Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 30 Mar 2012, 19:00:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'I')f you hate Obama, that is your business----but please speak for yourself and don't ascribe your wacky views to me.

I think Obama is a great man and a historic figure....I just don't think the vast majority of his policies have worked out very well---and the Obamacare disaster is another example of Obama's policy failures.


I apologize for the cheap shot.

I just meant to say we're not talking abstract "theory" here, where the uninsured is always someone else and never anyone we know.

Pops has no insurance and can't get any. You said "we all have your back" or something like that, so what's that mean, you can help with cash or moral support? Best wishes and voting Republican won't help Pops and millions like him. If you're angry then I hit a nerve, my views aren't "wacky" this is fact -- you are going to vote for the party that is against universal healthcare, that means people like Pops will have to go without insurance.

You're probably mad because you're a nice guy and of course you'd like Pops to have insurance, but I connected the reasons why he doesn't and can't get insurance with the reality of the pols YOU vote for, so that's why you're angry.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 30 Mar 2012, 19:20:56

I am seeing Fish and Plant here as open republicans honestly looking at the issue. This is what's important. Healthcare reform should be a clearly bipartisan issue, with universal and balanced care the obvious objective.
No system is perfect, but it would be hard to imagine one worse for a society as a whole than the one the US has got. The fact that the current republican leadership is hell bent on killing off universal health care shows who they are really working for. What the hell that has to do with 'Government for the people', by the people' beats the hell out of me; just as the blindness of the folks in the lower 90% of the US likely to vote for these thugs.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby Beery1 » Fri 30 Mar 2012, 19:26:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'D')o people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?


All people deserve equal access to medical care. Anyone who suggests otherwise is scum.
"I'm gonna have to ask you boys to stop raping our doctor."
Beery1
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Tue 17 Jan 2012, 21:31:15

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 30 Mar 2012, 19:52:21

6's point on economic individual freedom is a biggie which gets almost no attention in the MSM or elsewhere. I first paid into medicare in Australia when I was a 12 year old picking pumpkins on the weekends to pay for my surfboards, rollerskates, motorbikes. I haven't a clue what I have put into the system and don't really care. It's a very small tax over a lifetime. Now in my mid forties I have never had anyone ask for help to pay for medications or hospitalization, in my family or friends or work colleagues. I have never seen an untreated medical beggar in the street.

I have never heard of anyone being bankrupted through a medical problem. I have never felt or seen anyone trapped in a job or on welfare because of such. These are major rewards in a society with a universal system all Americans should be keenly aware of and lobbying for.

From what I can see, Obamacare is a silly compromise with the big insurers and should never have been put forward as is. Screw the bastards. Scrap the whole system. Use the Australian system as a blueprint and go from there.

This dumb allergy to anything with the word 'Tax' attached is beyond ridiculous. All the 'scum' need to do is scream/ "It's a new tax and even bigger government" and the republican bones start rattling.
What is 1.5% compared to hundreds of dollars a month in insurance?
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby The Practician » Fri 30 Mar 2012, 21:34:27

I haven't filed a tax return or paid my MSP in like a decade. (read: never) I got a collection agency calling me 20 times a day trying to tell me I owe $4500 dollars in back payments for my MSP. They don't like it when I tell them I don't owe them sh*t because I have never made enough money to actually HAVE to pay for it, have never collected E.I., and have never collected a tax return.

The nice thing about Canada though: I show up at the hospital and I get the care, no matter how "irresponsible" (poor and disinterested) I am about my health insurance premiums.
The Practician
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2011, 22:08:02

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 30 Mar 2012, 22:35:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '
')From what I can see, Obamacare is a silly compromise with the big insurers and should never have been put forward as is. Screw the bastards. Scrap the whole system. Use the Australian system as a blueprint and go from there.


SeaGypsy is exactly right, as usual.

The crazy hodge podge of patches, changes, fudges, winks, taxes, subsidies, cuts, expansions, and phony economic numbers that comprised Obamacare was always unworkable and a total waste of time and it may turn out it was unconstitutional all along to boot.

We need a simple bare-bones universal single payer plan, like Canada, Australia, New Zealand and western Europe have. Put in a VAT and dedicate it to healthcare. Figure out how to lower healthcare costs---not make them higher as obamacare did. The sooner we get rid of the Obamacare follies the sooner we can move towards a more intelligent solution.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby Satori » Fri 30 Mar 2012, 23:52:44

the reality of healthcare in America
if your poor that is
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2012/03/d ... ution.html

and on a personal note
I was at the Urgent Care last week
I overheard a conversation
between the staff and an elderly woman
in short
if she didnt pay her back bill
she could no longer be seen
User avatar
Satori
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon 29 Oct 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 03:07:31

Over down under, she would have had a financial counselor work out with her and her family if she needed residential care. If she had no money, the kids could be millionaires but that would be irrelevant. If she owned a place worth well over a quarter mil, they may have pushed her to mortgage it against an 80% refundable (post mortum) rest home unit. If she had nada, a deal would be done where most of her aged pension would go to a nursing home to assist paying for her unit. That is usually unit, not bed. Her families assets don't even come into it. One way or another she would be looked after. The way it should be. Not thrown on the scrap heap.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby rangerone314 » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 09:49:05

What's the libertarian position for dealing someone who is sick and dying because they couldn't get medical care earlier deciding they have nothing to lose and going on a murderous rampage killing a few rich doctors and patients, before killing him/herself?

Just saying... because you know, sooner or later its going to happen.

(Oh, and the above scenario would include people who had health insurance and real conditions but were turned down by insurance companies counting on their dying before a lawsuit can go to court.)
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 10:01:10

A point goes to socialism.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby Cog » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 10:39:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'W')hat's the libertarian position for dealing someone who is sick and dying because they couldn't get medical care earlier deciding they have nothing to lose and going on a murderous rampage killing a few rich doctors and patients, before killing him/herself?
quote]

They should be tracked down and shot like the dogs they are. Murder is against the law. Just like the individual mandate is going to be found to be.

Judging by the masses of people loading up on booze, cheetos, smokes, and lottery tickets, a cleansing of people who make bad health and economic decisions is well deserved.

The free shit army expects me to give of my abundance but where do they ever make a sacrifice? I'm not seeing it when they flash their EBT card at the register and eat junk on my dime.
Last edited by Cog on Sat 31 Mar 2012, 11:01:13, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan
Top

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby rangerone314 » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 10:43:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'W')hat's the libertarian position for dealing someone who is sick and dying because they couldn't get medical care earlier deciding they have nothing to lose and going on a murderous rampage killing a few rich doctors and patients, before killing him/herself?
quote]

They should be tracked down and shot like the dogs they are. Murder is against the law. Just like the individual mandate is going to be found to be.

Judging by the masses of people loading up on booze, cheetos, smokes, and lottery tickets, a cleansing of people who make bad health and economic decisions is well deserved.

The free shit army expects me to give of my abudance but where do they ever make a sacrifice? I'm not seeing it when they flash their EBT card at the register and eat junk on my dime.

Murder is illegal, but other forms of killing you get rewarded! Gotta love homo sapiens and all the "exceptions".

Good idea, track them down. And how will you know what they are planning if they don't tell anyone, plant a computer chip in their brain or bug all sick uninsured people 24/7, maybe ban all guns--that's very libertarian!

How about tracking down the CEOs who have a policy of denying valid insurance claims from people with valid health insurance and killing them instead?

Or is the issue not libertarianism but favoring a few elite douchebags?

The individual mandate is illegal, just the like forcing people to buy auto insurance, registering for the Selective Service, or the draft dating back to Lincoln.

I want the free shit army to give me back my money that got spent pursuing WMD in Iraq and on $500 toilet seats. Ditto on farm and oil subsidies.

If we're going to be "libertarian", lets go ALL THE WAY, and not cherry pick.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby Cog » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 11:03:35

Self defense is not murder. You should really study more.

As far as the rest of your rant, save it for the libtards that frequent this board. I've heard all the justifications to last me a lifetime on confiscating my wealth to give to the mooch class.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby rangerone314 » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 11:20:38

I don't want to pay into "Social Security" because I'm not going to get anything back.

I tire of the hypocrisy of conartists and libtards and moneytarians. Big Business is as bad as Big Government.

