Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I'm extra smart. Shouldn't I pass on my genes?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby BrownDog » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 01:46:59

At least you have a sense of humor, stupid_monkeys. ;)
User avatar
BrownDog
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: N. TX

Unread postby k_semler » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 01:54:40

The day I reproduce is the day aliens come from Uranus, remove live sperm from my testicals, and inject it into a female recipiant that is a 10 on a scale of 10 of sexyness. Considering there has only been one woman I ever knew that was that hot, I wouldn't count on it anytime soon. God/Evolution/Sex Impulse sure isn't doing it now, and I highly doubt it ever will. I might as well count on Alien intervention sooner than counting on someone actually finding me attractive. (That ain't ever gonna happen).
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Unread postby turmoil » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 01:59:19

"Laughter is the best medicine." - Someone

As for me, the irony of humor and the beauty of music is why life is worth living.

It's unfortunate that both require the pain of the human condition.
"If you are a real seeker after truth, it's necessary that at least once in your life you doubt all things as far as possible"-Rene Descartes

"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth"-Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 03:05:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', 'i') dont trust people who dont want children. i also dont trust people who support population control, because its always 'somebody else' that has to die, rather than them. i think these kind of people always envision other people dying and making sacrifices, but, of course, they'd be alive and well to enjoy the less crowded world.



I don't want children, and if I got cancer, I'd let it take me. When your time is up, your time is up. I wouldn't accept an organ transplant or assisted life support unless a full recovery was expected. If I couldn't be a productive member of society, and was a burden to others, I'd elect to clock out. Do I have a death wish? No, in fact, I haven't needed to see a doctor except for checkups in 30 years, due to taking quite good care of my health. :-D

I support population reduction, not just control. I am not so myopic as most people, with regard to reality and the obvious future. If we don't change our ways, our ways will be changed for us.

I don't trust people who want to have lots of children and find population control replusive, as they are obviously very selfish and concern themselves with enjoying only their time on earth, with little concern for the quality of life, or the legacy they will leave to the generations to follow.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Unread postby linlithgowoil » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 05:43:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t´s a given that the vast majority of folks are like BrownDog and that blowhard Linlithgowoil; that the next best thing to immortality is to have offspring. And the more, the better.


No idea where you got the immortality part. I said i dont approve of population control. Population control is always advocated by people who loathe children because they can't be arsed looking after them. In my experience, those who chose not to have children did it because they simply wanted to spend 100% of their time 'enjoying life', and didn't want it spoiled by having to take the time to look after someone else.

Their decision is NEVER to do with 'preserving the world for future generations' - dont make me laugh. Someone who does not want to continue their family by having children obviously has no interest in the future of humanity at all.

Do a survey of people with no children. I can guarantee they place money and material possesions very high on their list of priorities - i would very much doubt they care about the quality of life of a future person living in 2050 - much like everyone else.

Do you really want to live in a world full of old bastards clinging on to life who are miserable because they decided not to have children but then realised having children is one of the greatest gifts and priviliges you can have?

Also - who is going to look after all these old bastards when they are old? Answer - OTHER PEOPLE'S CHILDREN. And, you old bastards will PAY them to look after you, when you could have been looked after for free by your own children, and experienced a loving relationship at the same time.
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland

Unread postby Kickinthegob » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 06:06:30

stupid_monkeys wrote:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ll i'm asking is if you are convincing people not to breed (or at least control population) how would you do it?


When I first saw that site the first thing I did was get a VHEMT tattoo on my forhead and this is how I convince people! Seriously, some people see a site like that and think, wow, I am a member and didn't even know it. As for the others I have no idea, maybe they get offended and angry or maybe they had some kind of preconcieved notion about it?

Warning! Fox News deflector shields up before clicking!

Marginalization is a big word!

linlithgowoil, you sound angry!
User avatar
Kickinthegob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Unread postby The_Virginian » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 06:41:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ll i'm asking is if you are convincing people not to breed (or at least control population) how would you do it?


Pay poor folks not to have more than one child. Give extra- NON FOOD_ rations to those who choose this route, make it "GOOD" to have stable monogomous relationships by government incentives, and even more incentives to have less children.

No Taxes (a reverse of what I feel is right), but positive incentive for the masses.

Those wealthy, SMART, or "edumacated" enough will avoid Government manipulation over their lives ( whether taxes or positive incentitives)...and the rest of the Sheeple will be culled with out resorting to murder. (as in China, when people violate the "one child" policy- and are nabbed red handed- they are sent to camps, and the children often worked to death.)

How it will happen in reality?

Sponsored PLUAGES.

WARS.

MURDER.

Governmnet sponsored STARVATION. (like Ireland, Somalia, Sudan, Ethiopia etc.)

[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watchv=Ai4te4daLZs&feature=related[/url] "My soul longs for the candle and the spices. If only you would pour me a cup of wine for Havdalah...My heart yearning, I shall lift up my eyes to g-d, who provides for my needs day and night."
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Madpaddy » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 06:57:13

Lin wrote,
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')opulation control is always advocated by people who loathe children because they can't be arsed looking after them. In my experience, those who chose not to have children did it because they simply wanted to spend 100% of their time 'enjoying life', and didn't want it spoiled by having to take the time to look after someone else.

Their decision is NEVER to do with 'preserving the world for future generations' - dont make me laugh. Someone who does not want to continue their family by having children obviously has no interest in the future of humanity at all.


I think I would have to agree with the above statement except to change the "always advocated" to "usually advocated". The people I know who do not have children would be far greater consumers of scarce resources than me who has 2 children - they take foreign holidays at least 2-3 times a year. They go out more, they buy more useless shit etc. This is simply because they can. When you have children the time, money and often the inclination to do these things is removed. And yes sometimes I envy those who can go out, drink a gallon of beer, come home at 5 am and crash in the bed until the following evening because they won't have junior leaping up and down on top of their head at 6:30 am.

Mind you, it is better IMO not to have children than watch the phenomenon in this country now where many children are dropped (often still sleeping) to a creche at 6:30am while mammy and daddy commute 60 miles to Dublin to work, come home collect the kids at 7pm from the creche and put them to bed.
User avatar
Madpaddy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Fri 25 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Liamj » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 07:23:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', '
')No idea where you got the immortality part. I said i dont approve of population control. Population control is always advocated by people who loathe children because they can't be arsed looking after them. In my experience, those who chose not to have children did it because they simply wanted to spend 100% of their time 'enjoying life', and didn't want it spoiled by having to take the time to look after someone else.

Their decision is NEVER to do with 'preserving the world for future generations' - dont make me laugh. Someone who does not want to continue their family by having children obviously has no interest in the future of humanity at all.

Do a survey of people with no children. I can guarantee they place money and material possesions very high on their list of priorities - i would very much doubt they care about the quality of life of a future person living in 2050 - much like everyone else.

Do you really want to live in a world full of old bastards clinging on to life who are miserable because they decided not to have children but then realised having children is one of the greatest gifts and priviliges you can have?

Also - who is going to look after all these old bastards when they are old? Answer - OTHER PEOPLE'S CHILDREN. And, you old bastards will PAY them to look after you, when you could have been looked after for free by your own children, and experienced a loving relationship at the same time.

I don't mind Lin. being angry, s/he isn't a troll, just someone having their personal mythology challenged. Guess i'll have to do the decent thing and broaden their obviously limited horizon.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')opulation control is always advocated by people who loathe children because they can't be arsed looking after them.

I advocate pop.control, despite having a daughter who lights up my life. I've turned down 3 fulltime (for parttime) jobs since she was born so can spend more time with her, haven't regretted for a millisecond, in fact i feel sorry for all you fulltime fools, and positively malevolent towards anyone who puts preschool kids in full time care (cos i've seen the all too frequent maladjustment that results).

Lin: I don't trust ppl who have lots of kids, they're always tired & irritable, their kids are often starved of affection and stimulation, and the older ones always get forced into child labour (sibling or elder care, housework..).
I know its a great compensation to project ones own unfulfilled wishes onto as many offspring as possible, pushing away fear of death and of the future, but does that really justify parasitising your more thoughtful neighbours? (via baby bonus', publicly funded schooling & childcare, discount or free healthcare in UK & Aus anyway, tax benefits...).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')o a survey of people with no children. I can guarantee they place money and material possesions very high on their list of priorities - i would very much doubt they care about the quality of life of a future person living in 2050 - much like everyone else.

How ironic your post followed MQs, a guy who obviously puts a fair # of hours into thinking & facilitating dialogue on 2050 qality of life. But don't let the evidence sway you.
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S
Top

Unread postby killJOY » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 09:02:31

linlithgowoil claims to NOT TRUST PEOPLE WHO HAVEN'T HAD CHILDREN, so that means he must HATE ALL THE POPES AND PRIESTS IN HISTORY (aside from those who are not pederasts).

linlithgowoil tries to come off as a self-less, generous parent concerned about the future of humanity, but let's look at what the bastard really says:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', 'i')m afraid that by implementing population control etc. and policies like it, you are becoming non-human and treating people as nothing but animals who consume resources.

its not nice. i say bring on the crash and everything will take care of itself


LINLITHGOWOIL IS ON RECORD ADVOCATING MASS DEATH.

Try to control our numbers, and we're "non-human." Breed like animals and we're human. linlithgowoil has a brain malfunction.
Last edited by killJOY on Mon 25 Jul 2005, 09:36:45, edited 1 time in total.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^
Top

Unread postby sklump » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 09:12:48

Reminder: there is no shortage of people. With 6.5 billion of us, we can now leave parenting to those who really, really want to do it.

I look at small children now with pity. Most of them are goners. Anyone having children now, I'm sorry but I think you are living in denial. There will be all kinds of children to adopt, from your own back yard, within 10-15 years, if we're lucky.

I've got my surgery done: with expensive energy, it will become an option for the rich. Do it now. If we're all wrong and our way of life continues, you can get it reversed. If it doesn't, and you can't, you'll be glad you did it when you did.
As Canadian as ... possible, under the circumstances
User avatar
sklump
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Unread postby Doly » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 09:20:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sklump', '
')I've got my surgery done: with expensive energy, it will become an option for the rich. Do it now. If we're all wrong and our way of life continues, you can get it reversed. If it doesn't, and you can't, you'll be glad you did it when you did.


This may be a good idea for males, but what about females? There is more risk of complications.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby sklump » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 13:08:35

The Essure (aka STOP) process takes 15 minutes on local anasthetic. You don't need to get a hysterectomy or even a tubal anymore.

I wouldn't be surprised if it weren't well-known in the USA. It was invented in Australia and it's available in Canada and parts of Europe. But the Republicans don't generally make birth control more available.

Complications? I've know dozens of sterilized people. I've never heard of anyone's complications. Fundies try to scare people, and abstinence education is a big hit down Stateside, but it's ridiculous.

Complications? How about twins from a mystery-rapist father that the cops won't have time to investigate? That's complications.

Admittedly, reversibility is not really an option for women.
As Canadian as ... possible, under the circumstances
User avatar
sklump
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Unread postby SpaciousDreamer » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 16:13:26

Essure is an interesting new sterilization procedure that implants small springs into a woman's fallopian tubes and allows scar tissue to grow, effectivley blocking the tube. I plan to get one as soon as I can.

As is true for all sterilization procedures, there is less risk of complication than typically results from pregnancy. In a posk-peak world with less access to medical care (and BC), pregnancy will again become an enormous health risk and a lot of women could die in childbirth as was common throughout history. But please, don't go into a vasectomy or any procedure believing it to be reversible; while technically true, it is usually more expensive and not insured. Adopt instead.

I agree with sklump, I also feel sorry for many young kids I see, including my own cousins. There is indeed no shortage of people, so those who feel less inclined to parent should leave the experience to those who stongly desire it. I do not have maternal feelings, so why follow the LifeScript®? Just because everyone else pops out an infant, I should too? I am not a person prone to materialism or selfishness, indeed I feel forgoing reproduction is one of the greatest sacrifices one can make toward a sustainable future. I'd rather help people already alive than create more hungry mouths.

It's irresponsible to make generalizations about those who choose to breed or not. I see a lot of breeders buy tons of useless crap for their kids, PVC playgrounds and plastic disposable garbage, not to mention a mountain of Pampers and a HughJass van or SUV to haul kids around in...is that better or worse than the childfree person's jet travel and recyclable beer bottles? There are the rare parents who restrict TV and junk purchases, just as there are childfree people (like me) who don't buy anything they can make and make every effort to conserve resources. Materialism is bad for anyone, and so is debt. Kids drive up a lot of debt and by their nature are conformists: they want the cool toys and amusement park trips their friends get, and so nag parents to consume more.

Controlling population through education and health services is better than having mother nature do it for you.
Pretty girls make graves.
User avatar
SpaciousDreamer
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby gt1370a » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 19:35:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('stupid_monkeys', '
')7. gt1370a - Can't afford it? Don't have the kids. Btw, this won’t work cause people are stupid and will have sex every night to pop one out, in hopes that it will survive the resource depletion problems of the 21st century.


You forgot the part about making abortion free. Maybe people are too stupid to use birth control, but they might be smart enough to get a free abortion if taxes are no longer going to subsidize their offspring.

I never understood that anyway... you have kids, you place MORE of a burden on the system in the form of schools, roads, cops, etc., and you pay LESS in taxes? Obviously a strategy to promote population growth, which is needed for a growth-based economy. But now facing resource depletion, it no longer makes sense.
User avatar
gt1370a
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 19:52:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('k_semler', 'T')he day I reproduce is the day aliens come from Uranus, .


Are you speaking cryptically, Semler?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby mgibbons19 » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 19:53:14

I'll go on record with the prokids crowd. Not because we need more ppl. We certainly don't. But, nothing ties you into the future more than having a stake in it. This shit matters because my two girls have to grow up in it. And if TSHTF, I will ensure they survive.

And, those who advocate fewer or no children often come off as arrogant fucks who would be more than happy to impose their idea-logy on the rest of the world. Granted, they will tell you it's not ideology, but they are pretty certain they've seen the future, and they're ready to fix it for us (the "sheople"). Good thing we've got those guys think for us, since we're so stupid.

Jeez, listen to yourselves.
mgibbons19
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby mgibbons19 » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 19:56:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('k_semler', 'T')he day I reproduce is the day aliens come from Uranus, .


Are you speaking cryptically, Semler?


He's saying he's gay. NTTAWWT.
mgibbons19
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby The_Virginian » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 20:06:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') look at small children now with pity. Most of them are goners.


Then you don't know my nephue.

He's 2.5 Y.O.

He climbes fences, wrestles with me, hits well, kicks while on his back on the floor (good defense). Likes to ride donkeys and ponies (with adult help of course), has knife set aside for his 5th B-Day, Could repeat the ABC's at 2, Is of stocky build -but tall- He will be big n' Burly. His portuguees Jewish decent gives him somewhat darker skin in the sun...well adapted to his climate.

He is "fearless" yet listens to his mother.

Given a decent shot, he will survive...His wits will be sharpened with Logic (talmud) and his outdoor skills with me...

He will be trained to outlast and outlive.

Do not "Pity" the children, they will have no time for "sympathy" either invest the time and effort into those already born (assuming you choose not top have more/your own) to give them a better chance...
[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watchv=Ai4te4daLZs&feature=related[/url] "My soul longs for the candle and the spices. If only you would pour me a cup of wine for Havdalah...My heart yearning, I shall lift up my eyes to g-d, who provides for my needs day and night."
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby k_semler » Mon 25 Jul 2005, 20:13:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('k_semler', 'T')he day I reproduce is the day aliens come from Uranus, .


Are you speaking cryptically, Semler?


:lol: :lol:
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron