by Pixie » Tue 11 Dec 2007, 20:31:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '
')
So you don't believe that somebody who is spending a lot of money on gas every month might get tempted by a scooter? You know, they see an ad, or hear about it from a friend, that these mopeds get 100 miles/gallon, versus their current 20mpg. And they go home and work it out. It turns out that they can actually save about $US 4.50 an hour by driving a moped. It's like working a second job, where you earn an extra $4.50 for every hour you drive. Would you drive a moped for a tax-free $4.50 an hour? I would. If I was a low wage guy in America right now with gas at $3.50, I could definitely be tempted by a nice moped. Especially with a good ad campaign that played up the money angle. A hot moped like this:
You don't think that a certain percentage of people might give in and purchase a scooter, without being forced but by being tempted, by the money?
There is always a market for mopeds. There is always a market for bicycles. There is always a market for small cars and train tickets. The question is when the market forces shift on a macro level and the majority of people start going that way and away from SUV's. Also, once people do that, how does it affect life? Is that still Life As We Know It?
And later, when the price goes even higher, and even the mopeds are not practical, is that Life as We Know It?
And then when do we get to the point when the price of petrochemicals has gotten to the point that farmers won't buy fertilizer--can they all switch to organic in time? Can they all switch to organic at all?
And when the entire corn crop gets sold for ethanol, and none for food, is that Life as We Know It?