by JRP3 » Sun 04 Mar 2012, 12:39:04
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', ' ')
Hi Solar:
Amazingly, you completely missed the point of the data, the DOE paper I linked to, and the topic of this whole thread. None of this has anything to do with the efficiency of a "typical single-passenger gasoline car" you are talking about.
This topic is about natural gas cars. The reason that the DOE report I linked to contains effciency numbers higher than those for typical gasoline cars in modified engines is because CNG cars are more efficient than typical ICE gasoline cars after the engine is modified to optimize the use of natural gas. The octane content of NG is much higher than the octane of gasoline making the whole engine much more efficient.
If you don't know about CNG vehicles, I suggest you check it out---AGAIN, if you want to talk about "typical gasoline cars" you are in the wrong thread---this is a discussion vehicles fueled by NATURAL GAS.
Yes, and the links I previously provided show the Honda CNG vehicle getting between 26-32mpg in actual use, mildly efficient for an ICE, and no where near the numbers you are claiming.
If you don't know about CNG vehicles, I suggest you check it out.