Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE United Nations (UN) Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Doomerish UN report

Unread postby dohboi » Thu 07 Jul 2011, 17:50:26

from the report:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t is rapidly expanding energy use, mainly driven by fossil fuels, that explains why humanity is on the verge of breaching planetary sustainability boundaries through global warming, biodiversity loss, and disturbance of the nitrogen-cycle balance and other measures of the sustainability of the earth’s ecosystem


Interesting that they are miming much of what is said here and on TOD and similar sites.

But after saying expanded energy use has caused "biodiversity loss and disturbance of the nitrogen cycle balance and other measure of sustainability of the earth's ecosystem" they seem to go on to say that the solution is MORE energy from cleaner sources, even though GW is the only one of these problems directly caused by energy from ff.

So they seem to want a huge technological fix that might mitigate GW but will still commit us to all the other kinds of devastation we have wreaked on the planet?

I have not yet read the whole report, so maybe there is deeper thought in there somewhere about these issues.
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Doomerish UN report

Unread postby AgentR11 » Thu 07 Jul 2011, 18:12:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'I') have not yet read the whole report, so maybe there is deeper thought in there somewhere about these issues.


Sometimes the answer is simple... "Yeah yeah, we admit it, we're screwed.. but in the meantime, I have a mortgage and a vacation to pay for, so you no stoppy my salary."
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Doomerish UN report

Unread postby Poordogabone » Thu 07 Jul 2011, 20:26:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ll those people in the developing world, if they’re to live healthier, less environmentally damaging lives the very last thing they need is hand-outs from richer economies.


This quote is wrong in so many ways, first of all the "developing world" has been subsidizing the lifestyle of western countries for the biggest part of the 20th century and continue to do so in the form of debt interests and raw materials, whenever I hear about hand-outs to the third world I have to laugh. Also the carbon footprint and resource usage of the average "westerner" is about 15/20 times more then the average person from the "developing world". You have 3 kids here in the US, you have the same impact and strain on earth environment as 60 kids in Bangladesh.
I'm all for population control but let's clean up house before pointing fingers.
Good for the UN for at least sounding some kind of alarm.
User avatar
Poordogabone
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Doomerish UN report

Unread postby Lore » Thu 07 Jul 2011, 20:39:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Poordogabone', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ll those people in the developing world, if they’re to live healthier, less environmentally damaging lives the very last thing they need is hand-outs from richer economies.


This quote is wrong in so many ways, first of all the "developing world" has been subsidizing the lifestyle of western countries for the biggest part of the 20th century and continue to do so in the form of debt interests and raw materials, whenever I hear about hand-outs to the third world I have to laugh. Also the carbon footprint and resource usage of the average "westerner" is about 15/20 times more then the average person from the "developing world". You have 3 kids here in the US, you have the same impact and strain on earth environment as 60 kids in Bangladesh.
I'm all for population control but let's clean up house before pointing fingers.
Good for the UN for at least sounding some kind of alarm.


Actually, it's the third world giving richer countries the handout by producing cheaper goods. Most people in developed nations suffer from the "tragedy of the commons".
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

Re: Doomerish UN report

Unread postby Pretorian » Thu 07 Jul 2011, 21:30:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Poordogabone', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ll those people in the developing world, if they’re to live healthier, less environmentally damaging lives the very last thing they need is hand-outs from richer economies.


This quote is wrong in so many ways, first of all the "developing world" has been subsidizing the lifestyle of western countries for the biggest part of the 20th century and continue to do so in the form of debt interests and raw materials, whenever I hear about hand-outs to the third world I have to laugh. Also the carbon footprint and resource usage of the average "westerner" is about 15/20 times more then the average person from the "developing world". You have 3 kids here in the US, you have the same impact and strain on earth environment as 60 kids in Bangladesh.
I'm all for population control but let's clean up house before pointing fingers.
Good for the UN for at least sounding some kind of alarm.


I do hope that you are snipped
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 05 May 2012, 03:47:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')S should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says United Nations

A United Nations investigator probing discrimination against Native Americans has called on the US government to return some of the land stolen from Indian tribes as a step toward combatting continuing and systemic racial discrimination.

James Anaya, the UN special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, said no member of the US Congress would meet him as he investigated the part played by the government in the considerable difficulties faced by Indian tribes.

Anaya said that in nearly two weeks of visiting Indian reservations, indigenous communities in Alaska and Hawaii, and Native Americans now living in cities, he encountered people who suffered a history of dispossession of their lands and resources, the breakdown of their societies and "numerous instances of outright brutality, all grounded on racial discrimination".

...

Last month, the US justice and interior departments announced a $1 billion settlement over nearly 56 million acres of Indian land held in trust by Washington but exploited by commercial interests for timber, farming, mining and other uses with little benefit to the tribes.

The attorney general, Eric Holder, said the settlement "fairly and honourably resolves historical grievances over the accounting and management of tribal trust funds, trust lands and other non-monetary trust resources that, for far too long, have been a source of conflict between Indian tribes and the United States."

But Anaya said that was only a step in the right direction.

"These are important steps but we're talking about mismanagement by the government of assets that were left to indigenous peoples," he said. "This money for the insults on top of the injury. It's not money for the initial problem itself, which is the taking of vast territories. This is very important and I think the administration should be commended for moving forward to settle these claims but there are these deeper issues that need to be addressed."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/04/us-stolen-land-indian-tribes-un


"Returning stolen lands" -- that ain't ever going to happen, we stole the land fair and square. :lol:

The reason no congressman would meet with the UN investigator is because, well, it's a UN investigator and the UN is politically toxic especially any hint of regulating things here in the US.

On the topic at hand..

Yes, more should be done for native Americans. Some has been done, not like we've never done anything. There's the Bureau of Indian Affairs. There are many Indian colleges. If you're native American your education is FREE. If you're black or white, it's not free and can cost up to $100,000. The problem here is intractable though, even colleges and free education it's still tough just as with Australia's aboriginals. Traditional people living traditional lives, it's hard to move them into the mainstream.

On Indian land, they can have casinos and that's actually a really good thing brings in a LOT of money and provides employment, funds cultural heritage preservation. Some tribes have branched out with new tourist ideas like the grand canyon skywalk.

Still it's a tough problem, but the US has a lot of tough problems -- the UN investigator has to remember there are lots of folks not being taken care of here, America's a tough place, no universal healthcare etc. etc. Benefits for all Americans are on the chopping block, even our elderly, regardless of race. So no, with so much sacrifice planned for everyone there won't ever be a huge dollar settlement for Indians or any land returned (you'd have to eminent domain confiscate private property for starters, compensate those landholders).

(another issue here is that these are really *poverty pockets* in general and that's not easy to solve.. we have lots of poverty pockets in the US, some black some white some Indian some latino. Poverty in eastern Kentucky is just as important as Indian poverty. It's all the same, generational pockets of poverty. Unfortunately MORE people are getting poor now, of all races.. don't know what more we can do for native Americans if we're not willing to do anything for anyone else either)
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby KingM » Sat 05 May 2012, 07:22:29

I'm sure the US will soon do just that, as will Canada and Australia. In other news, Russia will be moving out of eastern Poland, with Poland moving out of eastern Prussia to show their gratitude, Israel will be returning Palestine, China is giving up Tibet, and the Turks will shortly be moving back to central Asia so that the Greeks can reclaim their Byzantine possessions.
User avatar
KingM
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 732
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Second Vermont Republic

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby TreeFarmer » Sat 05 May 2012, 08:16:45

Who has to give up land and who gets the land? What about people like me who can trace their ancestors back to the early 1700's? I can point to at least one and maybe two American Indian ancestors so do I take land from myself and give it back to myself? Almost everyone who can trace their family history back to the 1700's here in the US had an indian ancestor.

This was nothing but busy-body UN claptrap. We should build the UN new offices free of charge, they would be on a giant submarine with screen doors so we could gather a bunch of those useless fuckers together in one place and drown them. Then repeat...

TF
User avatar
TreeFarmer
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby dissident » Sat 05 May 2012, 09:32:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KingM', 'I')'m sure the US will soon do just that, as will Canada and Australia. In other news, Russia will be moving out of eastern Poland, with Poland moving out of eastern Prussia to show their gratitude, Israel will be returning Palestine, China is giving up Tibet, and the Turks will shortly be moving back to central Asia so that the Greeks can reclaim their Byzantine possessions.


Russia has no overlap with historical Poland. Unless you mean the Grand Duchy of Lithuania which was some short lived local imperial entity that disappeared long ago. It is Ukraine and Belorus that overlap with former eastern Poland. And the Kaliningrad exclave sits on former Prussian soil.

The more pertinent case for comparison is Kosovo. The US claims that this "special" case deserves to be partitioned from Serbia because of a local Albanian majority. Using this logic every Indian reservation should have the automatic right to secede. Hell, I should get to secede my land because I am the 100% majority on it.
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sat 05 May 2012, 11:06:14

Image
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby dissident » Sat 05 May 2012, 11:32:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '[')img]http://northernblue.ca/common/FirstNationsTreaties.jpg[/img]


There is too much stylistic improvisation in this graphic. Aboriginal land claims in BC do not cover the exact territory of the province. It would be more useful to actually draw the treaty lands. There are unsettled treaty conflicts in Ontario too.

The bottom line is that the Dominion of Canada signed treaties with aboriginals and so did the USA. They must abide by them. One BC judge sneered at aboriginals in his court with: "imperial might makes right". There is a lot of "concern" in Canada and the USA about minority rights in Russia and China. In fact there is outright backing of secessionists. Meanwhile these self-anointed global do-gooders are telling aboriginals within their own borders to lump it. Simple, bloody hypocrisy.
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sat 05 May 2012, 11:42:53

I think it would be really cool to transfer most, if not all BLM land to the various Native American tribal groups and let them decide what to do with them; give'em a ten year exemption on taxes, and pretty much unconditional wavers for whatever they want to build.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Sat 05 May 2012, 12:04:59

My farm is on an Indian Reservation and the tribe (Nez Perce) are doing quite well thank you, Mr UN reporteur. They have the best school in the entire county. They've got the casino and a thriving tax-free smokes business. I've got several native neighbors; they're Catholic mostly, well behaved and friendly. They have their own Sheriff department that handles all Indian law enforcement. I don't think they need any extra-national help from some dang fureigners.
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby kpeavey » Sat 05 May 2012, 16:22:25

The UN needs to give its land back the the people of NY.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--for ever."
-George Orwell, 1984
_____

twenty centuries of stony sleep were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle, and what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
-George Yeats
User avatar
kpeavey
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1670
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby dohboi » Sat 05 May 2012, 17:14:46

US out of America!
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 05 May 2012, 17:37:38

We also stole Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada and California from Mexico.

Image
Does the UN think we should give those states back as well?
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sat 05 May 2012, 17:59:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dissident', 'M')eanwhile these self-anointed global do-gooders are telling aboriginals within their own borders to lump it. Simple, bloody hypocrisy.
These guys figure they ARE the aboriginals. God said so.
Image
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby dinopello » Sat 05 May 2012, 18:05:20

Yeah, nothing going to be given back to nobody. I think the best we can do is do a better job teaching what actually happened to the various peoples that were here when the white man came. I grew up near Jamestown, VA and we did several field trips where we viewed restored native dwellings with either actors or figurines making dinner in the thatched huts - basically a museum. But what we were taught, left us with the impression that the natives just kind of left voluntarily after welcoming the visitors with bountiful gifts of corn and turkey. Everyone was happy happy.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 05 May 2012, 19:01:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'B')ut what we were taught, left us with the impression that the natives just kind of left voluntarily after welcoming the visitors with bountiful gifts of corn and turkey. Everyone was happy happy.


Its only relatively recently that historians have figured out that the natives didn't leave---they mostly died in situ. Epidemics of European diseases ultimately killed off up to 80-90% of the natives.

Image
Sick native American with Medicine man
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Unread postby Loki » Sat 05 May 2012, 19:03:24

Nowhere in the article is it suggested that we give back all of the United States to the Indians. This is just knee jerk nonsense.

What this UN bureaucrat suggested is that the US government actually adhere to the promises it made in the hundreds of treaties with Indian nations (I know, radical stuff, huh?), specifically by restoring their original reservations, which make up a tiny fraction of US territory. Indirect reference was made to the Dawes Act, which severely fragmented many Indian reservations and led to a multi-billion dollar clusterfuck of epic mismanagement by the federal government.

And this land theft isn't exactly all ancient history. Here in Oregon several tribes were “terminated” in the 1950s and their reservations sold off to the highest bidders. Most of these tribes have been re-recognized (mostly in the 1980s and 90s) but they have little if any of their original reservations left. Google the Klamath Tribe.
A garden will make your rations go further.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron