by Subjectivist » Mon 09 Feb 2015, 16:45:25
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'Y')ou know Sub, I mostly believe in the christian message of Love (I just don't like the antiquated angry components. Are they all from the old testament?). Science and the bible agree that love binds us; social status-seeking hominids bound by tribal affiliation and displaced motherly love.
Let's hold hands and sing kumbaya now.

The New Testement has a few harsh spots as well, the time when Jesus whipped the money changers out of the Temple is probably the most used example.
The Old Testement has plenty of love in it, if you read carefully and think of it in terms of a Father relating to his favorite children. God is saddened by our failings, but like the Prodigal's father He always welcomes his children back home when they ask.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
-
Subjectivist
- Volunteer

-
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
- Location: Northwest Ohio
-
by ralfy » Mon 09 Feb 2015, 23:27:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '
')Universal health care is a want, not a need...
I think health care, especially universal health care (as most people are poor) is a need because most people
want to live as long as they can and keep their loved ones (especially infants and children) healthy.
(Font of "want" changed by me, for emphasis.)
From the poster who claims universal healthcare is a basic need vs. a want. And how does he defend that premise? Well, because people "WANT" it, of course!
A basic need is something that people want in order to keep infant mortality rates down and life expectancy rates up. A "want" is something that's not needed to ensure the two. Read this wiki entry for more details:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_needsWhat I offered is similar to what is given in modern lists, as mentioned in the second paragraph.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
Do you know what irony is? Are you familiar with groups like Monty Python, or modern adult cartoons which use sarcasm to point out how thoughtless people are? (Like "The Simpsons" or "Futurama")?
by ralfy » Mon 09 Feb 2015, 23:41:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I')f you didn't notice, I toned down my rant. Just for you outcast.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')TW, WHAT does your rant about environmental issues have to do with my point that saying a government program is a basic need because people "WANT" it is typical of far left economic babblespeak (and therefore I find it amusing)?
Looks like we still have something to argue about. It is not babblespeak, its commonsense and christian generosity.
What you call "commonsense" (sic), I call emotional thinking, based on wishes instead of economic constraints (AKA) reality -- and therefore nonsense.
What do I want? I want (over the long term) balanced budgets, supporting sustainable long term programs. That means the adults in the room (not the far left on economics) need to actually prioritize the programs and the amount we spend. Naturally this includes programs the right favors like the military (which is an expensive disaster -- for what we get, in my opinion).
Unfortunately from your ilk, we get more complaining about Christian values (when it suits your agenda) than viable decision points on things like education for people willing to do acceptable work vs. endless food stamps for morbidly obese people. Always whining for more does NOT equate to a sustainable set of government programs.
And as a taxpayer who is expected to pay for many of the endless programs the far left wants because they claim it is "Christian" and "common sense" as long as someone else is paying for it -- yes, I think there need to be adults (who can do arithmetic) in the room.
Economic constraints likely do not describe "reality" as they essentially involve numbers in hard drives.
If sustainability refers to ensuring that as many people remain as healthy as possible, then that is likely a "far left" view. The contrast is free market capitalism, which considers sustainability of economic growth.
As some become wealthier, they eventually influence the government, which controls military forces. That's why it is not coincidental that the U.S. military is used to prop up the petrodollar needed to support an economy dominated by consuming spending, using armaments from the defense industry, with multinational corporations poised to strike deals with newly installed authorities.
Finally, aren't the other points you raise also the result of the same type of economy? That is, consumer spending coupled with a welfare system to control a population which continues to vote for one pro-Wall Street administration after another?
by Tanada » Tue 10 Feb 2015, 09:23:04
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '
')Universal health care is a want, not a need...
I think health care, especially universal health care (as most people are poor) is a need because most people
want to live as long as they can and keep their loved ones (especially infants and children) healthy.
(Font of "want" changed by me, for emphasis.)
From the poster who claims universal healthcare is a basic need vs. a want. And how does he defend that premise? Well, because people "WANT" it, of course!
A basic need is something that people want in order to keep infant mortality rates down and life expectancy rates up. A "want" is something that's not needed to ensure the two. Read this wiki entry for more details:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_needsWhat I offered is similar to what is given in modern lists, as mentioned in the second paragraph.
by Tanada » Tue 10 Feb 2015, 17:27:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T'),
You are taking lots of words to justify the idea that we shouldn't take care of each other.
Who knows, maybe. Most other countries disagree and have some type of societal system in place to achieve that while we here still calling each other names because we're afraid the next guy is getting a better deal and resent him for it.
When the balloon goes up it is entirely possible that the system will breakdown. The difference will be that other country's medical delivery system is already designed so everyone can get some, they'll ration based on efficacy. Here we'll just continue to ration based on income.
I classify this as attacking the messenger instead of the message, but thanks for playing.
Not once have I ever said we should throw our neighbors, or other fellow humans under the bus to benefit ourselves.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
by Pops » Tue 10 Feb 2015, 18:01:59
Come on T, don't get all defensive. The idea you argued is "health is not a right," it's a common belief in the US - I'd say about the same as any conservative ideology, you aren't saying anything new.
Other countries think it is a right. And in the context of the Big Die-Off I think they will be better off for having a system in place to provide basic medicine while the majority of our
docs specialists will experience Peak Boob Job (PBJ) and sit around waiting to do a facelift until they are forced to start collecting cans along the road.
US medicine it twice as expensive as anywhere else (and not as good) because we spend 3-6 times as much on specialists.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n business, bad problems call for plain talk. The data I found says the dominant problem with U.S. health care costs is a labor problem with medical professionals. Wages and work rules (i.e., referral decisions leading to over-utilization, staffing levels in hospitals) have driven costs to a level that is now unbearable
http://www.forbes.com/sites/toddhixon/2 ... s-so-high/
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
-

Pops
- Elite

-
- Posts: 19746
- Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
- Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
-