by copious.abundance » Tue 30 Aug 2011, 01:02:36
Posted January 1.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'H')ow would you create the necessary NG infrastructure for all regional transport, and not just urban areas currently supplied with dense NG supply lines? What is your solution to the costly energy overhead required to compress and recompress NG during fillups and for remote transport? It seems this is an unsurmountable problem ..
Well well well, lookee what we have here. One notable segment of pstarr's un[sic]surmountable problem is about to be resolved. CNG stations will soon be lining rural and remote stretches of Nevada, California, Utah and Arizona.
What a surprise! Pstarr says it's un[sic]surmountable and, lo and behold, it becomes surmountable!
LINKY$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://c1.gas2.org/files/2011/08/ictc_story.jpg[/img]
ICTC to Build Natural Gas Corridor from UT to CA to NVNo comments August 28, 2011
Source: Gas 2.0
A mainstream switch to non-petroleum fuels won’t be possible without the support of commercial fleets and over-the-road truck buyers, which account for a huge percentage of total miles driven. These truck fleets depend on a solid infrastructure in order to effectively schedule their job-critical operations, however, and (quite understandably) will hesitate to adopt any alternative fuels programs – despite the potential cost savings – until that “rock-solid” infrastructure is in place.
In a bid to address the issue, a group of alternative fuel activists is putting forward plans for what it calls “the Interstate Clean Transportation Corridor” (ICTC) which proposes a series of LNG and CNG filling stations connecting heavily trafficked interstate trucking routes between Utah, California, and Nevada.
[...]
which is enough to build 28 of these stations, plus some other stuff too.