by MicroHydro » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 17:54:25
Nessie is definitely ruled out. The lake is geologically very young, created in the current interglacial period. Also, Loch Ness is simply not biologically productive enough to support a reproductive population of any sort of large animal.
Bigfoot was possible (giantopithecus was real in Asia), but increasingly unlikely with each passing year. Alleged bigfoot hair samples were non-primate (bear, cow) and not even a trace of non-human primate DNA has been recovered from scat. If there ever was a large primate living in the Pacific Northwest, it has probably been extict for a long time.
As for the WTC towers, anyone who understands high school physics knows they were imploded. If the energy required to pulverize the concrete and create the cloud of dust and chips had come from gravitational collapse, the collapse would have taken at least 12 seconds, not the 10 second freefall caught on camera. (Think of a muscleman smashing a concrete block on the floor with a sledgehammer versus just swinging at the floor. In both cases, the hammer meets the floor. But, the hammer smashing the concrete block will be slowed down, and take longer to hit the floor underneath the block.)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')onsider also that apologists for the official conspiracy theory propose that 30% of the gravitational collapse energy was necessary to create the pyroclastic cloud of debris: that is, in their own analysis, this energy came out of the gravitational energy. This means that the time of fall would have been slowed further than what was observed. When a body of mass m falls from a height h, acted upon by gravitational acceleration g, it converts its potential energy PE = m x g x h into kinetic energy KE = (1/2) x m x (v exp2). Here h = (1/2) x g x (t exp2), t = time of fall, and v =g x t, where v = velocity. Removal of 30% of the PE to pulverize concrete essentially reduces the amount of energy available from falling, effectively reducing the gravitational acceleration to something less than g.
Substituting, in the above equations we have (1.0 - 0.3) x PE = 0.7 x PE = m x g' x h, where PE, m and h are as before and g' = the effective gravitational acceleration. Hence, comparing terms for PE, g' = 0.7 g. The time of collapse under g' will also increase. If we let the effective collapse time be t', then comparing terms for constant h, (1/2) x g x (t exp2) = (1/2) x g' x (t' exp2) =
(1/2) x 0.7g x (t' exp2). Hence, (t exp2) = 0.7 x (t' exp2), or (t/t') = SQRT (0.7) = 0.837. Or, t' = 1.195 t.
Now the observed time t = 10 seconds (a free fall time, the fastest possible time under g = 9.8 m/sec/sec = 32 ft/sec/sec = 32 ft/s exp2). For the cloud debris creation to absorb 30% of the gravitational energy, the observed time of fall would be 10s x 1.195, or almost 12 seconds. This long a collapse time was observed by no one. Clearly, there are serious flaws in the official explanation/conspiracy theory.
http://www.physics911.net/thermite.htm
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel