by AgentR11 » Mon 12 Nov 2012, 18:27:03
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('anador', 'I') live in Miami and I assure you, Street Trees make a huge difference.
That being said you still do get sweaty, fact of life I suppose.
I didn't say they didn't make a difference. I said they don't do jack to keep your clothes from getting soaked from sweat. Now, getting drenched in sweat is no big deal TO ME, but to an Office Guy in a suit... friggin disaster.
The reason I bring it up, is that it drops into a general problem of industrial behavior. If someone does not own a car, then lots of walkable, bike-able, even cab-able things make a lot of sense. But once that person buys a car, and especially a car with high efficiency, where the additional cost / mile is a small portion of cost of ownership; you get into the situation of: "I live in a walkable neighborhood, but I'm driving the half mile to the grocery store." It breaks the model. It does still LOOK nifty of course, which is good enough for sales trendiness and economic growth promotion; but in the end, I think a lot will fail to meet expectations. Their future residents will drive everywhere, just as they do where ever they are now.
Maybe I'm just overly cynical from experience, but I lived urban, in a very walkable setting. No one walked. They would drive their cars to cross the street; 100yds at MOST. Walk ? no. Go downstairs, get out of the gate, around the complex, cross the street, park, in to store. Even when it indisputably would take longer to drive than walk, they still drove.