by mercurygirl » Fri 03 Oct 2008, 14:15:39
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')sked which is a greater threat, a nuclear Pakistan or a nuclear Iran, Palin seemed to be stalling, or writing a term paper, when she said: “An armed, nuclear armed especially Iran is so extremely dangerous to consider.”
Biden was crisper, with a dose of realism: “Iran getting a nuclear weapon would be very, very destabilizing. They are more than — they are not close to getting a nuclear weapon that's able to be deployed.”
Biden relentlessly and clearly delivered a specific message he had been assigned to hammer home: McCain-Palin would be four more years of Bush-Cheney. Biden mentioned President Bush more than a dozen times.
"Look, past is prologue, Gwen," he said at one point. "The issue is, how different is John McCain's policy going to be than George Bush's? I haven't heard anything yet."
By contrast, Palin was in much more of a survival mode, barely delivering on her advisers' hopes that she would be aggressive with Biden, throwing gaffes and policies back at him. For the Alaska governor, it was policy as a second language — adequate but not enlightening.
The consensus seems to be that she didn't make any major mistakes (unless you consider vague, ideological generalities mistakes), but it was not a stellar performance. She lost in that she did not differentiate John McCain from Bush, all the "mavericks" notwithstanding.
Yeah, Dude. Some of us are aware that this is about the "look" and "style" of You-Know-Who.