by Sixstrings » Fri 17 Jul 2015, 11:24:55
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Withnail', 'I')'m interested in American issues because Britain is a puppet state of America.
Obviously subject peoples are, indeed have to be, interested in what goes on in the imperialist state.
Well.. it's all up to the UK, whatever role they want to have in world affairs. US and UK were close all through the cold war and then the Bush years. Reagan and Thatcher, Blair and Bush. The US tacks neutral / encourages settlement regarding Argentina and the UK (still to this day) and really I don't think that's right. But the US interest is just not having problems in south america.
But neither was Thatcher pressured too much, nor stopped, when she chose to retake the Falklands.
Will a future British prime minister just give the islands up? That's in your hands.
This is all geopolitics. The value of a "special relationship" and being a strong ally is that gives a lot of diplomatic currency that can be expended to then BUCK american policy, when and if Britain needs to do that for its own interests. Like the Falklands. Like joining China Bank.
Foreign relations is like any other human relationship, there's a running tally of "how much have you crossed me, versus how much have you been there for me."
It's to the UK's benefit to be the #1 ally in europe. Just culturally, it's a good fit obviously, and the UK is trusted more than other nations.
This article says there's going to be more integration between the royal navy and US navy, and sharing of military schools and some training, and that Brits are "the only foreigners trusted to have the Super Hornet" and if I'm reading it right I guess British carriers will have F-35b's too:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ritain’s Top Admiral: U.S., U.K Planning For ‘Closer and Stronger’ Naval Alliance
Now the senior service is embarking on a fresh maritime renaissance that will see it deliver enhanced capabilities in partnership with its most enduring ally. That, at least, was the message delivered by the Royal Navy’s First Sea Lord Adm. George Zambellas and his American counterpart at a joint seminar in London on Wednesday.
“There are few areas where our strategic interests are more natural, or our global interests are more aligned, than at sea,” Zambellas told an audience at the Royal Institute of International Affairs — also known as Chatham House.
Zambellas said the 75-year-old partnership, which dates to the Battle of the Atlantic in World War II, is about to become “even closer and stronger” thanks to a combination of sustained investment in ships and equipment and on the “direct practical [and] spiritual support we’ve had from the US Navy.”
...
In December 2014, Zambellas and the U.S. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert signed a Combined Sea Power agreement—a shared vision for naval cooperation for the coming 15 years.
The accord addresses five key areas:
The close co-ordination of carrier strike operations, with the new Queen Elizabeth-class carriers (including F-35B strike fighters, helicopters and unmanned air systems) reinforcing the capability provided by the U.S. Navy.
The integration of U.K. and U.S. ships in one another’s maritime task groups, a process that should become “intuitive.”
Additional personnel exchanges, particularly in headquarters and niche roles where it is important to preserve perishable skills.
Mutual investment in technologies that permit interoperability, including weapons, sensor systems, data processing and protocols, and autonomous vehicles.
Force and capability planning “to ensure that together we maintain a balanced mix of capabilities and that our activities complement our mutual priorities.”
Zambellas said: “Together or individually we must be ready to project power and respond to crises around the world quickly, flexibly and credibly. For the next 15 years and more, we are designing and deploying naval forces to be more than interoperable. From the outset we aim to be integrated, working in unison, not in tandem.”
Greenert told the seminar: “We depend on the Royal Navy, very much so, from tactics, to operations to strategy. From world wars, through the Cold War to today, we have always been stalwart allies. Today we enjoy a closeness and an unconditional trust that is really unequalled anywhere around the world. From a schoolhouse, to an exercise, to a deployment, to a real world combat operation, Royal Navy members are embedded throughout our ranks.”
The CNO pointed out that already British pilots were the only foreigners permitted to fly Super Hornets on strike missions. “No other pilot can even sit in a Hornet, because they can’t get the clearance. Of all the allied training that we have, we can only trust the [RN-run] Perisher course . . . to qualify our nuclear submarine commanders.”
http://news.usni.org/2015/07/16/britains-top-admiral-u-s-u-k-planning-for-closer-and-stronger-naval-alliance Oh, look at this Withnail, I guess Britain's gonna get the super way cool American RAIL GUNS. Now that's worth it, no? What nation wouldn't want these rail guns. That's THE munition of the future. Your leadership is smart, who else could the UK ally with and get advanced tech like that:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e also disclosed that British exchange officers were working on the U.S. electromagnetic railgun program.