by basil_hayden » Tue 01 Nov 2011, 16:43:00
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('basil_hayden', 'N')ah, it's all the trucks delivering stuff to North Dakota wellheads and trucking the oil back to distribution facilities.
37 trucks of stuff per wellhead, plus frack water (~1 million gallons per frack at about 6 thousand gallons per trip) then trucking the crude to the railroads, which also run on distillate. I'Il bet that alone could account for increased distillate demand,and the hokey GDP increases lately.
Though you might have been a bit facetious, that's actually an interesting observation.
The rise on that chart *does* coincide with the big surge in US oil production I've been noting
here. It also roughly coincides with the Gallup poll's dramatic fall in the unemployment rate. Maybe we should wait until Friday's jobs report to see if there was a big increase in employment of truck drivers.
Even if a surge in truck drivers transporting stuff for the Bakken and Eagleford has accounted for some of the increase, I doubt it would be responsible for all of it, or even most of it. But I wouldn't be surprised if it accounts for *some* of it. We'll also have to wait a few months when ND and Texas publish their oil production figures for October.
Facetious? Not one bit - look at the numbers of trucks per well.
and 250,000 barrels a day out of the ND via truck to railroad cars (the other 250,000 via pipeline)
This alone could explain upward GDP and economic activity while the rest of the USA sinks further in the pit.
AntiDoomer is the dreamer, not I; I gots facts! That's Anti's main problem - no facts, just sunshine, lollipops and unicorns.
In fact, diesel is in such high demand in the Williston Basin that it costs as much as it does in my puny wicked expensive state of Connecticut (over $3.80 per gallon).