Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Natural Gas Vehicles

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby peeker01 » Tue 16 Aug 2011, 13:35:56

Conservative estimates show enough natural gas, worldwide, to last your generation and that
of your children, and their children too. Planning beyond 3 generations is a waste of time.
peeker01
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri 24 Jun 2011, 18:19:54

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby peeker01 » Tue 16 Aug 2011, 14:18:44

The sky is falling.
peeker01
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri 24 Jun 2011, 18:19:54

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby peeker01 » Tue 16 Aug 2011, 17:48:56

This, plus a tank, (sold separately) is all you need to convert your car to natural gas.

http://shop.ebay.com/i.html?_from=R40&_ ... Categories
peeker01
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri 24 Jun 2011, 18:19:54

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby Lore » Tue 16 Aug 2011, 19:49:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peeker01', 'T')his, plus a tank, (sold separately) is all you need to convert your car to natural gas.

http://shop.ebay.com/i.html?_from=R40&_ ... Categories
Don't forget the compressor. Oh. And the high-volume gas feed. And the 220 volt power. And the permitting. Damn. Big gubmint hates our freedom :lol:


The immense cost of the infrastructure to service points will in itself make the economical roll out questionable.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby peeker01 » Tue 16 Aug 2011, 20:02:24

No, there are 10 commercial stations where I live. Not super convenient, but doable, especially
if you think crude is going away. That is what you think, right.......
peeker01
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri 24 Jun 2011, 18:19:54

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby copious.abundance » Tue 30 Aug 2011, 01:02:36

Posted January 1.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'H')ow would you create the necessary NG infrastructure for all regional transport, and not just urban areas currently supplied with dense NG supply lines? What is your solution to the costly energy overhead required to compress and recompress NG during fillups and for remote transport? It seems this is an unsurmountable problem ..

Well well well, lookee what we have here. One notable segment of pstarr's un[sic]surmountable problem is about to be resolved. CNG stations will soon be lining rural and remote stretches of Nevada, California, Utah and Arizona.

What a surprise! Pstarr says it's un[sic]surmountable and, lo and behold, it becomes surmountable! 8O :shock:

LINKY
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://c1.gas2.org/files/2011/08/ictc_story.jpg[/img]

ICTC to Build Natural Gas Corridor from UT to CA to NV
No comments August 28, 2011
Source: Gas 2.0

A mainstream switch to non-petroleum fuels won’t be possible without the support of commercial fleets and over-the-road truck buyers, which account for a huge percentage of total miles driven. These truck fleets depend on a solid infrastructure in order to effectively schedule their job-critical operations, however, and (quite understandably) will hesitate to adopt any alternative fuels programs – despite the potential cost savings – until that “rock-solid” infrastructure is in place.

In a bid to address the issue, a group of alternative fuel activists is putting forward plans for what it calls “the Interstate Clean Transportation Corridor” (ICTC) which proposes a series of LNG and CNG filling stations connecting heavily trafficked interstate trucking routes between Utah, California, and Nevada.

[...]

And yes, they've already secured $63 million which is enough to build 28 of these stations, plus some other stuff too.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby copious.abundance » Tue 30 Aug 2011, 01:07:46

And just a bump from a couple years ago, here's some pics of a CNG station I took near me. Notice how technologically complex it is, obviously it's prohibitively expensive (which, after all, is why it was built!), and in fact it's such an ordeal to build the things only the folks in Pakistan have the technology, money and know-how to construct the things on a large scale!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'B')TW, I recently took a little trip to the local CNG station near me in Everett, Washington to take some pics. This is right off I-5. Handy and convenient to loads of suburban areas.

Overview
Image

Instructions on how to use the pump
Image

You get your choice of 3000 psi . . .
Image

. . . or 3600 psi
Image

They even take Visa, MasterCard and Discover! 8O
Image

Close-up of an actual pump thingy. Pretty simple-looking device.
Image

Behind the pumping area was a concrete enclosure which contained some mechanicals. This was next to the enclosure. I went up and read the label on this thing but I forget what it said it was.
Image

Peeking through one side of the concrete enclosure. Dunno what this was.
Image

And peeking through the other side of the enclosure, I think these were the tanks holding the natural gas.
Image
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby JRP3 » Tue 30 Aug 2011, 18:16:11

What a great idea, lets wastefully use another limited fossil fuel resource by burning it in inefficient ICE vehicles instead of more efficiently using it to generate electricity to charge EV's, and let's spend a whole crapload of money to do so. Cool beans, we have a lot of NG to waste anyway. Oh wait, maybe not:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/25/us/25gas.html
User avatar
JRP3
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon 23 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby homeboy » Tue 30 Aug 2011, 18:45:34

It's widely known the electric grid cannot support a large fleet of ev's . If gasoline becomes unaffordable, large amounts of capital will need to be spent on infastructure, be it electric
or NG.
homeboy
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2011, 13:08:31

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby JRP3 » Tue 30 Aug 2011, 23:12:47

