by pedalling_faster » Sun 20 Apr 2008, 09:25:16
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBean', 'A')fter you, for example do you agree or disagree with what I said in the part that of my post you didn't quote or comment? But even humble ignoramus like me has read enough to know that those figures are not generally worth the paper they are printed on, OPEC reserves, GDP, rigged inflation numbers, rigged employment numbers, PPT rigged stock exchange etc., the whole field of mainstream economics of market fundamentalism that almost categorically ignores the empirical methodology and intellectual honesty that is required for a field of science.
there are economists and there are economists.
e.g. John Shoven & George Leland Bach, 2 of my professors in college. they would look at rigged inflation numbers and say, "hey ! these are rigged !"
if memory serves, when some admin. needed a Stanford prof. to put a seal of approval on some BS economics wise, they hired Boskin.
not all economists are in the vein of bought-and-paid-for science.