by vision-master » Tue 19 Jul 2011, 20:01:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'P')roblem with this generally silly term "mooch" is that its meaningless, yet mean.
There is level of infrastructure and integration that the government is involved in; we use scribbles on paper that are worth nothing outside of the value assigned to it by government (directly or indirectly); to engage in any sort of commerce we move things by land or sea, and can do so as a result of government action on our behalf. So there's no avoiding, in a normal life, some things which are the product of government spending the wealth of its people on their behalf for their common use.
At the other end, are social contract things paid by the people to others who will not or can not work for their own, or produce enough value to feed themselves. I think we mostly all agree, that the 60 IQ fellow, with a gimpy leg and not great eyesight is less expensive to us all if we can find a way for him to avoid starvation, and live in some type of shelter operating within the normal economic system. If you force him to crime to avoid starvation, someone will get hurt, or die, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in recovery costs, as well as more hundreds of thousands in the process of punishing the guy, who likely doesn't even realize he's being punished.
Ok, so there are valid social contract expenditures of government. Where do we draw the line of valid expenditures? That's the question that has to be confronted, but that everyone is afraid to confront, because it involves saying "NO" to some people, and perhaps to people who have only heard "YES" up until now. There is no way to make those decisions not suck.
My personal take on the thing is for anyone able to work that is drawing government assistance, they need to be doing so in the form of a government work program, where in all cases, any paying civilian job, of any type, would be a drastic improvement in dollars vs effort calculation. I don't even care if its carrying half pound rocks back and forth on a football field. For an able bodied person, no labor = no money. Better if you get some social good out of the labor, of course. And that takes you to disability. YUCK! See how this gets out of control, and impossible to fix well? And what about the elderly, to old to safely walk back and forth on the football field? So we are where we are.
We are unwilling to say no, and we are unable to keep paying as we are. In the end, we've decided by default, to let mathematics say NO. As Ron Paul put it; you'll get your SS check, your Medicaid, your bond payment, but you'll be lucky to be able to afford a loaf of bread with it.
Sad thing is, math is a much more cruel answer, than if we took it upon ourselves to say "no" to those who can survive having someone say "no" to them.
Do you lack love?
The path to
Love Worry for others
Pray for everyone
Listen to those who YOU have cast away
Forgive your transgressors
Work towards a brighter future
vm