by Sixstrings » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 11:41:27
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'W')hat's the libertarian position for dealing someone who is sick and dying because they couldn't get medical care earlier deciding they have nothing to lose and going on a murderous rampage killing a few rich doctors and patients, before killing him/herself?
Any kind of poverty uprising in general, Libertarians would be for a police / army crackdown. Libertarians believe national defense and security are proper roles for government.
So Ranger..
If you try to imagine what Libertarianism is, just roll the clock back to the 1890's-ish. Think Pinkerton private mercenary cops, to enforce the will of the rich because government would be weak so the rich would have their own armies and police forces for hire. Though government's national army would be small, it would still be quite effective against sick and hungry civilians -- if it's too much for the Pinkertons, then army gets called out.
That's Libertarianism. The poor riot, you crack down with force. If it gets bad enough though you wind up with a revolution -- Cuba, France, the Russian Romanovs. And this is why the US is not Libertarian today, because we are a democratic republic and step by step we progressed rather than the kettle ever blowing off into revolution.
Funny thing about Libertarians is they forget all the progress we made in the last century+ was for a reason, there were *problems* that were intolerable and voters demanded change.
Libertarian is just a fancy word for very weak government controlled by the rich, and the rich getting to do whatever they want.
EDIT: I just noticed Cog already answered this..
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'T')hey should be tracked down and shot like the dogs they are.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]The free shit army expects me to give of my abundance..