by Outcast_Searcher » Mon 25 Jul 2011, 07:09:04
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('prajeshbhat', 'T')here are 14.1 million unemployed in USA. If they are given $400 per week, that would cost $ 5.64 billion. If the $ 16 trillion that was given to these too-big-to-fail was instead given to the unemployed, they can be supported for 2836 weeks. That's 54 years !!!!!
According to the treasury and their talking heads appointed by Obama, the U.S. got these investments back, and even ended up profitable on them, at least for the banks. (Car companies, Freddy, Fannie are still "works in progress"). Are you saying they are lying, or are you conveniently ignoring ALL the money paid back to make score some sort of distorted liberal point?
Money spent on things like basic research, NASA, etc. generally is at least partially productive (if not extremely productive) in that it yields new technologies that improve the economy over time.
Sadly, war does the same thing. Learning how to blow people and property up yields other technology to build better stuff (so it can be blown up in a later war, I guess). Both political parties seem inclined to start and continue wars.
We're bankrupt. Except for a disincentive to work, more debt, a worse economy, a moral hazard, and supposedly preventing the revolution that the far left loves to tout, what is it that pouring (using your figures) well over $5 billion a week endlessly into unemployment gets us? (Shorter term fine -- but there needs to be SOME endpoint, perhaps preceded by a declining payout).
Your argument is one sided at best.
Supposedly your buddies on the left, Barney Frank et al have FIXED the too big to fail problem. So next time they will just "resolve" the problem in a way that won't mess up the system. Congratulations, problem solved.

On the other hand, from what I read, so many regulators are now writing hundreds of complex new financial rules to crank up the Dodd/Frank financial legislation that there aren't enough to actually REGULATE the financial industry. And every dollar you spend on (for example) unemployment checks and "free" medicial care is a dollar that can't be spent on EFFECTIVE financial regulation, to prevent the banks from failing NEXT time.
Money doesn't grow on trees. You have to prioritize these things.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.