Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Newfie » Sun 11 Nov 2012, 22:56:18

And half the income.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat gives you the answer - the world's average salary is $1,480 (£928) a month, which is just less than $18,000 (£11,291) a year.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17512040

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Per capita money income in past 12 months (2010 dollars) 2006-2010 $27,334

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

So, even if we ALL took a 50% cut we would still be well above average.

So there you go, all we have to do is to learn to live a little more like the rest of the world.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Quinny » Mon 12 Nov 2012, 04:47:30

Yes - I used to earn 6 figure salary but was no happier than now. Enjoy food and other basic pleasures better now than ever.
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby AdTheNad » Mon 12 Nov 2012, 05:53:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'A')nd half the income.

Half the income is only a problem for the individual, if they can't cut their expenses by the amount they lose. Income taxes due would fall automatically, but the mortgage payments and property tax in many cases wouldn't. The only way to have lower mortgage payments is if house prices were less, and big finance will do anything they can to prevent that.

The rent seekers need to keep the unearned income flowing, and an army of debt slaves on the books.
AdTheNad
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed 22 Dec 2010, 07:47:48

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Tanada » Mon 12 Nov 2012, 08:25:49

Certainly is, my Mortgage and car note are based on a 40 hour a week middling pay rate, a 28 hour a week replacement at a lower pay rate means I will need two part time jobs and be working 56 hours a week just to pay the same bills.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Newfie » Mon 12 Nov 2012, 08:36:07

Not to poke at you guys, and I understand there are reasons, and you can call me hypocrite, but to make the argument......

Some of the problem comes from adjusting your expenses to your income level based on 40 hours.

What we need to do is adjust our expenses to a reduced income level.

That is easier said than done, and it is not easily accomplished on a personal basis. Once you need a car, you need a car, doesn't matter if the commute is 3 days a week or 5.

Public transit has the same problem when doing repair work. If you keep a system down for a sufficiently long time then riders buy a car, and they never come back. In order to get folks onto a train you need to promise a very high level of reliability and convenience, if you are to compete with the personal vehicle.

We are products of our culture, and our culture tells us to spend and consume to keep the engine growing. You hear that even today. Part of that is we need to work, WORK, WORK!

It's easy for me to be critical. I make above average wages and can afford to take time off. Yet many, most, of my coworkers spend every dime they have and work themselves to the bone. So while money is part of the issue, it is not all of the issue. Some of it comes down to dumping the consumer life style.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby AdTheNad » Mon 12 Nov 2012, 10:04:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'W')hat we need to do is adjust our expenses to a reduced income level.

...

It's easy for me to be critical. I make above average wages and can afford to take time off. Yet many, most, of my coworkers spend every dime they have and work themselves to the bone. So while money is part of the issue, it is not all of the issue. Some of it comes down to dumping the consumer life style.

This is possible only to an extent - as you state - but even if you could get by without a car, the main problem for people younger than baby boomers seems to be house prices. There is only so much you can do about the rent/ mortgage, when there are 10 people standing behind you willing to take on 8 times a couples' dual income in debt keeping house prices exorbitant. It doesn't matter how low you get your variable expenses, if fixed expenses are above what a part time income can provide.

Accept the debt yourself and become debt slave, pay rent you have little choice over or move to cheaper places out in the suburbs where drops in price correspond with an increase in commuting time and costs.

I agree with all your views regarding how pointless many jobs are, and would love to be able to work part time. But I was born too late and house prices were already too high to make it a possibility for me. My wife and I are currently childless with 2 fairly decent incomes and only run 1 car so we are far from extravagant.

I could choose to live on a boat, but safety concerns (I haven't 100% ruled out a zombie apocalypse), and not having even the postage stamp of land I currently do to grow a couple of veggies on prevents this.

