by Plantagenet » Fri 05 Apr 2013, 16:18:01
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'a')s the president’s dealing with the energy industry we don’t really have a lot to complain about. Not approving the Keystone Pipeline border crossing permit is just PR for his liberal base IMHO.
I agree completely. In fact, I expect Obama to approve the Keystone XL pipeline sometime this summer.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', '.').. during President Obama’s watch more Canadian oil was exported to the US in 2012 than ever before in history.
And that’s not all. In the last 12 months he’s offered 1 million acres of fed offshore leases for bid. Just since the Macondo blow out and one of the worse oil spills in history he has approved over 400 new offshore drill permits with many in the same Deep Water trend. He has also given a green light 14 major offshore oil production facilities in the Gulf of Mexico. He also recently permitted Shell Oil’s rather embarrassing efforts in the Arctic Ocean. And closer to home for me, just two years ago his EPA approved the last Clean Air permit that would allow the construction of the White Stallion coal-fired power plant in Texas...ironically planned to be built on top of a NG field I’m developing. A plant that would be fed with coal railed half way across the country from Illinois for the next 30 years. He’s also approved the export of LNG from Texas to England. If we can export a lot more maybe I’ll be able to charge American consumers more in time. He’s done nothing to hinder the export of coal from the US to other countries. He’s done nothing to hinder initial efforts to develop oil sands in Utah (which don’t appear to have nearly as much potential as the Canadian oil sands). He hasn’t even discussed the prospect of raising motor fuel taxes let alone putting forth a recommendation to do so. The refiners love him for that. No effort to impose an “excess profits” tax on the oil patch as previous administrations had threatened at one time. He’s talked about changing tax laws that benefit the oil patch but nothing has changed yet.
I agree completely. In fact, the US oil patch is one of the brightest spots in the US economy in terms of job creation. The unemployment rate and GDP growth would be hurting even more without the energy jobs.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'I')f we had an R as president today how much better could things be for the oil patch? One might argue that an R president might not have been as accommodating to the oil patch for fear of driving the middle to the left a tad.