by Outcast_Searcher » Sat 20 Jun 2015, 17:18:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', '
')So I really only see two routes for anyone with a spec of ethics in remaining in their bodies:
1) Go vegan (or nearly so)
2) Promote veganism (and near-veganism) even more adamantly than the most obsessive vegan so that there will be more meat to go around for you as someone who lacks the cojones to give up the bloody flesh.
But mostly people are sorely lacking in even a spec of ethics, apparently. Especially when it comes to their sacred 'right' to eat creatures with faces.
Or people with a speck of brains (who know how to spell it, and that speck (i.e. a tiny spot) is different than spec. (i.e. short for specification in technical areas like I/T)) might think differently.
For example, many people (like me) have considered the ethical situation of having to eat (formerly) living things to survive, and concluded that being alive is more important than having faces. So, if you really want to be ETHICAL, IMO, you can choose:
1). To starve to death based on the principle that you refuse to consume formerly living things.
2). To eat but not waste food, since that is your nature and you must do so to survive, and if there is some moral hazard, it lies with the "creator" (if such a thing exists). In my case, I prefer to support the humane treatment (and killing) of the animals I eat.
There are many ways to think about the world and try to be ethical, even if it doesn't match person X's way of thinking.
As for the ethics of being vegan to prevent AGW gases -- I'll go with the discussion above in this thread where when people stop driving 99 kazillion miles in gas guzzlers, living in mcmansions, and generally consuming all they can (with borrowed money) to maximize pleasure for today (and to Hell with the planet) -- THEN it may be time to consider altering human diets to save the planet. Meanwhile folks like me who actively choose to maintain a low carbon footprint are FAR ahead of the preening vegan crowd in actual GHG reduction.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.