Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I'm extra smart. Shouldn't I pass on my genes?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Postby linlithgowoil » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 12:23:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m not so sure about that. Marine training, for example, rubs out the old personality and imposes a new one. I think the software has as much to do with behaviour as the hardware.

Of course I'm a software engineer, so my second-natural mode of thought predisposes me to think so.


I saw a programme that said the army finds it very hard to get soldiers to actually have that killer instinct. your average conscript doesnt have it usually - most people would do anything to avoid killing another person. however, people who voluntarily join the army are a different story. many of these people have the killer instinct already and possibly enjoy killing people. this is all genetic.
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland

Postby threadbear » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 13:10:39

We should limit our reproduction with birth control. What part of that is difficult to understand and what part of it is inhumane?

The first thing women do when given a choice, in any part of the world, if they have access to birth control, is to take it.

What really gets on my nerves is dragging euthanasia, abortion, etc..etc.. into it. These are side issues. Distractions. It would be absolutely fine with me if every woman had her tubes tied after her first child. Finito bambino.

If the world became a living hell and govts. mandated this, I'd cheer.

It's the very height of narcissism for irresponsible breeders to think that their (pick one)(a) great intelligence (b) beauty (c) the power of their love, can override a mathematical reality. Too many people

I also take GREAT exception to the idea that all suffering is meaningful. Not so. We feel this in our hearts. When sadness is touched with softness, when grief carries with it a shard of light, that's meaningful.

Other forms of suffering are akin to placing one's hand on the hot element of a stove, designed to incite change--and quickly.

Linlith, If you want to place your hands and those of your future children on the hot element of life in a peak old world, go ahead. But understand, not only are your many children going to suffer a terrrible animal existence, you and your entire family will suffer the wrath of your non Catholic neighbours.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Falconoffury » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 14:00:54

Lin, a lot of the stuff you say, you pass as fact, when it is really opinion.

When it comes to euthanasia, I think at the very least the people who ask to die be allowed to die. And then, there are some people who are in so much pain and have no hope of survival who should also be put down. Mentaly or physically retarded people can live some quality of life in many cases. Some diseases like muscular dystrophy can still allow victims to live some quality of life. It's just the people who really have no hope who should be put down.

I've seen military situations in TV shows and movies where a soldier gets badly wounded and won't last long, and his comrades sometimes give him an overdose of painkillers to put him out of his misery. This looks like an act of mercy to me.

Lin, perhaps if you shared my opinion that our population will go down below 1 billion people, then your views would change, but I think that's the only way they would change.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Postby k_semler » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 15:11:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', '
')The trouble with your vision of the future is that it would cause enormous misery amongst people. I fail to see how having a society where you are only valued if you are able bodied and not a burden on society would be good. You'd have people murdering their parents because they couldnt be bothered looking after them etc.

And, again, you'd only be able to have such a society by ruling it with an iron fist and exterminating any opposition. You really think that would be a nice society to live in? - Secret police smashing down doors, removing babies who werent supposed to be born and murdering them?


That was already tried. See WWII, specifically Nazi Germany. Also see 70 years of the USSR, and the red march of Chairman Mao. See the DPRK. Look at Pol-Pot, and Ho Chi Mihn.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Postby Liamj » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 00:07:01

Great stuff, fascinating.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raxozanne', '
')There was a UK doctor on the lunchtime news that said he knew of cases in the UK where people had called up some helpline complaining that hospitals were denying their terminally ill (very ill) relatives food or water even when they were screaming out for them

I don't think that is right. People should not be denyed food/water if they are asking for some even if they will die soon.

I agree, thats horrific.
And thats what we've got now, and are booked to get more of: systematic failure to meet politically set objectives. Humanist policy sez keep everybody alive as long as possible, but economic rationalist policy sez cut the margins to the bone and then some.

Meanwhile a culture that tells itself it values all, shuts away or abandons the old, the sick, the young, the mad, the disabled and the criminal. 'Hypocrisy' doesn't cover it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')We should limit our reproduction with birth control. What part of that is difficult to understand and what part of it is inhumane?
Absolutely.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')...

What really gets on my nerves is dragging euthanasia, abortion, etc..etc.. into it. These are side issues. Distractions. It would be absolutely fine with me if every woman had her tubes tied after her first child. Finito bambino.

If the world became a living hell and govts. mandated this, I'd cheer.
If the world became a living hell and people chose this, I'd streak the CBD. I think culture must and could prove maleable/amenable to 1 child, else its die off for sure. Maybe hard to imagine for us, programmed/raised/educated in 'growth forever' culture, but the next generation is going to have a whole different set of lessons.
Making as many of us, and hopefully thus as many of them aware of the options & consequences as possible, that seems worth doing.

Disagree that euthanasia is a distraction, would agree its secondary, or of lesser immediate importance than birth control. But i think its got potential, despite constant fearmongering that any euthanasia means random murder. Does having any firearms mean lots of shooting?

That a totalitarian state would be inevitably reqd to enforce 1 child is also fear-mongering, designed to obscure the argument.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', ' ')...Someone who wants to murder people clearly has a genetic disorder ...
Care to substantiate this in any way? (Dr Mengele's theories on Jews will not be considered).
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S
Top

Postby EnergySpin » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 00:15:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'ve seen military situations in TV shows and movies where a soldier gets badly wounded and won't last long, and his comrades sometimes give him an overdose of painkillers to put him out of his misery. This looks like an act of mercy to me.

Basic military medicine triage: Morphine to those that will not make it, ketamine to those who will.
A civilization will be judget by how it treats its weak; most of the people who argue for killing the tards, use the argument that more resources will be left to those who can provide. No human can ever payback the energy that it went into creating him or her with his physical work alone. Otherwise he or should would have been the proverbial perpetual engine.
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Postby turmoil » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 00:31:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', 'R')eading this thread, it's clear you all should put your genes on the ground and stomp them to death.


lol...I'm guessing thats sarcastic, but I just think we need to be realistic. Religion has blinded us, the corporations have blinded us, the people that wrote history blinded us.

We are clever little monkeys, but we have grown clever enough to blindfold ourselves. And that is stupid.
"If you are a real seeker after truth, it's necessary that at least once in your life you doubt all things as far as possible"-Rene Descartes

"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth"-Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot
Top

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 00:35:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Liamj', 'I')f the world became a living hell and people chose this, I'd streak the CBD.
I don't know that lingo, Liam. What does it mean; I speak Californian.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"') Abandon hope, all ye who download PDF here.
That's a quote from the article posted today at energybulletin.net. Pretty much trumps and overrides this whole discussion. People aren't going to change in any rational way to the coming atmospheric disaster. I think I know why: people know it at some level and say to themselves, 'it hasn't happened yet, so why worry about it. What can ya do anyway. Just gonna keep living for now. Wait and see.'. So they aren't gonna respond to any other problems such as excess population. This kind of gloomy upcoming problem has been around for a while. The response being, yeah right, we'll believe it when we see it. Dave Roberts at Gristmill writes a good summary.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Postby linlithgowoil » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 06:16:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's just the people who really have no hope who should be put down.


Doctors routinely give people no hope only for them to have a so called miracle recovery not long after. Doctors often dont have any clue as to what a person's chances are - everyone is different.

The problem with euthenasia, abortion etc. are that they involve a society having a big change in ideology. People's lives are no longer valued simply because they are a person and are alive - they are only valued if their life has some other value - e.g. economic etc.

What is wrong with simply valuing someone because they are a person? I ask the question again - would you really murder your parents if they became ill and needed a lot of care? If not, why not? Is it because you love them? So, you are asking people to put love in the bin and just look at everything from a brutal competition for resources viewpoint. That is non-human. Anyone who thinks in such a way has a mental defect.
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland
Top

THE LIVING YOUNG, i mean DEAD!

Postby T4chibanaUkyo » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 10:50:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', '
')If you keep having more children, then there will be a time during your and theirs lifetime where you will either eat them, or eat you or both of them will end up in burgers eaten by strangers.


Very scary truth, My mom is living with a roommate, who is 42, divorced and has had 5 kids! (Can't he keep his willy wonka in his pants?) The children are spanned out. (21, 20, 13, 8, and 5) Its a horrible thought that here is an aging man that will try to protect his 8 year old girl and 5 year old boy during these tough times. (The 13 year old can hold his own)

Anohter quote about this eating humans thing, during my initial thoughts about PO, I had this anger that our dads and grandads had time to prevent this disaster....but did nothing! I thought the perfect payback is for their children to eat them, or any young person to eat anyone older than 50 or 60, as a sign of respect for the great future that they have provided us. But then again, if this will become bad times, and food will be scarce....i think that if it came down to it, the old should sacrifice their bodies to the younger generation. They had their time to live, it's like they killed our future just to extend their old people's lives. That, to some, could be called "theft".

There. I have thrown the perverbial "meat" gauntlet out on the field. Who will eat it first?
User avatar
T4chibanaUkyo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Postby Doly » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 10:51:45

I doubt it's going to get that bad.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Postby Eli » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 14:41:45

"And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: ... "

JC
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Postby Falconoffury » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 15:09:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') ask the question again - would you really murder your parents if they became ill and needed a lot of care?


If either of my parents had cancer that spread to many parts of their bodies, and they were in a lot of pain, I would probably want them euthanized. This is meaningless suffering. It accomplishes nothing and proves nothing. There is meaningful suffering and there is meaningless suffering.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby EnergySpin » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 15:33:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Liamj', 'I')f the world became a living hell and people chose this, I'd streak the CBD.
I don't know that lingo, Liam. What does it mean; I speak Californian.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"') Abandon hope, all ye who download PDF here.
That's a quote from the article posted today at energybulletin.net. Pretty much trumps and overrides this whole discussion. People aren't going to change in any rational way to the coming atmospheric disaster. I think I know why: people know it at some level and say to themselves, 'it hasn't happened yet, so why worry about it. What can ya do anyway. Just gonna keep living for now. Wait and see.'. So they aren't gonna respond to any other problems such as excess population. This kind of gloomy upcoming problem has been around for a while. The response being, yeah right, we'll believe it when we see it. Dave Roberts at Gristmill writes a good summary.

The guy who wrote this got his 5 min in the media. Energybulletin.net had a rebuttal which were correct. In technical terms, the use of his forecasting model i.e. a quadratic polynomial is stupid. These kind of models are nice for local approximations ... once you get far ahead they are useless. World climate models are extremely nonlinear and prediction so far in the future is impossible. The analogy would be using the precipitation in the last 5 days to predict the precipitation in a year from now. Such models are useful only with an estimate of the error ... and the error in that case would be huge.
I saw the gloomy upcoming problem in the clinic today. One of my colleagues discovered PO and he was surfing the web all day ... said that he read that article yesterday and reached the conclusion that he should drive his car as much as possible and fly around the globe now, before the oil ends and it get too warm. Being the low life I am, I threw some pretty scare images of his neighboors eating his 2 mo daughter alive if he depletes oil too fast and he is conserving fuel now. It took me 2 hours though and I'm tired with the BS of economists masturbating with mathematical models they cannot comphrehend- nothing good ever came out of them. Maybe we will keep a few of them around, and the rest should be depolymerized
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Postby k_semler » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 19:59:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') ask the question again - would you really murder your parents if they became ill and needed a lot of care?


If either of my parents had cancer that spread to many parts of their bodies, and they were in a lot of pain, I would probably want them euthanized. This is meaningless suffering. It accomplishes nothing and proves nothing. There is meaningful suffering and there is meaningless suffering.


I would only do it if they specifically requested that I off them. Even then, I would probably just leave them a shotgun with one slug, tell them "do it yourself", and walk off.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top

Postby Macsporan » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 00:52:35

I'm stupid and crippled: why can't I pass on my genes?
Son of the Enlightenment
User avatar
Macsporan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu 09 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Postby k_semler » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 07:33:35

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Postby threadbear » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 16:09:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Macsporan', 'I')'m stupid and crippled: why can't I pass on my genes?



I'm fubar--f'd up beyond all reason. Hey, in some ways I'm smart as a whip, but in other ways functionally retarded. I can remember the most trivial details about arcane subjects, read 20 years ago, but not what I did yesterday, or even 5 minutes ago. My life is a confusion of missing umbrellas, misplaced shopping lists, befuddled reactions to mundane events.

I voluntarily withheld my genes from the gene pool, and the world is a better place.

Anyone who thinks they're so precious, their genes so special, and their fundamental rights so precious as to further burden the gene pool, should have a psychiatric exam--as well as being crippled and stupid, they're also profoundly narcissistic.

It's not the job of the state to impose this on people, but you know, when I see people who have three kids in succession with hereditary liver disease, get transplants and subsequently die after a short life time of agony, it disgusts me. And the media schlocks it up, goes along for the sentimantal joyride, and nooone protests that these people,morally, are the equivalent of John Gacy, the serial child killer.

If the media and institutions, in general, focussed less on the rights of the individual, and more on the responsibilities, social and humanitarian, there would be a different take on this. Same with the multiple birth phenomenon. It's immoral for women to have fertility treatment which implants several embryos. Wrong, wrong wrong.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby k_semler » Sun 31 Jul 2005, 03:48:47

I agree with you on your post except for the last paragraph where you sound like a Socialist sympathyser. The safety of the many DOES NOT outweigh the rights of the few, IMO. If you want to breed like a mad man, have fun. I just hope you can support all of those little food holes. If it were up to me, 90% of welfare would cease starting tomorrow. Unless you are severely physically and/or mentally retarded, GET A FUCKING JOB AND SUPPORT YOURSELF!!

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
--Thomas Jefferson

"It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it."
--George Washington

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves"
--William Pitt, 1783

"You should not examine legislation in the light of the benefits it will convey if properly administered, but in the light of the wrongs it would do, and harm it would cause if improperly administered."
--Lyndon Johnson

"Liberty has never come from government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of government. The history of liberty is a history of resistance. The history of liberty is a history of limitations of government power, not the increase of it."
--Woodrow Wilson

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes."
--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)

"Restriction on free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."
--Thurgood Marshall, former Supreme Court Justice

"Those who are willing to sacrifice essential liberty for the promise of a little temporary security, deserve neither."
--Benjamin Franklin
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Postby Liamj » Sun 31 Jul 2005, 08:20:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Liamj', 'I')f the world became a living hell and people chose this, I'd streak the CBD.
I don't know that lingo, Liam. What does it mean; I speak Californian.{/quote]
sorry, streak - nude public race or run, often done it fit of exuberance or mischief, to acheive notoriety etc.
CBD - central business district

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"') Abandon hope, all ye who download PDF here.
That's a quote from the article posted today at energybulletin.net. Pretty much trumps and overrides this whole discussion. People aren't going to change in any rational way to the coming atmospheric disaster. I think I know why: people know it at some level and say to themselves, 'it hasn't happened yet, so why worry about it. What can ya do anyway. Just gonna keep living for now. Wait and see.'. So they aren't gonna respond to any other problems such as excess population.
prob so, but in places & at times, at least some ppl are going to turn around and say, 'okay, seriously, what do we do now?'.
As said before, it might be too late to save missions to mars and personal robots, but it hopefully wont be too late to save literacy, iron smelting and frisbees. More people will eventually be more open to new ideas, as we were, be willing to try something new, if it can be explained intelligebly [sp? :-D ] and makes sense. I happen to think responsibility about population does make sense, and i know it doesn't mean "killing to 'tards" as someone (else) charmingly said.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his kind of gloomy upcoming problem has been around for a while. The response being, yeah right, we'll believe it when we see it. Dave Roberts at Gristmill writes a good summary.
will read it, ta.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', ' ')What is wrong with simply valuing someone because they are a person? Nothing, all that lives has merit.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')I ask the question again - would you really murder your parents if they became ill and needed a lot of care? If not, why not? Is it because you love them? So, you are asking people to put love in the bin and just look at everything from a brutal competition for resources viewpoint. That is non-human. Anyone who thinks in such a way has a mental defect. *sigh* And i suppose i need to be medicated and/or legislated against, and definately preached against.
You confabulate a straw man and then set it on fire. Euthanasia is not murder, i have never advocated nonvoluntary death (governments and commerce have got that covered). Would i kill my mother if she was incapacitated and asked me to? yes, with great effort. If she was incapacited and unable to express her will (i.e. vegetative)? yes again, with less reluctance, because she's raised it with me and made very clear her wishes on the subject. I would do both because i love her. Life support medicine is a weird view of love.
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron