Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 15 Jan 2015, 08:27:56

Just installing the radio, on board computer and screens for PTC is often a challange.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 15 Jan 2015, 08:54:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '?')...

Actually you are only half right with your pessimism. I personally have spent much of my life working for a sustainable future, personally, on the ground, with my own money and time. Collaborative housing, paperless office (as a programmer), organic food industry, city living, and now a suburban doomstead (only possible in Humboldt). If we as a nation had half the commitment and imagination that I do, then we'd be halfway to salvation.


In retrospect I was actually surprised at the tome of my post. Obviously I have some bitterness on this topic.

We have something in common having spent large portions of our lives toward an improved and more sustainable world. One of the reasons I went into transit was that I thought is was part of the solution, that I would be "doing good" and decreasing pollution, working toward a better life. I can see how I was attracted to the ideas.

Yet, over the decades, I came to see my career as more creating the problem than of offering a solution.

Let's say you develop an improved fertilizer, so you double crop yield. Great! Only if you also limit population growth. Otherwise you end up with the same distribution of wealth, aka food, and twice as many hungry folks. It's the same argument with building highways, you have congestion, so you add lanes, which brings more cars, and you get the same congestion, with twice as many people.

At the end of the day all you are really doing is supporting GROWTH.

To offer any real solution you need to first attack the DEMAND problem. Once that is stabilized then you can work on mitigation strategies. If you do it the other way around, as we have proven time and time again, then the demand just grows and eats into any improvements you have made.

The problem electrification solves is...first......
Diesel fumes in confined spaces......tunnels.

It can also be efficient for certain high demand operations, dedicated coal runs for example, or on high grades.

It is also relatively quiet, and less obtrusive in an urban environment. But that is quality of life, not so much economics.

So, yes, electrification has some limited advantages. Effecting peak oil is not one of them.

I could easily go on, and on, over the falicies perpetrated but I'll stop for now. The arguments are just too broadly stated to address sucientlcly.

Good luck with your sustainability efforts, I think that working small scale, on things that you can touch and directly effect, and which have some form of tangible payback is a more emotionally sustainable approach. I applaud you.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Peak Oil Barrel: Peak Oil 2015

Unread postby Subjectivist » Thu 15 Jan 2015, 09:02:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('toolpush', 'T')hanks Sub,

I finally got around to watching. There is a lot of familiar equipment there. The EMD V16 engine, are very similar to what we are running on the rig I am currently on. Though ours have been upgraded with turbos and are hooked up to 2,250kw generators. We have three of which two normally gives us enough power for drilling.
An amazing thing about these old EMDs, is the fact they burn so much oil during operation, they don't actually require oil changes, due to the fact of the top ups are greater than crankcase volume. Also If there are any problems with a cylinder, then you can change out the complete "power pack", Cylinder, piston and rod plus the top end in a few hours, and the rest of the engine stays intact. They are bullet proof engines, but gobble fuel,and are not real eco friendly.
I was disappointed they didn't mention the anything about the drive motors apart from the fact they existed. At 1700 hp and built in the 1950, I would presume 2x GE 752 DC traction motors. These motors put out about 800hp each.
They didn't mention any details of the new gensets that were being installed, but they must still be governed by the fact there are still only 2x 800hp drive motors, so this loco has improved fuel and pollution, but not upgraded in anyway power wise, and still using DC, rather than AC.
As for your comment about duel fuel, electric/diesel. You will notice there was very little wasted or spare space in the loco. Any HV equipment will take a fair bunch of room, just for insulation reasons.
Big toys for big boys?


I am just a rail fan, not any kind of an expert but some things I do know. That GP9 they rebuilt in the video has 4 electric motors, not 2, one on each axel. Have you heard of yard slugs? Locomotives are designed so that when they are hooked together all you need is a wiring harness connection and the front locomotive set of controls will operate all of the engines together. This was originally done to save money on crews, one crew can run 2-5 locomotives instead of each having its own crew. This lead to two other developments, 'B' locomotives with no cab or crew amenities like heating/cooling/restroom, and yard slugs. A yard slug is a frame with electric drive motors but no diesel generator or engine. How it works is a crewed Locomotive connects to the yard slug and shares electric power from its genset with the slug. The slug has ballast of steel or concrete to give it the same traction as a regular locomotive. By connecting a slug to a locomotive you can get twice the torque but only half the speed, very useful in switching yards where you need low speed and high torque to switch units between trains.

What I picture is something like an overhead electric 'B' unit, a small slug like unit that would draw power from overhead wires and feed it to the lead Locomotives motors. Something that looks kind of like,
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... ectric.JPG

Instead of a regular yard slug that looks like
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... 4_Slug.jpg
Last edited by Tanada on Thu 15 Jan 2015, 09:25:45, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: fixed image links
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Thu 15 Jan 2015, 09:44:13

Once you understand that the planet's ecology cannot be saved as long as the population that is 6.3+ billion humans in overshoot remains present, you are approaching the end of your philosophical journey.

Now you must choose. You can knowingly become a champion and advocate of either Humanity or of the Earth. You cannot serve both goals, they are mutually exclusive.

Realize also that YOU didn't do this. Your fate was sealed by the 200-odd years of joyful population overshoot that was perpetrated on this globe by your ancestors. The only difference between you and them is that - thanks to that single massive surge of productivity and the resulting gleeful gluttony that is brought about by modern technology - primarily the implementation of artificial intelligence engines and massive online databases - you are a member of that generation that has both the availability of the data and the leisure time to reflect upon the fundamental tragedy of our existence.

There are now two possible outcomes resulting from our present situation, both about equally likely in my estimation:

1) The continued presence of 7.3 billion humans completes the ecological destruction that began around 1805 when that sustainable population number was passed. The number of species extinctions continues to grow, and the Earth suffers mightily as every exploitable resource is depleted to the max. All accessible supplies of clean water, arable soils, and fossil energy are exploited at greater and greater cost and with greater and greater impact, in an accelerating death spiral of gleeful human consumption. The Earth becomes even more of a dirty, smelly, and overcrowded hellhole than it is today. Then everybody dies. The highest form of life left are small mammals, the evolutionary remnants of rats, now no bigger than tiny mice. All of human knowledge remains intact, our complete and brief existence as a self-aware technological race remains present in a secure and complete archive, a cautionary tale that very likely nobody will ever see.

2) All of the above happens, and mankind survives the end of the Earth as the first extra-planetary species, evolving into the virtually endless spaces and virtually endless resources off of the Earth's surface. A select few individuals - an insignificant tiny fraction of one percent of the humans, are the ancestors of all the survivors. As long as there are 3500+ carefully selected individuals, we preserve the DNA of the entire race, even those who deny to their last breath that survival off the planet is possible or desirable.

Either way, in a few million years the Earth heals, new minerals are exposed by geological forces, and an entirely new set of species populates a renewed globe with a new planetary ecology. There may or may not be records of human civilization remaining, off of the Earth's surface in space. The new intelligent species may be mammalian, reptile, amphibian, or insect in nature - or a pattern for which present humans have no name.

The age of humans on Earth is ending. A new chapter of the Earth's story is beginning.

By the way, I have loved trains since I was a boy. Live steam rules!
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 15 Jan 2015, 19:16:09

If you want to have a discussion on electrification then yu need to break things down into catagories, some make more sense than others.
Class1 freights
Short lines
Heavy, long distance commuter
Local commuter rail
Subways and elevated lines
Interurbans, trollies and the like

Gas,

In the US lines are goverened by the Federal Railroad Administration (some commuter operations are here) or the Federal Transit Administration, most commuter, subway, trollyies, bus stuff. FRA has a hands on role and inspects and monitors. FTA requires states to set up agencies, who farm out the regulation to the transit authority. Works as well as you would expect.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby toolpush » Thu 15 Jan 2015, 22:05:01

Sub,

I have had a quick look around. You are correct with the 4 drive motors. Obviously a bit smaller than we use on the rig. I found a workshop manual you maybe interested in. I will look at it tomorrow.
http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/manual/gp9-master.html
I see most JP9s are being used as switchers. So the idea of 3 gen sets makes a lot more sense now. Run empty between jobs on one genset, hook up, and use the number of gensets that are required.
toolpush
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon 06 Jan 2014, 09:49:16

