have been many instances in the past few decades which lend support to the idea that the US is a paper tiger. The real vulnerability of the US has been its pluralistic, democratic political institutions. If the American People don't want to fight or take loses, then the politicians will cut and run. I'm assuming that a real emergency, the Real Deal, the wolf is at the door and America knows it kind of thing will eliminate that problem. As far a Iraq goes, that's only a problem if a bunch of suicide bombers and head-chopping terrorists can intimidate the psyche of America. I don't think 'getting its ass handed to it on a plate' is an accurate assessment of the situation

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'i')f we are going to fight and take the oil, why aren't we taking Iraq's oil right now?
This doesn't seem to be a relevant question. Besides, didn't someone provide a link over in current events that showed that we are getting more of the oil from Iraq now that we used to when Saddaam was in charge?
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Nothing to fear but fear itself

Postby JohnDenver » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 23:08:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'T')he projection of power is still respected as it always has been.


The projection of power is entirely dependent on oil, and America has no oil. America is in the same situation Japan was in WWII, and it's just going to get worse. It's supply lines are very long, and originate in areas closer to likely enemies than to America. How is the U.S. going to defend those supply lines in the event of a hot war? You take out the export facilities in Saudi Arabia with a few surface-to-surface missile strikes, and the U.S. will immediately be convulsing with withdrawal symptoms. It's a catch-22. If the oil gets shut off, you can't project power.

For that matter, what's the contingency plan if Venezuela, Russia and Iran simply decide to shut off the tap one day?
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 23:31:40

True, JD. But China is in the same jam. In WWII the US was a military power that had plenty of oil. If China had lots of oil now, then they would have a big advantage. Instead, what they have is a lot of consumer-goods manufacturing plants and a pile of foreign currency reserves which may turn out to be worthless in the Post Peak world. This situation may be lose-lose for everybody, but if a resource war does loom, then there will have to be some kind of outcome and my thoughts posted here could be the way it plays out. After all, the US does have the miltary hardware now, and China is playing catch-up. Plus the US miltary R&D is way ahead, at this time. Kind of makes the next 12 months seem spooky, doen't it? Things seem to be coming to a head.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Postby JohnDenver » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 02:18:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'B')ut China is in the same jam. In WWII the US was a military power that had plenty of oil. If China had lots of oil now, then they would have a big advantage.


Why are you so hung up on China? America has plenty of enemies and rivals. Personally, I find the most plausible scenario to be one where the rest of the world gangs up on the U.S. and brings it to heel.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his situation may be lose-lose for everybody, but if a resource war does loom, then there will have to be some kind of outcome and my thoughts posted here could be the way it plays out.


I'm not really committed to one scenario or another. What do I know?
On the other hand, if the U.S. is playing a serious chess game here, then they better approach it like chess. You have to play assuming that your opponent will make the most devastating move available. You can't just hope that he won't notice his advantage.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 02:32:10

I'm no more hung up on China than you apparently are hung up on taking America down. China is aggressively trying to counter American military might with a force of its own. They are out for their own interests there is no reason why I should expect them not to do so. The point is that they are in a position to do so where nobody else is. So its just a matter of discussing what the future may hold in store. Your chess analogy is a good one, maybe you could come up with some slick moves for us to discuss instead of empty emotional rhetoric.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Postby Ayoob » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 02:34:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'B')ut China is in the same jam. In WWII the US was a military power that had plenty of oil. If China had lots of oil now, then they would have a big advantage.


Why are you so hung up on China? America has plenty of enemies and rivals. Personally, I find the most plausible scenario to be one where the rest of the world gangs up on the U.S. and brings it to heel.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his situation may be lose-lose for everybody, but if a resource war does loom, then there will have to be some kind of outcome and my thoughts posted here could be the way it plays out.


I'm not really committed to one scenario or another. What do I know?
On the other hand, if the U.S. is playing a serious chess game here, then they better approach it like chess. You have to play assuming that your opponent will make the most devastating move available. You can't just hope that he won't notice his advantage.


JD,

Please go pound sand up your ass.

Thank you.

-Everybody
User avatar
Ayoob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby JohnDenver » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 04:03:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ayoob', 'J')D,

Please go pound sand up your ass.

Thank you.

-Everybody


Ayoob, why don't you come back when you have a substantive point to make instead of a 4th grade butthole joke.

Thanks,
-John D.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby I_Like_Plants » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 04:07:54

Much of the rest of the world "ganging up on" the US is a very easy to imagine scenario, after all, that's how the Nazis and Japanese were beat in WWII. Deprive 'em of resources, keep 'em fighting, and watch 'em collapse.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Postby Macsporan » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 04:13:27

What about fear of fearing the fear of fear? Why doesn't anyone talk about that, hey?

Or fear of fearing the fear of fearing the fear of fear?

Well???
User avatar
Macsporan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu 09 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Postby gego » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 04:43:30

One interesting thing that I once read was that fear is a defense against shock. Shock is much more harmful to the body plus it has a tendency to freeze our response to danger. Fear helps us to better respond to known danger, so I would say that it is better to be fearful of peak oil consequences rather than to be unprepared and be shocked by them.

Roosevelt may have thought his little line was catchy, but it seems to have little meaning.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Doly » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 04:50:52

The difference between fear and panic is that if you're frightened, you think there's something you can do about it (if only to run away). If you are panicking, you think there's nothing you can do. I read once that panic is the response that happens when you've tried the rational answer, and the rational answer doesn't work, so you go irrational.

Let's hope the world doesn't go into collective panic.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Postby Zentric » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 05:50:32

JohnDenver -

I believe I understand what you are fighting for. To summarize, and correct me if I'm wrong, you believe the structure of America is broken, as is the role it is supposed to be playing on the world stage. That the people inside the country are misguided, but, still, in spite of it all, they should be saved from the horrors that are in store.

The structure of America should be about the Constitution and compassion for humanity. But we've gone badly astray.

We should be projecting our high ideals to others in foreign lands, but we're failing now even at doing this domestically.

We consume too much, and we are structured only to consume more, and the finances and resources required for this to continue are destined to bring about domestic and worldwide misery. But we can't stop ourselves!

A world wide massive die off is unacceptable to you - and bravo to you if that is what you truly believe because it is not a foregone conclusion - even though now this does seem likely.

That if we find a way to radically change our leadership (where the business as usual demos and repubs are all terribly, terribly suspect in my opinion), implement a few austerity measures to effectively allow many of us to chill out at home and not waste resources, and without severe hunger or financial penalty for doing so, then maybe the country and the globe can avoid catastrophe.

Amnesty for the plutocrats, politicians and middle management suck-ups who led us to where we are now? Uhhhm, maybe.

Explain to the born again Christians that Armageddon may have to be postponed another several years? Myself, I know of no rational person who would qualify as a 'messenger' to these people. Not entirely incomprehensible though.

Introduce an ethical and pragmatic means to ramp down the human population? Third rail, man. Good luck.

All in all, you're making progress, John. Please let the debate continue.
User avatar
Zentric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon 14 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby alpha480v » Wed 06 Jul 2005, 05:53:23

It's interesting to listen to all the arm-chair general talk that is going on in this thread about what might,or might not happen.The bottom line is,no war for resources on a global scale is going to be conducted by the United States without a draft in place.We simply do not have the manpower.This fact alone makes all these scenarios irrelevant.
User avatar
alpha480v
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat 29 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Western NY

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron