by AgentR11 » Thu 21 Jul 2011, 12:21:23
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'S')imply because most 21st Century Rich Worlders have had the luxury of ignoring government doesn't mean we're immune to government oppression or government complicity in de facto control by the 1%. I don't know if irreversible energy decline begins next week or next decade but our current course of willfully transferring wealth and power upwards - to punish the Moochers - is creating a plutocracy that will be the downfall of democracy.
I think you're obsessing about the 1%; and not seeing the top 25% as the full group. Sure the 1% are running the show; but its being run differently than in prior iterations of the creation of a nobility class. The weakness in prior iterations was that it was too small to protect itself from a popular uprising of starving peasants. However, this iteration, the top 1% is dragging a full 15-25% of the population up with them, whether as a force buffer, or a social system, its hard to say, as no one person is deciding the why's and how's. On the other end, the "moochers" as defined by the thread initiator, have food stamps and subsidized slum housing that removes the "starving" from the "peasant"; thus making the uprising unsustainable as no one is angry for long enough for the whole mass of the bottom half to revolt.
In the past, they thought that keeping the peasant afraid and starving improved their control; but it doesn't. Keeping the peasant at the edge of contentedness does. A peasant who's children go to sleep peacefully after having eaten a drab but substantial dinner, remains content; or at least only gets slightly riled at the pub and has some fist fights for fun and sport.
Even at the breakpoint of your chart, at the 25% mark, where no improvement (but no loss) in income has occurred, does not that family begin to feel more and more privileged as the lower 75% falls away, just in comparison. Everyone else around them is having a harder time making ends meet, but they still go to the store and buy whatever suits their fancy at the moment....
In short, I think seeing this in terms of the evil 1% very much misses the picture of what is going on.
With the 25% stake holders, you only need to bag, mislead, or pander to a some small slices of the peasant community in order to maintain control while also preserving the illusion of democracy; as long as they are split voting D or R, it all works out fine for the 25%. However, don't make the mistake of thinking the 25% are all Reps, a good portion are Dems, Wall Street being largely Dem-wealthy for instance; the point is to make sure the lower 75% don't block vote one or the other, because then they will control that party, and muck up the works. As long as the 75% is solidly split, the system will work to concentrate the power of the 1% allowing them to separate themselves, and their associated social environment (2%-25%), from the moochers.