by Doly » Fri 10 Dec 2021, 09:38:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')o you have a personal objection to folks having hobbies?
I do, when the "hobby" consists of collecting stuff specifically designed to kill, as opposed to some other things you mention, which aren't specifically designed to kill.
I have a hobby of learning about medicinal plants and mushrooms, and people find it distasteful when I describe the various poisons I know, in spite that I do not extract or collect poisons. I would find it understandable, if I did extract and collect poisons, that my neighbours would feel some objections to the activity, and maybe demand that I offer some sort of guarantees designed to stop me and others from murdering people willy-nilly, just because it's possible. Such as, for example, clearly labelling the jars as deadly poisons, and publicly stating that I would take the utmost care not to poison anyone, accidentally or otherwise.
Do you gun owners ever have any sort of ceremony where you publicly state that you clearly understand the consequences of shooting people and will do all you can to avoid it? I don't think so. Why not? Oh, because it might give someone cold feet to even describe the reality of your "hobby", and that's bad for the business of some people.
If your "hobby" is training to kill, you better get real about what your "hobby" is and who that makes you. Hopefully you are training to kill animals, not people, and you are training to be a hunter, not a soldier. But if you are training to harm people, then you should not ask or expect any mercy, least of all in words, since you are training not to be merciful. You call your activity a "hobby", and that's asking for mercy. I call it sheer un-mitigated irresponsibility, when you are not even able to admit, perhaps not even to yourself, if you are planning to possibly harm people or not.