Where is all the conservative outrage at BP and oil companies when an oil spill endangers small businessmen, or do small businessmen like shrimp fisherman not count? Maybe you consider shrimp fishermen or small scale farmers to be "libtards"?

Another classic, Michigan DNR being pushed by the big pig industry to go after small pig farmers.

Maybe the American people just need to refuse to consent to be governed anymore by Big Government and Big Business.

I'll support libertarianism when people can buy a small plot of land and choose to completely opt out of society entirely. In fact, I would probably do that if I was able to. Grow my own food with no stupid primates telling me what to do, and let everyone else have their taxes, their wars and their dying in a hospital with tube down their throats.

I like what the Dalai Lama said:
The Dalai Lama, when asked what surprised him most about humanity, answered “Man. Because he sacrifices his health in order to make money. Then he sacrifices money to recuperate his health. And then he is so anxious about the future that he does not enjoy the present; the result being that he does not live in the present or the future; he lives as if he is never going to die, and then dies having never really lived.”

I was stuck in traffic recently listening to some NCR program on the radio about some 3rd world kids living in filth and said "this can't be how human's were meant to live". Then I looked around at all the cars around me and said again "this can't be how human's were meant to live".
Last edited by rangerone314 on Sat 31 Mar 2012, 11:39:19, edited 6 times in total.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 11:22:14

Cog, you and I have both worked out some remote places and without getting into sensitive unrelated issues, I can fully relate to being nauseated by the level of sloth and bludgeing as we call it here. I'm not sure if you are aware, but among other legal changes in Australia recent years, everyone under retirement age is obliged to at least be assessed for work capacity regularly. It's not great but it is getting better here, with more active encouragement, more carrot than stick.

Bottom line is although I hate my tax going to pay for some fat piglady to stuff her delinquent fatherless brats full of garbage whilst enriching the local mafia with any spare, I sooner shut up and pay than have her runt kids scrambling over my fence with knives in their teeth and no food in their belly for three days. You get me?

There has to be limits on spending, but we are evolving as a species and in our systems. We should be very aware not to throw out the baby, nor to overlook what can be done when people are much more involved in their own personal care; preferably with money not being in the front nor center of the picture when it comes to life or death situations.

Where the society is clearly stuffed socially is where it is not safe for a grown up to tell off a child in public. Very bad. A 61 tear old near my home was stabbed in the gut for intervening in a teen argument at a train station yesterday. There is a dire shortage of proper respect, for elders, for common and private property. There is a lack of community responsibility and membership. If the Governments are any good anywhere these are issues which are seriously looked at and progressed towards solutions for. Not necessarily left or right in our western systems as both are basically centrist and bank serving.

Getting an Australian style med system in the USA would be a massive step forwards for the country. Whichever party has the simple intelligence to admit this and sell it will own government for at least double term.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 11:41:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'W')hat's the libertarian position for dealing someone who is sick and dying because they couldn't get medical care earlier deciding they have nothing to lose and going on a murderous rampage killing a few rich doctors and patients, before killing him/herself?


Any kind of poverty uprising in general, Libertarians would be for a police / army crackdown. Libertarians believe national defense and security are proper roles for government.

So Ranger..

If you try to imagine what Libertarianism is, just roll the clock back to the 1890's-ish. Think Pinkerton private mercenary cops, to enforce the will of the rich because government would be weak so the rich would have their own armies and police forces for hire. Though government's national army would be small, it would still be quite effective against sick and hungry civilians -- if it's too much for the Pinkertons, then army gets called out.

That's Libertarianism. The poor riot, you crack down with force. If it gets bad enough though you wind up with a revolution -- Cuba, France, the Russian Romanovs. And this is why the US is not Libertarian today, because we are a democratic republic and step by step we progressed rather than the kettle ever blowing off into revolution.

Funny thing about Libertarians is they forget all the progress we made in the last century+ was for a reason, there were *problems* that were intolerable and voters demanded change.

Libertarian is just a fancy word for very weak government controlled by the rich, and the rich getting to do whatever they want.

EDIT: I just noticed Cog already answered this..

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'T')hey should be tracked down and shot like the dogs they are.


Yup, that's the Libertarian response! :lol: The poor are rioting? Shoot them "like the dogs they are."

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]The free shit army expects me to give of my abundance..


Some people think all these overpaid government workers and government contractors are just a drain on the taxpayers, with their self-perpetuating bureaucratic bloat and pay / bennies that can't be found in the private sector where people have to really compete.

A "free shit army" is in the eye of the beholder. What about the rich with the tax loopholes their lobbyists get them, their tax havens, government subsidies -- isn't that a "free shit army?"
Last edited by Sixstrings on Sat 31 Mar 2012, 12:03:58, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 11:58:29

More polarization doesn't get the argument anywhere.
As far as I am concerned 'Libertarianism' is whatever I think it is, whatever anyone else thinks it is. You may think I am confused with Anarchy? Really putting capitals in front of ideologies which have not resulted in wars goes a bit beyond me.

How much more progress could the USA (let alone the rest of the world) have made had a few things been done differently? Why has the biggest, richest economy in the world got one of the worst social systems with many of the worst social statistics of developed countries?

The system clearly needs rebuilding. There needs to be more intervention by government where it is needed and a lot less where it is not. The sheer waste of many huge government programs, for really zero or less net gain, over stupid political out of date views, is plainly absurd. Get rid of the waste. Then 'Libertarians' might note complain so loudly about government.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby rangerone314 » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 12:05:23

I used to support the concept of libertarianism until I realized it was just a smokescreen used by elites to put blinders on people. (Run of the mill conservatism--or more accurately social conservatism--and liberalism are just divide and conquer strategies used by the elites)

I have yet to see libertarians acknowledge that the property rights of small landowners or small businessmen are as valid as the rights of a large landowner or large corporation.

Libertarianism is ultimately about providing protection for those exerting economic power; economic power ultimately translates in our society into political power. Its not about the little guy, whether or not the little guy is a drug-addicted leech on society living in a homeless shelter, or a small farmer who is working hard trying to raise crops.

I have yet to see their solution for market externalities, to see what the libertarian solution is for a factory pollution destroying a small farmer's crops. I also fail to see why advocating for the small farmer would be a "liberal" position given that the small farmer is working through his own sweat using his own land.

I also wonder how much of the cost of health care is due to pollution and the toxins in our bodies from products. Seems like another market externality.

Its why I'm trying to growing my own food, but I wonder what all I am forcibly exposed to against my will. Libertarians and Randists love to go off about their "non-aggression principle" but spewing toxins that make other people sick and making the other people choose between paying for their own healthcare and being sick seems pretty "aggressive" to me.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby Cog » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 12:14:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '
')That's Libertarianism. The poor riot, you crack down with force. If it gets bad enough though you wind up with a revolution -- Cuba, France, the Russian Romanovs. And this is why the US is not Libertarian Some people think all these overpaid government workers and government contractors are just a drain on the taxpayers, with their self-perpetuating bureaucratic bloat and pay / bennies that can't be found in the private sector where people have to really compete.

A "free shit army" is in the eye of the beholder. What about the rich with the tax loopholes their lobbyists get them, their tax havens, government subsidies -- isn't that a "free shit army?


You see Sixstrings, unlike you as a overpaid government employee, I, as a over-paid government contractor have done the math on what can be paid for and what can not. I can see the writing on the wall on when the gravy ends. But I'm doubtful that you have done the calculus on this for your government job. When the gravy ends for me and you, I can survive on 1/3 of my current pay, can you?

If I had the power, I would cut all federal government spending in half including the military. Fire most federal workers and eliminate entire departments that are pointless like Labor, EPA, Energy, Homeland Security, HUD, Veterans Affairs,
Agriculture, and Education. Turn those responsiblities back to the states.

I want the smallest federal government possible.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan
Top

Re: Do people who don't have insurance deserve medical care?

Unread postby rangerone314 » Sat 31 Mar 2012, 12:23:33

The smart money is on people who try now to grow their own food and live off the grid with solar power and are prepared to die of natural causes. I'd rather my money and the land and food resources I've built up be bequeathed to my children and grandchildren than pay for some doctor's Mercedes and new set of golf clubs.

I said it at the time to both my liberal wife and conservative parents that Obama care was ill-conceived (a single-payer system would be better) and ill-timed (should have been trying to encourage infrastructure during a recession instead of fiddling while Rome burns and worrying about healthcare).
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron