by Ibon » Sat 28 Aug 2010, 14:28:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', '
')
Well..okay....you mean...like its worked okay so far so lets keep doing it?
I think the technological trajectory started from the first stone tool and will develop for as long as we remain a species on the planet. That part is what Ludi said makes us essentially human. So technology will never go away and we will just keep using it. The hubris, however unintended and unconscious in the beginnig, started when technology advanced to the point that we altered natural landscapes. Innocuous and well within carrying capacity early on it eventually led to the overshoot we experience today. One can argue whether it started with agriculture or when we set fire to grasslands but in any event technology led us to civilization which at some point in our cultural evolution caused a major cultural shift to happen in our heads......that we can manipulate and control, optimize, dominate and even replace natural ecosystems. In the beginning when we planted corn or wheat seeds we weren't consciously doing this it just was a consequence. At some point however we became conscious of our ability to dominate and control.
It is at this point that these discussions often drift into a debate about whether civilization was a mistake and inherently unsustainable and that our hunter gatherer tribal ancestors had it right and that we need to go back to this model since it is the only proven sustainable culture humans ever produced etc. etc . I have argued in the past that what happened happened and that you can't put humpty dumpty back together again so culturally the moment humans ate the apple of civilization and became sentient of their ability to dominate that this fall from hunter gatherer grace will now remain a part of our culture going forward even if we collapse back down to tribal cultures. For even then the ghosts of our ruins will stir the imagination of some clever future tribal idiot and we'll start the dominance game up all over again.
This all by default only leaves us one pathway out of extinction. To spiritually embrace the ideology espoused on my previous post. Applying our technology toward stewardship.
That still leaves a lot of room for technological innovation and a balanced ability to submit and yet direct our destiny simultaneously. Granted it may seem unimaginable with our current confused culture but don't forget those teachers and guide posts I mentioned. They are worse than nuns with rulers and are getting ready to slap you for your sins. Call them Gaia nuns.....
How many of us can recognize the collective spiritual yearning toward submission to the greater good of mother earth that is currently in the form of cultural embryos waiting to rise out of the ashes of our currently doomed cultural paradigm?
Xenophobe Wrote$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
') So the balanced brotherhood and veiled religious references weren't just another version of some born again Christians desire to impose their perspective on others? I mean seriously, it ventured awful close to a "peace, love dope" angle.
Ask yourself a moment who will do the imposing? Or better yet where the imposition will come from?