AND, I think my situation is pretty good and I am lucky I'm not under 18 today, since those guys are getting the shaft even harder.
AdTheNad
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed 22 Dec 2010, 07:47:48
Top

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby AgentR11 » Mon 12 Nov 2012, 11:26:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdTheNad', 'I') could choose to live on a boat, but safety concerns (I haven't 100% ruled out a zombie apocalypse), and not having even the postage stamp of land I currently do to grow a couple of veggies on prevents this.


Is there a reason you couldn't live on a boat, and own some agriculture only land nearby?
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby AdTheNad » Mon 12 Nov 2012, 11:56:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'I')s there a reason you couldn't live on a boat, and own some agriculture only land nearby?

I don't own any agricultural land now, because England is small, and land here is expensive. We have a tiny little garden which would feed me for about a day in a zombie apocalypse, but at least I am learning actual skills on it.

I'm not on the coast, so a boat means a canal boat, and I just don't think they are very secure. I don't know how bad things will get, if at all, but would you want to be on a canal boat in Argentina from the time period ferfal wrote about? The likelihood of that happening within the next 30 years is certainly high enough for me to conclude a house, even at bend over prices, is the best option.

Most people live in houses and not boats for a reason, and while there are people it is perfect for, it wouldn't work for us. I'm fairly sure they need a fair bit of R&M as well, so it's not even like a boat is the cheap easy option.

Back mildly more on topic, it would take legislation to make a 35 hour work week viable. However, if everyone worked 20 hours a week without legislation forcing them to, the incentives for each individual to work just a little bit longer than everyone else to earn more money, and buy into a better neighbourhood for the best schools for their little precious would be too great. It would be almost impossible to design legislation to force people to work 20 hours a week without incredible unforeseen circumstances and foreseen negative effects, so no one would vote for it.

Maybe Agent is onto something with his Obamacare being the only way to legislate a part time work force theory - though that is still not by an individual's choosing, and rather being forced by companies. And I would strongly doubt it was designed for that purpose.
AdTheNad
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed 22 Dec 2010, 07:47:48
Top

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby SeaGypsy » Mon 12 Nov 2012, 12:50:26

I can't see any major holes in Agent's theory of Obamaism's agenda.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Newfie » Mon 12 Nov 2012, 15:45:51

Wife somewhere heard a story about GB health insurance. Went like this, after WWII there were some labor shortages, there were also wage restrictions, so to sweeten the pot medical insurance was given as a bonus.

However, they quickly recognized that by giving medical insurance they realized that they were making people more dependent, and tied, to their jobs. More enslavement.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Quinny » Tue 13 Nov 2012, 15:58:47

Don't really get your point Newfie. Free healthcare was universal even if you didn't have a job.
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Pops » Tue 13 Nov 2012, 16:33:32

Actually the idea of employer based insurance is an American invention that took place during WWII wage controls and labor shortages. It turned out to be a huge tax subsidy to employers and gave them great leverage over labor. All the other modern economies at the time were developing national health care but we continue to subsidize employer based, for profit medicine to this day and still wonder why we have a hard time competing.

Doesn't anyone ever wonder why groups like the Chamber are against every possible requirement or regulation that impinges on profit but they battle tooth and nail to KEEP paying for employee's insurance?


http://archive.truthout.org/121508R
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Newfie » Tue 13 Nov 2012, 18:49:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', 'D')on't really get your point Newfie. Free healthcare was universal even if you didn't have a job.


Maybe one of us heard it wrong. I'll throw her under the bus since she doesn't read this anyway.

Sounds like she heard something along the lines of what Pops is saying.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') Many of the problems of American health care grow out of this history. The system is so complex that even experts - let alone ordinary people trying to find care for themselves and their loved ones - are unable to fully understand it. The system spends one-third of its cost on paperwork, waste and profit over and above the cost of actually providing health care. Yet, nearly one-third of Americans are without health insurance over the course of a year. In all other developed countries, more than 85 percent of citizens have health coverage under public programs. The American health care system is full of inequalities: People who work for one company may have high quality insurance, while those who work for a similar company have none.

All of these problems are due at least in part to an employer-based system, the original intent of which was not to provide quality health care to all, but to circumvent wartime wage regulations.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Quinny » Wed 14 Nov 2012, 06:59:16

I believe the US health industry/professionals attack the NHS because of the value for money socialised medicine gives us. We don't really get people going bankrupt and losing their home because of medical bills in the UK yet it costs us much less the the US health industry (so much for the efficiencies of capitalism).
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby AdTheNad » Wed 14 Nov 2012, 10:15:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', '(')so much for the efficiencies of capitalism).

Capitalism is very efficient at using all available resources as quick as possible, and maximising profit, no matter what the level of costs borne by others are.
AdTheNad
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed 22 Dec 2010, 07:47:48
Top

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Quinny » Wed 14 Nov 2012, 12:45:03

Some might say ab(using). Depends on what you mean by efficient as well. Competition needs duplication so that's a inefficiency built in straight away. Well managed public services are often more efficient and effective than those driven entirely by the market.
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Newfie » Wed 14 Nov 2012, 18:36:23

I don't think it is the physicians who are blocking NHS. It's the insurance companies.

About the housing, I don't know GB at all so hesitate to recommend. What we did was manage to get into a center city brownstone at a time when prices were depressed about 20 years ago. We had owned houses earlier but that's another story.

This house was subdivided into 4 apts, we live in one and rent three out. That now pays the mortgage and will hopefully contribute to our retirement. It was tricky getting the right place, took a lot of time researching. But even now with the housing downturn I could not repeat the success, base price is just too much and I'm getting too old to take on another fixer upper.

As to the canal boat idea, that may have more merit than you think. I would recommend tipping a few pints in pubs next to marinas. Depending on local conditions, depth of water in the canal, many things are possible.

Good luck.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby cephalotus » Fri 16 Nov 2012, 11:48:48

How to become independent of your high income full time job?

I will explain my view from the German perspective, the numbers would be different in other parts of the world. Numbers are rounded, give or take a few percent her or there, it does not matter.

From age 0-28 go to school, university, military, travel through the world and enjoy life, finish university with your savings at 0 Euro (you do not have to pay significant amounts and take a loan to study over here)

From age 28-33 work and live frugal. Start a full time job and get experience in the working world. You are young and maybe working and making a career is what you like. You can live frugal because you are used to it from being a student.
Let's say you earn 40,000 €/year. The government takes 16,000€ taxes, social services & Co. Use 12,000€ to live and save 12,000€.

This is the most important part of your (economic) life!!! If you don't get it right here in this 5 years you will work forever. Saving 1 Euro at age 30 is worth more than earning 10 Euro at age 60.

After 5 years you have 60.000€ of savings (in the current situation do not expect any significant interest rates, if you are a good investor, more power to you) and a happy livestyle that works well with limited amounts of money.

At 33 you move together with your (girl)friend, who also earns 40,000€/year and also saved 60,000€

Use your 120,000€ and buy yourself a small apartment/home which maybe costs 150.000€, so you have a mortgage of -30,000 Euro now.

Time to get some children.
---

One of you can now stay at home and will get "parants benefits" which are around 2/3rds of your old income (after taxes) = 16,000€. After one year he/she gets the same in unemployment benefits for another year. This income is enough to pay for the mortgage for your home.

The other person now can work half time and will earn 20,000€/year. Taxes now are very low, so you get maybe 16,000€ + some benefits for your children, so let's assume 18,000€ / year. You do not have to pay rent or credit rates...
This should be enough to life a happy life.

You still have health care for all members of your family.

The only "disadvantage" is that your saving rates for retirement will be quite low, but why should you care about this at an age under 40? And you really own housing property.

If you would prefer a 3/4rd time job or 1/2 time job + a 400€ job, or two 1/2 times jobs you would have more money available than you need. You have all choices between work and life balance that you like. You can also take this low paying job if you like to. You do not NEED to earn the money of you 40,000€ job just to stay alive.

Living at 1500€/month (18,000€/year) for 2 adults + 2 children with your own apartment is not luxurious, but quite doable in my part of the world...

For comparison: The long term unemployment benefits for 2 adult + 2 little children in Germany is 1138 €/month (+rent, which you do not need + heating costs, which you need to pay + healthcare, which you also have).
cephalotus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue 18 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby Outcast_Searcher » Sat 17 Nov 2012, 01:29:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cephalotus', '
')Time to get some children.
---
One of you can now stay at home and will get "parants benefits" which are around 2/3rds of your old income (after taxes) = 16,000€.

cephalotus, your entire post made sense to me. I especially liked the clear-headed observation about HOW IMPORTANT the early savings (which can grow for your lifetime) are. Well done.

The part that I don't get (this may be US, libertarian bias talking) is the comment in red above. So you mean in Germany, if you have kids (how many?), you can say at home and the state PAYS YOU about $20,000 a year to raise them?

Considering we live in a world where overpopulation is almost certainly one of, if not THE biggest problem we have -- this is just BIZARRE to me.

Am I understanding this right? Can you outline a little about what the criteria are and how long this lasts? (i.e. X euros per child and Y years, or something completely different? If one chooses to work, do they lose part or all of this incentive NOT to work?)

Thanks in advance.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

Re: A 35 hour Workweek would create Millions of Jobs

Postby cephalotus » Sat 17 Nov 2012, 03:32:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '
')
The part that I don't get (this may be US, libertarian bias talking) is the comment in red above. So you mean in Germany, if you have kids (how many?), you can say at home and the state PAYS YOU about $20,000 a year to raise them?


No. You get "Elterngeld" during around 12+2 months either the man or the woman. You can stay at home during that time and will get roughly 2/3rds of your last income (after taxes).
The maximum is 1800€/month (=21.600€/year), the minimum is 300€/month (=3600€/year)

You have to pay lots of taxes over here, but you can also get the benefits, of course.

I did NOT promote to live on social security, just to use what is available. And during the first years working fulltime as a single you are a huge netto contributor to the system (which is ok, who else should pay?) and when you have children and don't want to work full time you will benefit from the system.
You pay very little for health care in such a case but your hole family will be covered.

That's how living a decent life without the full time job threadmill will work in a "socialist" country like Germany and of course it is just an example. I used quite average figures, nothing special and I also only suggested starting at age 28, which will give you plenty of time to discover the world (which for me is a very important factor for a nice life and seeing how others life is also very helpful to get an idea what you really need to be happy and what is just consumerism crap feed to your brain by millions of TV advertisements).

In the US you need a different strategy. You pay much less taxes and probably have a significantly higher income. On the other side you probably will start with some dept after your university time and you have to make other strategies to cover health care for a family.

But maybe it is understandable why I do not have a problem with our high tax rates, even if it is currently me who is paying for the system. I'm still working a full time (=40h/week, overtime= free time later) job, I didn't do as well in my early days than I suggested, I know it better now!

But I still to plan it as I said above, I just will modify the strategy a little bit.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Considering we live in a world where overpopulation is almost certainly one of, if not THE biggest problem we have -- this is just BIZARRE to me.


German women get 1,4 children in average, our population is shrinking.

We also believe that people with very young children should not need to work still they drop but have at least one year to take care about their child. You CAN work, if you want.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Am I understanding this right? Can you outline a little about what the criteria are and how long this lasts? (i.e. X euros per child and Y years, or something completely different? If one chooses to work, do they lose part or all of this incentive NOT to work?) .


It lasts for 12 months + 2 months for your partner. Women OR men can use it. After that you have to work again (or get another children).

You also have (around) 12 months of unemployment benefits (ALG I), which also is 2/3rds of your last income after taxes if you have children (60% if you do not). After this you get "ALG II" which only takes care for the basic monetary needs. It's around monthly 345€/adult (380€ for a single) and around 220-290€/child depending on the age. You also get an "appropriate" apartment and the heating costs and free health care. This is forever, because it's the defined minimum that is said to be needed to survive in our modern society. With your money you can do what you want. You can spend it on food or a flatcreen TV.

