by Newfie » Thu 15 Jan 2015, 08:54:03
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '?')...
Actually you are only half right with your pessimism. I personally have spent much of my life working for a sustainable future, personally, on the ground, with my own money and time. Collaborative housing, paperless office (as a programmer), organic food industry, city living, and now a suburban doomstead (only possible in Humboldt). If we as a nation had half the commitment and imagination that I do, then we'd be halfway to salvation.
In retrospect I was actually surprised at the tome of my post. Obviously I have some bitterness on this topic.
We have something in common having spent large portions of our lives toward an improved and more sustainable world. One of the reasons I went into transit was that I thought is was part of the solution, that I would be "doing good" and decreasing pollution, working toward a better life. I can see how I was attracted to the ideas.
Yet, over the decades, I came to see my career as more creating the problem than of offering a solution.
Let's say you develop an improved fertilizer, so you double crop yield. Great! Only if you also limit population growth. Otherwise you end up with the same distribution of wealth, aka food, and twice as many hungry folks. It's the same argument with building highways, you have congestion, so you add lanes, which brings more cars, and you get the same congestion, with twice as many people.
At the end of the day all you are really doing is supporting GROWTH.
To offer any real solution you need to first attack the DEMAND problem. Once that is stabilized then you can work on mitigation strategies. If you do it the other way around, as we have proven time and time again, then the demand just grows and eats into any improvements you have made.
The problem electrification solves is...first......
Diesel fumes in confined spaces......tunnels.
It can also be efficient for certain high demand operations, dedicated coal runs for example, or on high grades.
It is also relatively quiet, and less obtrusive in an urban environment. But that is quality of life, not so much economics.
So, yes, electrification has some limited advantages. Effecting peak oil is not one of them.
I could easily go on, and on, over the falicies perpetrated but I'll stop for now. The arguments are just too broadly stated to address sucientlcly.
Good luck with your sustainability efforts, I think that working small scale, on things that you can touch and directly effect, and which have some form of tangible payback is a more emotionally sustainable approach. I applaud you.