by Timo » Fri 05 Aug 2011, 10:22:45
Bear with me here as i think out loud. My apologies if this ends up making no sense. First, what's the historical time frame of the 1st World-3rd World concepts? When did they first become relevant terms in the context of global standards of living and economic function? My guess is sometime post WWI, but that's only a guess. If that is true, though, then this means that only during the 1st part of the 20th Century did the functional economic systems of all of the various parts of the world start to seperate into distinct levels. Some nations prospered, while others stayed level. This global seperation of standards/prosperity continued, and is still continuing to spread. I doubt that any nation still performs under a 19th Century economic system, but very clearly, 1st World countries are vastly different from 3rd World countries. This understanding means that the seperation of human conditions, relative to all of human history, is a very recent phenomena, and was enabled only through the exploitation of the physical means of that seperation, ie., the industrial revolution, or put more simply, fossil fuels. !st World economies are based entirely on the endless continuation of cheap and available fossil fuels to fuel the means of their industries. I would argue that the actual production of what made 1st World economies explode with wealth has been transfered to 3rd World economies, and they are gradually catching up. Meanwhile, 1st World economies have shifted their systems of economic wealth from actual production of goods to the production of services. Now, along comes technology that enables the provision of services down to the individual level (iPads, smart phones, androids, etc...) meaning that actual people are no longer required to participate in this aspect of economic function, meaning that a) people lose their jobs, and b) people lose any relavant skills to do much of anything productive. Again, meanwhile 3rd World economies are going gang busters making crap that the rest of the world wants, but are increasingly unable to afford, even though it's all dirt cheap. The gadgets that everyone assumes is essential for life actually has little or no value in a true, functional sense of living. We're all alive at this pivotal point in human history when we all slowly, or quickly, begin the convergence again of economic functions across the globe. Our understandings of 1st World and 3rd World were temporary glitches in the course of human history. We all have only one planet, and it exists to serve all of life equally. Those of us who have prospered did so at great expense, but now reality has simply raised her hand and said Sorry. That's all i got. This leveling of the playing field began in earnest with the North American Free Trade Agreement that allowed goods to be produced elsewhere and to be shipped and sold around the continent. Naturally, corporations realized that the same goods could be produced in 3rd world economies cheaper than in 1st world economies, and so the jobs went there. The argument was that this lowered the price of those goods, thus enabling the rest of us to spend less money. They rise in wealth. We fall in wealth. It's all leveling out. I believe there was a gentleman with the name of Marx who described this scenario repeating itself through history, pitting the proletariat against the bourgoisie. They fight, come to a new level playing field, gradually separate into the two catagories again, fight, even themselves out, gradually separate, etc.......... His observations, however, were only applied to individual economies or regions of the larger playing field (earth). Now, with a global economy, this distinction between 1st world and 3rd world serves the same theory, only on a much, much larger scale. Overall, though, i would venture that these series of battles throughout human history have always resulted in an upward shift in the human condition. Some rise, some fall, but collectively, there's an uptick. Time will tell if this "correction" or "collapse" or "endgame" will be any different.
Again, my apologies if this all made no sense.