by jaws » Fri 27 May 2005, 18:46:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')Fannie and Freddie are govt grade but they're not govt. guaranteed, are they? If they are govt. guaranteed, then if there's a serious economic problem and the bonds default, you could lose your home AND have to bail out Freddie and Fannie through higher taxes or the crushing burden of trillions in govt. debt.
That's actually where the story gets really crazy. Greenspan has been making announcements for a few months that the government DOES NOT guarantee loans made to them, yet investors continue to purchase their bonds at rates under private-sector credit ratings.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')url]http://www.reuters.com/financeNewsArticle.jhtml?type=bondsNews&storyID=8544548[/url]
Greenspan said legislation that does not include portfolio limits will strengthen the market's perception that Washington would bail the companies out in a crisis.
That "implicit guarantee" allows Fannie and Freddie to borrow at much lower interest rates than its purely private-sector competitors. Greenspan said the companies exploit that subsidy to build their portfolios and generate profits for shareholders.
And one last thing, Fannie Mae came under scrutiny by the feds this year because of managers cooking the books about losses incurred in derivative trading in 2004.