by careinke » Wed 10 Aug 2011, 03:10:15
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('argyle', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('careinke', 'W')ith the net, UPS, FEDEX, etc. It is time to consider eliminating the post office. If it can't turn a profit, yet commercial companies can, why keep it around? Of course my Netflix subscription might go up.

If the mail is going to be privatized, I would at least want guarantees that the same service is offered by whomever is taking over.
It's all nice for companies to compete with the post office for the "cash cows" (mail from companies, advertisement, packages, etc), but not invest and maintain a minimum of service for all the regular ppl ,where ever they might be (in site, suburbs, sticks,..), for just a small number of letters/packages.. which is hardly profitable.
I strongly believe that government should not run, but at least own a majority of shares in companies that provide essential services (electricity, water, sewers, mail, telephone,..)
They could still be run as a private company (independent board, mgmt, etc) but if the main shareholder is the government, that government can/will have a say in things when the company is cutting too many services, focusing too much on profit. (a healthy company, but not a greedy company). If we valued ppl as much as we did profits, I'm pretty sure that a lot of jobs would now still be on US soil..
It seems to me it would be cheaper to provide people with internet access than postal service. Cheaper and more useful.