by kublikhan » Wed 07 Nov 2012, 23:26:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'W')hat should be troubling to the white/racist/republican crowd is that poor folks are being driven out of the core cities, further into the older suburbs, closer and closer to the White-Flight Zone. Now there is a recipe for, you know, a 'tense situation.' Am I glad I live behind the Redwood Curtain.
The original article I posted talks about this issue. The older inner ring suburbs are now increasingly included in the decay of the city. Middle class residents are fleeing to the newer outer ring of suburban development. Pretty sad model of development. Here's a more recent article on the subject if you were interested:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')ust as older Northeastern and Midwestern cities began their downward spiral in the 1950s, losing both population and relative wealth, now it's the turn of their first-ring suburbs.
Responding to evidence in recent Census reports, a gloomy audience at the Bloomington Arts Center on Wednesday night watched clips from two films by Andrea Torrice depicting the decline of 1950s-era suburbs near Philadelphia and Cincinnati. Panelists then lamented some of the same trends in Brooklyn Park, Richfield, Robbinsdale and other first-ring Twin Cities communities. Increasing poverty, crumbling infrastructure, struggling schools and abandoned strip malls were all part of the discussion, as were reductions in population, tax base and political influence.
Everyone seemed to agree that shifting racial patterns complicate the picture. As the new Census results show, African-Americans, Hispanics and East African immigrants are moving to the inner suburbs in large numbers, not only here but across the country. Their hopes for better schools and jobs, safer streets and tolerant attitudes aren't always realized, however.
Panelists Ahmed Adam Jama, a Somali-born businessman, and Melissa Krull, superintendent of Eden Prairie schools, discussed a bitter dispute over school boundaries that placed immigrants and some white families on opposites sides. It echoed the kinds of fights common in major cities 40 years ago.
Because the towns went up so rapidly after the Second World War, their infrastructures are crumbling all at once, he said. Taxes must rise in order to fix streets, parks and schools and to maintain police, trash pickup and other services. But if taxes rise, middle-class residents move farther out. As middle-class residents move, businesses and jobs follow. Ghost malls, weedy parking lots and rental houses appear. The tax base falls farther and decline becomes inevitable, especially as government budgets shrink to the bone and political clout shifts to the outer edge.
Decline as government policyBut there's another way to think about first-ring decline — and to imagine a solution.
Back in the 1950s, the decline and decay of older cities wasn't really an inevitable consequence of market forces, as most believe, but a product of deliberate federal policy. Congress authorized mortgage loans (GI and FHA) aimed at subsidizing returning servicemen and their families. The government also secured sources of cheap foreign oil and undertook the largest public works project in history — the Interstate highway system. The result was a massive social engineering project that encouraged middle-class whites to abandon cities and move to what became first-ring suburbs.
I'm not saying that Washington set out to punish older cities. Nor am I suggesting that no middle-class flight would have happened if not for federal subsidy. I am suggesting that federal policy aided and abetted the process. Those same policies remain in place today, along with zoning, taxing, lending and design practices that encourage developers to abandon old property and build on new ground farther out.