Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion check?

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby threadbear » Sat 27 Sep 2008, 16:41:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'R')eal estate dove in Japan, but what did the general cost of goods, at the supermarket do? Also, oil wasn't a strong determining factor in the Japanese depression. Oil prices are likely going to remain surprisingly resilient, going forward, as most fiat is going to be debased, in the short term. You're basing your argument on the idea that prices tend to drop to match what the masses can afford. I can tell your age, by this argument. Having lived through 70's stagflations, I can guarantee that this is not always the case.


I was born in 1970, so I lived through it as a child. Nothing was ever more expensive than someone was willing to pay.

I totally agree that oil prices will remain high, but production is likely to drop as a result of demand destruction more than peak oil (though the effect will be exactly the same).

If you have credit you can absorb high prices today by promising to pay tomorrow, but if you don't have credit, this fact lower the ceiling on high prices a bit.

What in the 1970s cost more than people were willing to pay?

The point I am making may basically be describing a path to civil unrest as people begin to realize that the $10 in their pocket won't begin to cover the $50 of expenses they have just to survive.

But prices will come down to the level of income available to spend, one way or another.


Everything that is presently made in China, particularly clothing, was very expensive. Food--very expensive. I ate a lot of Kraft Dinner, as I'd just left home in '73. Most of the population was under the age of 30, and really struggling. Nobody had their own apartment. Rent, relative to income was crushing. We lived communally, often.

People get the concept of demand confused with desire. I would have preferred, I desired to eat more meat, but it didn't translate into demand, because I couldn't afford it. It's this economic atmosphere that encourages businesses to merge, consolidate, and then, ultimately cater to the upper 10% of income, because that is pretty much all that THEY can afford to do.
Last edited by threadbear on Sat 27 Sep 2008, 16:46:52, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby threadbear » Sat 27 Sep 2008, 16:44:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'C')hina is investing in the United States government.

They are buying influence.

When the time comes to attack Taiwan, they will call in the debt, and ask if we're willing to sink our economy in exchange for the island.

We'll threaten to nuke them, etc.

The end result will be the cancellation of most of the debt and the surrender of the island to the Chinese.

It's a business transaction.


This is likely a done deal. There is probably an implicit understanding that the US CANNOT threaten Iran, and cut off China's oil supply, nor can they interfere with China's desires in Taiwan. Don't worry about Taiwan, they'll be okay.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby BigTex » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 00:06:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Duende', 'B')ig Tex, while I agree with your basic premise - that 'in an environment of credit contraction and static wages, you will see demand destruction in the face of rising prices' - it will not happen quickly.

This is because people will continue to use those credit accounts which are plentiful and so easy to overexploit - credit cards. As long as the interest rates are "low" for credit cards (under 20%), people will use them to bridge the gap. Yes, they will paint themselves into a corner eventually, but this may slow down the collapse quite a bit.

It may be interesting to watch the personal debt figures over the next few months rise. Hell, for all we know at this time next year we'll be talking about a bail out for people with high credit card balances?


Here is a link to a story about banks reducing credit limits on a large scale in response to the current credit situation. We will see more and more of this I think, especially when people start using their credit card convenience checks to buy krugerrands.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 00:45:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')When the time comes to attack Taiwan, they will call in the debt, and ask if we're willing to sink our economy in exchange for the island.

We'll threaten to nuke them, etc.

The end result will be the cancellation of most of the debt and the surrender of the island to the Chinese.

It's a business transaction.
If you pop open your computer you will find it is made in Taiwan from "made in China" parts.

China will not "attack" Taiwan.

The only disagreement between them will be over how much of the former USA each one gets.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby misterno » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 16:59:04

my question is why is China buying bonds yielding %3? Are they stupid? There are many investments in the world that they can make more money.

What if they stop buying these bonds?
User avatar
misterno
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Somewhere super boring

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby cube » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 17:40:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')t's simply not possible to have sustained inflation without rising wages. Someone has to be able to buy things that are rising in price for prices to continue rising.
*I disagree*
This is the cube explanation:

Suppose a loaf of bread costs $3
and a cup of Starbucks coffee also costs $3
You have a budget of $6 therefore you can buy both bread and coffee today.
In a future inflationary depression scenario the cost of everyday goods may double in price.
In the future you'd spend $6 for a loaf of bread and buy no coffee.
You see....it adds up mathematically.
It's perfectly possible to have rising consumer prices and also stagnant wages. :)
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby BigTex » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 21:53:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')t's simply not possible to have sustained inflation without rising wages. Someone has to be able to buy things that are rising in price for prices to continue rising.
*I disagree*
This is the cube explanation:

Suppose a loaf of bread costs $3
and a cup of Starbucks coffee also costs $3
You have a budget of $6 therefore you can buy both bread and coffee today.
In a future inflationary depression scenario the cost of everyday goods may double in price.
In the future you'd spend $6 for a loaf of bread and buy no coffee.
You see....it adds up mathematically.
It's perfectly possible to have rising consumer prices and also stagnant wages. :)


That is true, but doesn't that mean that Starbucks would go out of business, which would put downward pressure on all prices, since there would be thousands of young hip unemployed people with no money who would no longer be able to buy anything because they lost their jobs at Starbucks?

I don't know the answer to this issue, I'm just freestyling like the rest of us.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby shady28 » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 22:28:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')t's simply not possible to have sustained inflation without rising wages. Someone has to be able to buy things that are rising in price for prices to continue rising.
*I disagree*
This is the cube explanation:

Suppose a loaf of bread costs $3
and a cup of Starbucks coffee also costs $3
You have a budget of $6 therefore you can buy both bread and coffee today.
In a future inflationary depression scenario the cost of everyday goods may double in price.
In the future you'd spend $6 for a loaf of bread and buy no coffee.
You see....it adds up mathematically.
It's perfectly possible to have rising consumer prices and also stagnant wages. :)


You guys should listen to Tex, he's exactly right on what the credit implosion means. In particular, the description of credit expansion and its relationship to consumption.

Consider, if I make 100/month extra this year, I can get a loan for $10,000 and use it to consume. If I get a raise next year for $100/mo, I can borrow another $10,000 and consume. I can keep on doing that ad infinitum. Each time I'm taking my 100/mo raise and multiplying it by 9x in consumption.

Now, if the credit market dries up and I lose my job... my debts go bad and I don't consume squat. The people that I owe money to lose their job, their debts go bad and they don't consume squat. Inventories build up at retailers who can't sell, demand for higher end products dries up.
Welcome to the Kondratieff Winter
User avatar
shady28
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed 06 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby eastbay » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 22:52:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shady28', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')t's simply not possible to have sustained inflation without rising wages. Someone has to be able to buy things that are rising in price for prices to continue rising.
*I disagree*
This is the cube explanation:

Suppose a loaf of bread costs $3
and a cup of Starbucks coffee also costs $3
You have a budget of $6 therefore you can buy both bread and coffee today.
In a future inflationary depression scenario the cost of everyday goods may double in price.
In the future you'd spend $6 for a loaf of bread and buy no coffee.
You see....it adds up mathematically.
It's perfectly possible to have rising consumer prices and also stagnant wages. :)


You guys should listen to Tex, he's exactly right on what the credit implosion means. In particular, the description of credit expansion and its relationship to consumption.

Consider, if I make 100/month extra this year, I can get a loan for $10,000 and use it to consume. If I get a raise next year for $100/mo, I can borrow another $10,000 and consume. I can keep on doing that ad infinitum. Each time I'm taking my 100/mo raise and multiplying it by 9x in consumption.

Now, if the credit market dries up and I lose my job... my debts go bad and I don't consume squat. The people that I owe money to lose their job, their debts go bad and they don't consume squat. Inventories build up at retailers who can't sell, demand for higher end products dries up.


And then prices briefly fall until the unsold merchandise is unloaded... meanwhile, the government is printing money like crazy trying to service the debt of the nation and that of the greater financial system, while funding 1/2 trillion dollar /yr wars via deficit spending thereby expanding the money supply by periodic infusions of many trillions.

I see great inflation on the horizon.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby cube » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 23:07:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')t's simply not possible to have sustained inflation without rising wages. Someone has to be able to buy things that are rising in price for prices to continue rising.
*I disagree*
This is the cube explanation:

Suppose a loaf of bread costs $3
and a cup of Starbucks coffee also costs $3
You have a budget of $6 therefore you can buy both bread and coffee today.
In a future inflationary depression scenario the cost of everyday goods may double in price.
In the future you'd spend $6 for a loaf of bread and buy no coffee.
You see....it adds up mathematically.
It's perfectly possible to have rising consumer prices and also stagnant wages. :)


That is true, but doesn't that mean that Starbucks would go out of business, which would put downward pressure on all prices, since there would be thousands of young hip unemployed people with no money who would no longer be able to buy anything because they lost their jobs at Starbucks?

I don't know the answer to this issue, I'm just freestyling like the rest of us.
The answer is very simple.
You'll pay $6 for that loaf of bread but only get to eat half of it because the other half goes to the now unemployed former Starbucks barrista.
how do you like my explanations? :wink:
//
Actually getting serious now:
Suppose your wife losses her job and simply cannot find another one.
One income will now have to be stretched to accommodate 2 people now. In such a scenario the grocery budget would contain just the necessities, no frills.
I think we're going to see the $6 loaf of bread within 7 years. I think that's a definite possibility.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby CrudeAwakening » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 23:24:36

Declining real wages would suggest that it is perfectly possible to have rising prices and stagnant wages. Hands up who has had a pay rise that's kept pace with price inflation (ex-CEOs of Wall St banks aside)?
"Who knows what the Second Law of Thermodynamics will be like in a hundred years?" - Economist speaking during planning for World Population Conference in early 1970s
User avatar
CrudeAwakening
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby BigTex » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 00:01:15

I think we have several stages of demand destruction, though, since so many of us live like kings compared to most of history.

First, demand destruction for new clothes.

Then, eating out.

Then, any form of entertainment.

Then, non-essential travel.

Then, flavored drinks.

Then, alcohol, tobacco and other vices.

And so on.

Food and water are the last to go.

By the time you get to food and water, though, no one has a job, partly because the need for most of the jobs was imaginary in the first place. Those jobs weren't NEEDED, they were just convenient to have and there were smart and eager people to do them.

I'll spare the zombie stuff.

The only thing that makes me wonder about the inflation thing is that all of our debts are denominated in today's dollars; therefore, rampant inflation would actually be a huge benefit to most consumers because it would devalue their debts. It surprises me that J6P would get such a good deal.


To a degree, being in debt is a great inflation hedge.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby cube » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 00:20:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I') think we have several stages of demand destruction, though, since so many of us live like kings compared to most of history.

First, demand destruction for new clothes.

Then, eating out.
.....
I live near a university and often walk along the main street which has all the shops. I'm guessing only 25% of the seats in all the restaurants are filled on average.
THAT'S IT!!!

The one example that really stood out in my mind was these 2 Vietnamese restaurants that were literally just 30 feet across from each other. One was filled while the other was dead. I looked at the menu for "Pho" (rice noodle soup) and walked 30 steps over to the next restaurant and noticed the same dish sold for only 25 cents difference!
I think that best summarizes the state of the economy. It's a race to the bottom to see how low you can go.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby Daphne64 » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 01:19:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'I') live near a university and often walk along the main street which has all the shops. I'm guessing only 25% of the seats in all the restaurants are filled on average.
THAT'S IT!!!

The one example that really stood out in my mind was these 2 Vietnamese restaurants that were literally just 30 feet across from each other. One was filled while the other was dead. I looked at the menu for "Pho" (rice noodle soup) and walked 30 steps over to the next restaurant and noticed the same dish sold for only 25 cents difference!
I think that best summarizes the state of the economy. It's a race to the bottom to see how low you can go.


I can't imagine that price differential says it all. I bet the restaurant that's full has better food.
Daphne64
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: middle of the USA
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby Falconoffury » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 02:31:50

Let's not forget that we have a vast amount of debt in the system now compared to previous recessions. The USA is also vastly more dependent on imports than ever before. We now depend on "credit" rather than real production to boost the economy. So many things have changed since the 70s, that it is difficult to extrapolate past data and use it to predict what will happen now.

All I can say for sure is that we have all the ingredients for an utter and devastating collapse of the entire financial system, and we are frighteningly close.

Bailouts will lead to a run on the dollar due to excessive inflation. A run on the dollar is probably the worst scenario because it will also mean an ending to a share of imports. Without imports, the USA will be in Mad Max land.

No bailouts will cause massive job loss, retirement savings losses, a majority of banks will fail in the country. Almost every business based upon credit will fail. On the up side, the dollar would strengthen. Foreigners would be more willing to help out the USA. We would be in a depression, but I don't think it would last as long as the Great Depression. If we can quickly destroy the credit-based economy, we can move all the faster to a more local, production-based economy.

I say, let the system crash. Get rid of the entire derivatives market. Destroy all the banks and businesses that were based upon the loose credit and loose monetary policy. Get rid of the federal reserve, and a bring back the greenback. Make not just a gold standard, but a resources standard, based on copper, aluminum, lumber, silicon, and other useful resources. Base money on real things. We can learn to save and recycle everything again. We can balance our trade between exports and imports. We can become what made us great 100 years ago. Sure we'll have a 3-5 year depression, but we'll be better in the end.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:10:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')
Doesn't that mean that Starbucks would go out of business, which would put downward pressure on all prices, since there would be thousands of young hip unemployed people with no money who would no longer be able to buy anything because they lost their jobs at Starbucks?

I don't know the answer to this issue, I'm just freestyling like the rest of us.


Starbucks merges with Tully's and Seattle's Best. The merger removes over 50% of coffee shops from market. Leaves many empty coffee shops in place, depresses commercial real estate. Commercial RE asset deflation.

At the same time coffee shops are closing, rotates panicky investors back into commodities, as they flee devalued fiat currencies, internationally, drives up price of coffee, as a commodity. Wages can't be cut, for employees, fewer people buying coffee, share price drops. This is happening across the retail sector. More money piles into commodities, including oil. Price for coffee and delivery of coffee jumps again. What to do? Close more coffee shops. Hits retail sector, commercial real estate. What to do? How does the investor respond? Sector rotation, into what? Bingo--Commodities. Price of coffee beans goes up....again.

Rinse repeat. Finally, "Star-tull-seat-best", the new conglomerate, a skeleton of it's former selves, decides to forgo market share and economies of scale, and focus on the upper 10% who still have money. A cup of coffee?... fifteen bucks. Think it can't happen? It certainly did, post Glasnost in Russia, and there are numerous, numerous examples of this kind of economic situation playing out, both historically and in the here and now, in different locales.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby Duende » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:23:00

threadbear wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') cup of coffee?... fifteen bucks.


I would think if this were the case, that there would be MANY fewer total stores then there are now.
"Where is the man who has so much as to be out of danger?" -Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Duende
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat 27 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: The District
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:30:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Duende', 't')hreadbear wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') cup of coffee?... fifteen bucks.


I would think if this were the case, that there would be MANY fewer total stores then there are now.


It hasn't happened yet. This is a future forecast. Think of it as the pendulum swinging very far in the other direction.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby Iaato » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:33:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')t's important to remember that hyperinflation is mostly a psychological phenomenon that employers have to buy into as well.


Hyperinflation is only as psychological as that "mental recession" that Phil Gramm accused us of having six months ago. Tex, you're basing your guess about our economic direction based on employer responses to political mandates. It is the political mandates from Congress that will drive things, and employers will only be able to react. As money gets pumped into the system, employers will have the choice of layoffs or increasing salaries. They will do both, but mostly the former.
“Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value ---- zero.” --Voltaire
User avatar
Iaato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1008
Joined: Mon 12 Mar 2007, 03:00:00
Location: As close as I can get to the beginning of the pipe.
Top

Re: Where will they get the money to fund a $700 billion che

Unread postby Duende » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:38:28

threadbear wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t hasn't happened yet. This is a future forecast. Think of it as the pendulum swinging very far in the other direction.


I figured you meant it as a future forecast. I did too - do you think in the future, if coffee is $15/cup that there would be fewer stores?

My suspicion is that, as the economy worsens, one of two things happens to each and every retail establishment:

1. raise prices to cover operating costs, or
2. shut down, because sales of goods at higher prices in that locale will not cover operating costs.

From this standpoint, I would imagine far fewer total Starbucks stores because in many parts of town, not enough people would buy coffee for $15/cup to cover the operating costs of staying in business.
"Where is the man who has so much as to be out of danger?" -Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Duende
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat 27 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: The District
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron