by JMB » Thu 01 Mar 2007, 23:46:21
Don’t forget Hubbert. I would call it the Hubbert-Deffeyes prediction. Remember, Deffeyes took over where Hubbert left off, and fine-tuned his prediction based on more complete data. And don’t leave out Jeffrey Johnson, Ron Patterson, and Khebab over at TOD, and they‘ve done some fine work. They’ve also called the peak and deserve mention. BTW, James Kunstler is also being vindicated right about now.
Cobra wrote: “....production will have needed to fall throughout the summer season for any real indication.” I don’t agree…at all. Look back at Deffeyes’ prediction of Feb 11, 2006. What exactly did he predict? Feb 11 wasn’t a prediction, it was a confirmation. He noted that world cumulative production reached 50% (50% Qt) on December 16, 2005, and that, he said, is the peak date of world oil production on the logistic curve. There are two “curves” here -- the bell shaped logistic curve -- and the graph made by production data. We shouldn’t confuse them. Deffeyes’ prediction is only for the log curve. He didn’t say much about actual monthly production data. Only that the production data will closely, (or roughly,
depending on how closely you look at it) follow the smooth bell-curve. Remember, this bell-curve extends out over about 200 years. Production ups and downs about right now don’t mean a whole lot, and a slight uptrend would not disprove Deffeyes’ prediction. I can’t presume to speak for Deffeyes of course but I think that summarizes his prediction, and stand to be corrected if I’m proved wrong.
IMO, equal weight can’t be given to all the oil “gurus“, including ASPO. Hubbert was uncommonly astute. If it wasn’t for Hubbert we would not likely even be discussing the things we are now. We might, about now be asking -- what’s up with this oil? Think something’s happening?
Are we at peak? There is no doubt. Zero. The Hubbert-Deffeyes case is way too solid. December 16, 2005 was the peak. (Once again… that’s on the smooth curve…not on monthly production figures)