If you are on unemployment benefits (ALG I, but especially ALG II) you have to search for a new job and if they offer you a job which is appropriate for your qualification you have to go there for a job interview. They will also offer you "training courses" which you must participate. If you don't, they will cut your rates.

So I prefer not to be (long term) unemployed and dependent on the goodwill of the state and some accounting clerk, but other services like "Elterngeld" or "ALG I" are available for some time and why not use them, if it fits your strategy? You also pay for them.

Germany has 1-3 millions of long term unemployed workers mostly since reunification. Those people often have little qualification, some are addicted to alcohol and many simply lost the ability for a 8h/day job. Sad, but true.
We don't have enough low qualifying jobs for them which would enable them to live on their wages. We do not have people that pack your shopping bag in the supermarket. We do not want people to do this for us and we do not want to pay someone for this, cultural differences, I assume.

I rather pay them sitting at home in front of the TV than forcing them to do nonsense work.

The system also has disadvantages. We now have some families which live on benefits in their third generation, they never worked and never intend to do so, maybe on the black market.

If you know how, you can live with very little money in Germany. For example we have "die Tafel", where supermarkets bring their old or unsold food. In theory everyone can go there and buy a trolley of food for 1 Euro. You have limited options of course, but the quality is perfectly fine. Akaik you can go there every day, if you want.

You can buy 2nd hand clothes for very cheap or that Chinese made stuff for very small money. I do not suggest this, but is is doable.

If you live in the city you can do very well without having your own car. Everything is easily within biking distance (you even have the time to walk a few km a day), public transport is available in my city 24hs/day and if you really need a car just use one from a car sharing company, the next station is within 3 minutes walking distance from me. If you do not have a driving licence just use a taxi (=expensive), if you only rarely need a car.

It is easy to live here without participating in a treadmill, but in reality most people still do.

When people have their first well paying job after university they immediately stop to live the frugal student live and rent that new large apartment, buy fancy new furniture, buy a new car...
It is VERY difficult to cut back if you once are adopted to a certain living standard. Suddenly you need the car, suddenly you can not live in 50m² any more, but you now need 100m², because all your new furnitures and stuff have to fit in there.
People also tend to "invest" in very expensive homes which they need 20-40 years of credit and interest rates to pay. They buy that expensive and large house / apartment, because it is your "lifetime investment" and you can't go cheap here.
I say that this is nonsense. By the time you finally have paid of your home your children will be adults and when the thing finally belongs to you (after being a slave to the bank and your job for decades) it is to large for just two old adults.
People are hoping for early retirement to finally have some free time when they are old.

I prefer to have free time when I am young. I want to spend my free time when I have little children growing up, not with sitting lonely in front of the TV at age 70. On the other hand I will not mind to work a bit when I am old, as long as I am able work. (as an engineer sitting in front of a PC and a phone is all that I need to be able to do in the worst case).

Don't accumulate your free time at the end of your life when you probably will be alone and sick and when you would beg for something to do, but try to get -some- more free time when you really need it. For me this is now. You only have one life.

Do not enslave yourself to a certain "living standard" or a certain system. What your neighbour does is not what you need to do, too. Most of the people have been brainwashed by millions of TV advertisements showing you that a nice life is only possible when you spend all your money and work for it till you drop.This is bullshit.
Travel the world. See which people are happy with their life and which are not. Happiness never is related to the size of the car or the size of the kitchen. Never!

The bad thing is, that you have to realize this at the age of 30, better at the age of 25. If your are already a member of the system at age 35 and already in dept for your fancy home, having two little children and three cars sitting at home it would be next to impossible to go back.

(maybe this is why some people here seem to wish for TEOTWAWKI ?)

If someone has a 40h job and would not be able to live on the wage of a the same job cut to 35h I do feel very sorry for them. Imho you are a slave.

best regards
cephalotus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue 18 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Germany
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron