Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Creationism

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Strummer » Sun 14 Dec 2014, 18:27:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'I')f we do fall back and go extinct, then there may be time for another species to advance


That will not be possible, ever on this planet again. They would need the easy access to specific resources, and especially easy energy to make the crucial steps towards technology, and they won't have that. Easy to get and extremely rich metal ores, fossil fuels and all the rest. We used it all up, and that's why there won't be another technological civilization on Earth ever again if we screw it up.
Strummer
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2013, 04:42:14

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sun 14 Dec 2014, 19:02:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Synapsid', 'S')ix,

The reason I asked the question is that I know of no evidence for a large impact in connection with the Permo-Triassic extinction. There was a claim a decade or two ago from a worker at UCSB but no one could duplicate the work, or even the sampling.


Thanks for the correction.

My larger point is that we ARE gonna get wiped out on this planet one way or another if we do not technologically stop that and also branch out OFF the planet in time. There is no way around this, this is a hard wall reality, and Stephen Hawking is right about it and KJ on this forum is right about it and I'm right about it.

If it's meant to be then it will happen. But there are a LOT of general good reasons, just as taxpayers, to be supportive of nasa and funding and continuing to push forward. If space can start making money then it will take off like a wildfire, but until then it does need some government help just as Columbus needed the Spanish crown's help to get it started.

There is NO logical or rational reason to be against space development and new scientific knowledge.

Other than the whole idea of it so radically contradicts with "collapse" and "doomerism" and just talking about the climate and environment all the time and if anyone tries to speak up and mention there may be another 8 billion earth's out then that's balphemy or something.

I say do BOTH, save the trees we have, but also set some aside and build the darn boats and send some seeds over to the other shore.

Didn't mean this to turn into another space thread, it's SG's fault he brought it up first. :lol:

SeaGypsy, I don't get you on this issue man, you're a dreamer and like to sail the seas. Space is the same darn thing, it's just the last frontier.

Bringing this back around to religion and the meaning of life, we've got some good conclusions here. Newfie mentions maybe we're meant to break down things and consume, maybe that is the purpose of life. And Genesis does tell us to go forth and multiply. But it's also true that this planet is full. So.. it is time.. to follow the Bible and go forth and multiply OFF the planet.
Last edited by Sixstrings on Sun 14 Dec 2014, 19:07:11, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Creationism

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 14 Dec 2014, 19:03:52

Feel free to ignore my last post, Virus.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sun 14 Dec 2014, 19:19:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'F')eel free to ignore my last post, Virus.


Why don't you expand your thoughts on it.

I think a summary of what you said would be that we have to get things right on this planet before venturing off it?

The problem with that idea is that there will ALWAYS be problems and things will NEVER be perfect. The problems are the reason to head for the frontier, to start with. There were all kinds of problems when Columbus sailed. There were problems in the 60s, when the Apollo program started, people said we needed the money for the poor not the moon.

But there were poor folks in the 60s and there are poor folks in 2014 and there may be poor folks forever UNLESS we get to some kind of Star Trek future and AI and finally solve some of these problems we've always had.

The answer isn't standing still, it's moving forward.

I tell ya what. Compromise. As a voter, I'd support money for climate change and environment stuff IF just as much money were spent on space. You want to know what's sad? I forget the exact number, but it's something like the total global space budget is like 2 or 4% of the MILITARY budget. Just imagine all that could be done if that money were spent on space exploration instead, and that would serve the same function military spending does as far as advancing tech.

You're right SG that it's time to pull together and save the planet if that is possible, but the devil is in the details on that and we're always going to argue about carbon taxes and cap and trade etc etc -- but okay I do agree with you, I just say it is just as important to branch out too. WHY is growth just bad no matter what? Is that the issue here? That nobody on this forum can psychologically accept that maybe growth doesn't have to stop?

There's a whole solar system and galaxy out there, with more resources than the human brain can comprehend.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Strummer » Sun 14 Dec 2014, 19:24:15

The real external threats to humanity are asteroids and a supervolcano explosion. The first one can be solved by building a warning/elimination system. The second one by building underground shelters, storage facilites and "bio-archives".

But there's the problem... underground shelters are mundane, boring, and definitely not sexy enough to build a modern religion for retards around, unlike space travel.
Strummer
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2013, 04:42:14

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sun 14 Dec 2014, 19:27:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Strummer', 'T')hat will not be possible, ever on this planet again. They would need the easy access to specific resources, and especially easy energy to make the crucial steps towards technology, and they won't have that. Easy to get and extremely rich metal ores, fossil fuels and all the rest. We used it all up, and that's why there won't be another technological civilization on Earth ever again if we screw it up.


I'm not sure you're 100% right about that, the planet has billions of years left to go. We've had a lot of close calls before. "Snowball earth" almost never recovered.

But okay let's say you are right. We're in the easter island scenario, the last trees are getting cut down to make trinkets.

I'll agree to save some trees if you'd agree to make some boats too, fair enough?
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Subjectivist » Sun 14 Dec 2014, 19:29:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Strummer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'I')f we do fall back and go extinct, then there may be time for another species to advance


That will not be possible, ever on this planet again. They would need the easy access to specific resources, and especially easy energy to make the crucial steps towards technology, and they won't have that. Easy to get and extremely rich metal ores, fossil fuels and all the rest. We used it all up, and that's why there won't be another technological civilization on Earth ever again if we screw it up.


Don't be silly, if another species has time to evolve intelligence the natural resevoirs will have time to refill. Most of the world copper and gold deposits come from eroded volcano deposits and that certainly won't end any time in the next billion years or so. The very rich Sudbury deposits in Canada are an ancient asteroid impact that has eroded and is rich in all sorts of metal ores.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio
Top

Re: Creationism

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 14 Dec 2014, 19:42:10

6, despite appearances, I work 7 days a week, 20 to 30 days straight. I don't have time to fully expand on your status as a virus minded human being who believes in an utter fantasy as the solution to the situation we are actually in.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 14 Dec 2014, 23:14:32

Six,

I can see you quoted my post, now perhaps go back and try to comprehend it.

From the volume of you writting it's pretty clear you don't give much time to thing about what others say.

There is no conversation, it's more like turning on a spigot.

BTW, it was Murray Gell-Mann

"Earth is rotting, life is the waste."
Quoted in Deep Survival by Larence Gonzalez.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 15 Dec 2014, 01:58:45

It's really odd to me how contentious this is, to you guys.

I do not understand it, not one bit, how anyone can be hostile to space development.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Quinny » Mon 15 Dec 2014, 17:13:15

Because it's a waste of precious resources that are needed to help normal people.
Because we are destroying our environment to produce a barren techtopia that thinks it can trump nature.
Because it's a fantasy that most of the world don't give a hoot about.
Because research into rocket technology has been used to improve the killing capacity of weapons whilst de-personalising war.
could carry on and on really...............
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Creationism

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 15 Dec 2014, 18:39:33

I was trying to think of a metaphor last night. All I could think of is:

A bunch of rich brats gate crash a party in the ghetto. They proceed to destroy the place, having fun. When the hosts ask them to help clean up, the answer is 'screw you lot, we live in penthouses & own islands you have never heard of, that's where we are off to, clean up your own mess!'
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Newfie » Mon 15 Dec 2014, 20:05:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'I')t's really odd to me how contentious this is, to you guys.

I do not understand it, not one bit, how anyone can be hostile to space development.


You don't understand, good, that shows progress. (Short post, great!)

Now the hard part. Assume folks here are not stupid jerks and have something to say. Something you have not heard. You may yet hear.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Creationism

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 05:37:02

Some people have no conscious sense of ethics. How can it be not of supreme importance to have thoroughly evolved as a species, not only capable of space exploration, but verifiably audited worth as a species to contemplate extending our progeny beyond the limits of this solar system? It cannot be right to contemplate extending ourselves when we are in fact a verified pathogen on the planet which gave birth to us.

Taking the above as a moral & ethical absolute, I am left with the schoolboy version of space development only. We get to burn around making cool selfies at a million bucks a pop, utterly stuck with the real solar system limitation imposed on us, not giving a flying flip about the mess under our feet, or 35 light minutes below, to which we have no choice but to return.

Hawkings may be a hero to some, but to me his ethics reek worse than his presentation.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Creationism

Unread postby dinopello » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 10:21:49

I think I can settle this space development issue. And, that is just a matter of sequencing. So, once the human species has figured out a way to repair the damage we've made to the earth and enact a lifestyle that allows us all to live in harmony with the rest of the natural world on earth and is at peace with each other on THIS planet THEN we head out to space and the rest of the universe to spread our enlightened thoughts. Sound good ?
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Subjectivist » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 10:56:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'I') think I can settle this space development issue. And, that is just a matter of sequencing. So, once the human species has figured out a way to repair the damage we've made to the earth and enact a lifestyle that allows us all to live in harmony with the rest of the natural world on earth and is at peace with each other on THIS planet THEN we head out to space and the rest of the universe to spread our enlightened thoughts. Sound good ?


It will not work if humans are to remain human. Those who call themselves enlightened are also those who are inwardly focused, they do not change things they accept the changes that come from outside passively.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio
Top

Re: Creationism

Unread postby dinopello » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 12:36:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'I') think I can settle this space development issue. And, that is just a matter of sequencing. So, once the human species has figured out a way to repair the damage we've made to the earth and enact a lifestyle that allows us all to live in harmony with the rest of the natural world on earth and is at peace with each other on THIS planet THEN we head out to space and the rest of the universe to spread our enlightened thoughts. Sound good ?


It will not work if humans are to remain human. Those who call themselves enlightened are also those who are inwardly focused, they do not change things they accept the changes that come from outside passively.


Is remaining human your objective ? I'm more of a go with the flow person. If we evolve, then so be it. Do you think it would offend the creator or something ?
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Creationism

Unread postby wildbourgman » Thu 18 Dec 2014, 20:08:30

http://www.vice.com/read/randal-koene-b ... oading-438

I think this article really connects to this discussion. I think the part a copied below is really telling. Scientist think that downloading your brain to a internet cloud is possible, but having your spirit basically upload to heaven is nonsense. As long as they are in power it's all possible, but a higher power with infinite wisdom couldn't have already beat them to the punch. I think the bold new concept in the below paragraph is not a new concept at all it's what religious people have been saying is possible for thousands of years. It's the mechanics thats different.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat's that?
A SIM is not merely an artificial intelligence, but a re-instantiation of a specific human mind—a human mind downloaded to a computer. Neuroscientists are 99.9% percent convinced that the brain is a mechanism. It is something that computes, something that carries out functions. If you can figure out how it works, you can build a replacement for it. The idea that you can take a small piece of the brain and build a replica for it is very mainstream and well understood. Why not do that with the whole brain? And then why not upload that to a computer so that we can process more data and store it better, the way a computer does, organizing thoughts into folders that we can access whenever we choose?
So, in the future, if we're able to download our brains, will brainless bodies be genetically grown for us? Or will we inhabit a more computer-like environment; a robot, say, or an android?
It would be interesting to inhabit a more virtual world. Or perhaps bodies that aren't built to survive in this environment, but somewhere else, like space. Living on Earth, where we need to breath oxygen, will no longer be necessary. We might have an existence in an environment more like the Cloud.It's not just a matter of the space we inhabit, but that the biological reasons for mortality vanish. So you could have art projects or science projects that would normally outstrip the lifespan of a normal person
wildbourgman
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun 07 Jul 2013, 10:05:52
Top

Re: Creationism

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 18 Dec 2014, 20:18:22

The Singularity doesn't carry much weight around this neck of the woods WBM.
It's last proponent here was also nuts about LENR which went where we all thought it would. The ideas may not be too technically grandiose but it's the issue of transference. What we each think of as ourself, is mechanically attached to the brain inside what we call our skull. Not what we see in a mirror, in an identical twin, our lover or a child, let alone an identikit robot self. When you figure out how to non temporarily transfer your conscious self away from the functionality of your brain, let us all know which yoga school you were at.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Creationism

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 18 Dec 2014, 20:30:15

I'm pretty sure the "soul" doesn't even exist in the sense that is a discernible thing. If it exists it is a collection, an amalgam, of feelings such as love, fidelity, loyalty, anger, fear, etc.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron