by threadbear » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:10:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')
Doesn't that mean that Starbucks would go out of business, which would put downward pressure on all prices, since there would be thousands of young hip unemployed people with no money who would no longer be able to buy anything because they lost their jobs at Starbucks?
I don't know the answer to this issue, I'm just freestyling like the rest of us.
Starbucks merges with Tully's and Seattle's Best. The merger removes over 50% of coffee shops from market. Leaves many empty coffee shops in place, depresses commercial real estate. Commercial RE asset deflation.
At the same time coffee shops are closing, rotates panicky investors back into commodities, as they flee devalued fiat currencies, internationally, drives up price of coffee, as a commodity. Wages can't be cut, for employees, fewer people buying coffee, share price drops. This is happening across the retail sector. More money piles into commodities, including oil. Price for coffee and delivery of coffee jumps again. What to do? Close more coffee shops. Hits retail sector, commercial real estate. What to do? How does the investor respond? Sector rotation, into what? Bingo--Commodities. Price of coffee beans goes up....again.
Rinse repeat. Finally, "Star-tull-seat-best", the new conglomerate, a skeleton of it's former selves, decides to forgo market share and economies of scale, and focus on the upper 10% who still have money. A cup of coffee?... fifteen bucks. Think it can't happen? It certainly did, post Glasnost in Russia, and there are numerous, numerous examples of this kind of economic situation playing out, both historically and in the here and now, in different locales.