Widely known by who? People who don't know the capacity of the grid?
http://energyenvironment.pnnl.gov/ei/pdf/Impact%20Assessment%20of%20PHEV%20on%20US%20Power%20Grid.pdf
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he total electric energy
requirement for the entire electric vehicle fleet was
relatively modest compared to the total electricity
production for non-transportation users.


http://www.pnl.gov/news/release.aspx?id=204
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f all the cars and light trucks in the nation switched from oil to electrons, idle capacity in the existing electric power system could generate most of the electricity consumed by plug-in hybrid electric vehicles.
Blogging about EV's
http://ephase.blogspot.com/

Building the AMPhibian
http://amp-phibian.blogspot.com/

http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums/
User avatar
JRP3
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon 23 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby copious.abundance » Tue 30 Aug 2011, 23:52:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JRP3', 'W')hat a great idea, lets wastefully use another limited fossil fuel resource by burning it in inefficient ICE vehicles instead of more efficiently using it to generate electricity to charge EV's, and let's spend a whole crapload of money to do so. Cool beans, we have a lot of NG to waste anyway. Oh wait, maybe not:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/25/us/25gas.html

Ermm, if you want to compare apples-to-apples (that is, USGS to USGS), that study represents an increase from 2 trillion cubic feet in the USGS's 2002 study to 84 trillion cubic feet this year. That's a 4,100% increase. The EIA uses a totally different method for calculating their figures so the two aren't really comparable.

And it's not like 84 trillion cubic feet is a small amount. And it's not like the Marcellus shale is the only shale gas in the US. :roll:

I actually did read somewhere recently that it's more efficient to burn the natgas to produce electricity and then use that to power electric cars, than it is to power cars directly with natgas. If true - or even partially true - my response is: May the best man win.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby homeboy » Wed 31 Aug 2011, 00:05:40

Hey Roc, let these guys walk while we are styling in out pimped out NG rides!
homeboy
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2011, 13:08:31

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby JRP3 » Wed 31 Aug 2011, 00:26:10

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/us/26gas.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n the e-mails, energy executives, industry lawyers, state geologists and market analysts voice skepticism about lofty forecasts and question whether companies are intentionally, and even illegally, overstating the productivity of their wells and the size of their reserves.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', '
')
I actually did read somewhere recently that it's more efficient to burn the natgas to produce electricity and then use that to power electric cars, than it is to power cars directly with natgas. If true - or even partially true - my response is: May the best man win.

It seems to hold true for most fuel sources.
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22628/
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') study published today in Science concludes that, on average, using biomass to produce electricity is 80 percent more efficient than transforming the biomass into biofuel.

The ICE is so damned inefficient, especially when you consider the whole distribution chain, but even just the conversion of fuel to motion in an ICE is terrible at about 15-20%. NG in a combined cycle generating plant can be 60% efficient, throw in 7% transmission loss, 10% charging loss, if that, and 90% EV motor and controller efficiency, and you're about twice as efficient as a CNG ICE. Throw in the pumping losses to distribute and compress NG for use in an ICE and the difference increases even more.
Blogging about EV's
http://ephase.blogspot.com/

Building the AMPhibian
http://amp-phibian.blogspot.com/

http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums/
User avatar
JRP3
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon 23 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby Christina12 » Sat 24 Dec 2011, 00:32:27

Natural gas can be used in all classes of vehicles - motorcycles, cars, vans, trucks, buses, lift trucks, locomotives, even ships and ferries. Natural gas can be used either by converting an existing gasoline or diesel engine, or by using a purpose built natural gas engine.

Benefits of natural gas vehicles include:

Reduced particulate and NOx (Nitrogen Oxides) emissions
Reduced greenhouse gas emissions
Widespread availability of natural gas
Lower cost
Can be derived from renewable sources (biogas)
Technically proven
Available now
Can be used in all vehicle classes
Minimal processing or refining requirements
Safer than most liquid fuels
Can be refueled at home or workplace
Noise reductions of as much as 50%
Reduced engine wear
and more...

With these benefits, its easy to see why natural gas vehicle (NGV) numbers have more than doubled in the last 5 years alone. There are currently more than 12 million NGVs worldwide (October 2010) and NGV Global (IANGV) is projecting that this will increase at least ten-fold, to 50 million vehicles by 2020.
Christina12
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue 20 Dec 2011, 02:58:10

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby KingM » Sat 24 Dec 2011, 08:48:32

Why do so many of these "rah rah" posts come from people who have 1-5 total posts. It makes them sound like astroturfers.
User avatar
KingM
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 732
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Second Vermont Republic

Re: Natural Gas Vehicles

Unread postby JRP3 » Tue 27 Dec 2011, 12:00:47

Indeed. That post sounds like an NG industry PR piece. The energy wasted in compressing, piping, and compressing further to fill a tank would propel an EV for many miles. A home fill station uses over 6kwh's to pump 100 miles of range onto a CNG vehicle tank, which doesn't include the energy used at the main distribution station in the first place.
http://www.foxservice.com/austin/knowledge_base.asp?ID=1291222063727&_perPg=30&view=articles&_category=Compressed%20Natural%20Gas&_filterField=Categories
User avatar
JRP3
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon 23 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron