by Rune » Sun 28 Jul 2013, 12:03:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o many of your posts seem to end with this sentence. Maybe the problem isn't with others failing to understand some great potential, but with you failing to understand the likely limits of that potential.
Collecting the genomes of a million high IQ people and then comparing them using sophisticated statistical analyses to the genomes of people with average IQs is simply another means of scientific inquiry.
This means of scientific inquiry would have been done long ago if it were possible. It has only been made possible by the ever-cheapening trend of gene-sequencing.
Gene sequencing used to be incredibly expensive just to get a single genome of worm. This is no longer the case. So the Wired article described a genius kid who works at an automated gene sequencing facility in china who wants to find out why he, himself, is so bright and why other kids exchibit very high IQs.
You don't have to confine yourself, when talking about high IQ, to those who are mental calculators. Bill Gates, for example, breezed through school because he was so bright. He is someone with a very high IQ; maybe no qualified and extremely rare genius, but someone who is obviously very bright. He also has other qualities such as personal drive and ambition that led to his success with Microsoft.
But the article focused on using a huge sample of genomes collected from the very bright to see if their is some genetic explanation for high IQ. No one knows what the outcomes of such an experiment would be. It could have multi-dimensional outcomes. No one knows.
No one knows what the results of a particular scientific inquiry will be until the scientific inquiry in question is perfomed. The analyses could yield some valuable information or they might not. No one knows.
But if its cheap to do, then it will be done by someone somewhere eventually. And this was what the article was about - a bright kid in china who wants to conduct this scientific inquiry into any possible genetic explanations for high IQ.
Seems pretty straight-forward to me.