by Alcassin » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 23:03:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', '
')Right, so you'll readily agree with me we have enough nuclear fuel to last industrial civilization millions of years.
Well, if you had Chernobyl not far away you might be quite aware of the possible outcomes. It's not so far away from here, and really, assuring me that this is safe is calling 'Titanic' unsinkable.
Anyway, I think it can be used as a minor energy source but we have to powerdown. So I disagree, and moreover - keep consumption of uranium growing and your grandkids will face the same problem we have with oil today.
It's not a solution, it's merely transition.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Duende', '
')I actually heard Richard Heinberg discuss the term "infrastructural determinist", which is an accurate term in that it addresses the fact that our lifestyles and ideas are ultimately founded upon the seemingly natural expectation that resources are infinitely available to us.
Infrastructural determinist or wider - economic or even ecologic determinist is quite good term but it won't make any career, it's complicated.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'I') just noticed the article by Kurt Cobb who writes about Peak Oil all the time.