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 00:36:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', 'S')orry about that vtsnowedin, got my east & west confused !!
The West coast is the one by the Eastern Pacific.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', 'W')hat I found funny was the uniformed guy outside the White House with his Alsatian dog, which was wearing a dog vest emblazoned "SECRET POLICE" - (Thought - ha-ha, dog, - your secret is blown !!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Image
the-humor-thread-pt-2-merged-t65634-80.html#p1229894
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 09:11:47

I am not so doom obsessed that I think the world will be inherited by rats or cockroaches. I think the real peak in oil production and the decline over the next decades will bring an end of population growth and start the die off of billions but it will take a couple of decades which puts it past my own personnel horizon. In the US that will mean an end of oil imports and having to get by on our own production which will also be declining. So some year in the future we will get by on six million barrels a day instead of the nineteen mbd we waste now. That would not be the end of the world for us by any measure. Freight moved by truck would be reduced to , back and forth between source and the nearest rail head and single occupancy auto commuting would be as rare as hens teeth. Agriculture would continue much as it is today with the exception of corn to ethanol which will finally be realized as a net loss.
Species in the forest and jungles of the world would see easing in the pressure against them as human populations decline and environmental damage will wind down to a stop.
Once the decline is understood by the majority the competition will be in planning ahead and seeking alternatives that use less energy but accomplish the same task. Insulation of buildings vs. oil burned just for heat. Buildings built next to generating stations to use the cooling water as a heat source etc. We will explore and build out to the limits of wind , tide and PV power and get what we can from them.
Once we stop importing oil we will return to isolationist policies and let wars in Asia and Africa and even Europe run their course without getting involved and we will prevent refugees from these wars from immigrating into the US.
We will live in interesting times. :roll:
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby Revi » Fri 16 Jan 2015, 09:21:42

It would be nice to have a train to take from most places. Here in Maine the train stops at Brunswick now, but could be extended to Augusta, the capitol at least. There are weird things like the fact that everyone has to get out at North Station in Boston and take 2 t subways to get back on the train at South Station. What is up with that? Meanwhile they spent billions to get cars through with the Big Dig. Go figure!
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby Tanada » Sat 17 Jan 2015, 14:27:23

I am a mostly lurking member on a rail fan board, http://railroadfan.com/phpbb/ so I asked the real deep in the knowledge people over there what they think of Electrification for USA/Canada Railroads. Some think it is highly likely because the cost of moving freight with electricity has only gone up 150 percent compared to the 250 percent increase in diesel rates over the last decade. Others state it is far too expensive to maintain on spurs where businesses bare the costs of rail for their interchange with the networks. Now a third group has piped up predicting that Tesla battery technology will make it possible for spur operations to operate on battery slugs where having cantenary wires is impractical.

Will we ever become electrified? Beats me, I think a great deal depends on who can afford to do what over the new quarter century. But the conversation is, as always, the interesting part. As Pops quote says, Planning is everything, the plan is nothing. By planning you make yourself look at any problem from many different angles and come up with solutions for all the angles you can see. Then whatever plan you make can be adapted or replaced if circumstances change.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby dashster » Sun 18 Jan 2015, 08:49:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'S')ome think it is highly likely because the cost of moving freight with electricity has only gone up 150 percent compared to the 250 percent increase in diesel rates over the last decade.


But I wonder what electricity rates will be like in the future. There are some people who think natural gas in the United States is going to peak in production way before they think it will. How about a steam engine that burns garbage? Should have plenty of cheap fuel for that vehicle.
dashster
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 385
Joined: Fri 28 Dec 2012, 08:39:24
Location: California
Top

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby Subjectivist » Sun 18 Jan 2015, 09:42:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dashster', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'S')ome think it is highly likely because the cost of moving freight with electricity has only gone up 150 percent compared to the 250 percent increase in diesel rates over the last decade.


But I wonder what electricity rates will be like in the future. There are some people who think natural gas in the United States is going to peak in production way before they think it will. How about a steam engine that burns garbage? Should have plenty of cheap fuel for that vehicle.


Sounds like Mr. Fusion from Back To The Future.

IMO better to burn the trash in a municipal power plant and put the energy into the grid. That way you can use it for anything electrical, not just as a point power source.

Shale gas seems to be very abundant, yet America still imports ten percent of its natural gas from Canada and exports a few percent to Mexico through that new pipeline. As oil peaks associated gas will decline, but that should not effect shale gas at all. Some shale gas has been in production for a century, so the tail is very long in those fields. At least I read that somewhere, it is hard to separate statements from industry and the media/bloggers sometimes.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio
Top

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Sun 18 Jan 2015, 09:59:36

sub - "...so the tail is very long in those fields." In deed. There are New Albany Shale wells in KY still producing after many decades. Some are selling as much as $30 of NG every day. LOL.

The big shales, like the Haynesville in E Texas, suffer the same high decline rates as the oil shales. When prices again get high enough they get drilled again. But just like the Eagle Ford the NG prices will have to stay high so rapidly depleting NG wells can constantly be replaced. Boom...chicken...egg...crash...repeat.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 18 Jan 2015, 10:02:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')lass1 freights
Short lines
Heavy, long distance commuter
Local commuter rail
Subways and elevated lines
Interurbans, trollies and the like


Tanda,

The problem is the conversation is too wide to be meaningful. You need to narrow it to make sense. That's why I offered the above list, the answer is different for each.

Amtrak ran freight off the NEC in order to have more room for their high speed passenger service. Those two things don't mix well from a schedule and planning point of view. And heavy freights tear up a high speed passenger ROW. Yu might see some high speed passenger trains, simply because of the public perception that they fix some problem. In fact, it's just a big subsidy for the upper middle class.

Expansion of trollys makes a lot more sense. Cities are becoming much more dense, Electic propulsion is quiet, and less polluting. Regular fixed runs through town can be useful.

Freights? Never.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby dashster » Sun 18 Jan 2015, 10:23:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', '
')
IMO better to burn the trash in a municipal power plant and put the energy into the grid. That way you can use it for anything electrical, not just as a point power source.


But you could save having to electrify the line, assuming it is even possible to put a garbage car behind a locomotive and power it.

I worked for a company that started burning their trash for electricity. I can't remember when it was but I would say over 20 years ago. They even started burning garbage that the city would bring in rather than landfill. Then it went away. Someone that had worked on it told me later that he felt it got canceled due to repeated mechanical failures causing a constant backup of garbage and the smell got to people. But seems like every municipality should be burning garbage for electricity like that, rather than landfilling it. I guess there is some good reason they aren't. But that would go into the "biomass" category that you see growing over the years on pie charts, so maybe it is becoming more common.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Shale gas seems to be very abundant, yet America still imports ten percent of its natural gas from Canada and exports a few percent to Mexico through that new pipeline. As oil peaks associated gas will decline, but that should not effect shale gas at all. Some shale gas has been in production for a century, so the tail is very long in those fields. At least I read that somewhere, it is hard to separate statements from industry and the media/bloggers sometimes.


I just bought a book called "Cold, Hungry and in the Dark: Exploding the Natural Gas Supply Myth". In it the author talks about shale in New York and Appalachia that has natural fractures that they tapped into in a normal way a long time ago and gas did flow through the natural fractures for a very long time. But he says that is different from this shale where they have to make fractures.
dashster
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 385
Joined: Fri 28 Dec 2012, 08:39:24
Location: California
Top

Re: Trains (from PO 2015 thread)

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 18 Jan 2015, 11:30:19

So here's a suggestion that takes no technology at all. It could be done tomorrow, and is very progressive.

Make mass transit FREE.

Transit is a public monopoly, which should be employed for the mutual benefit.

Transit fares amount to an extra tax on the poor, for they are the most common riders. You want to put the poor to work? Let them ride for free. God knows, the ride is log enough, why then force them to pay? Upon a minimum wage part time job, transit becomes a significant burden.

Also, from a capital point of view it makes sense. We spend a lot of money building infrastructure, but then charge money which keeps that infrastructure from reaching its full potential. To get the best return we should be looking how to maximize its use.

Also, fare collection itself is very expensive, something like 30% of the fare box goes for collecting the fares. Automated card systems claim to do marginally better. Still a dollar loss in fare is only 70 to 80 cents lost in revenue.

In Philly the School District (the City) has to pay SEPTA (the City for the kids to ride the bus. How stupid is that?

The list of benefits to making transit go far beyond what I have listed, and run the list of green and Progressive agendas. It requires only political will.

Yet we see no movement in this direction. Why?
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron