Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE US Trade Gap Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Unread postby shortonoil » Tue 12 Apr 2005, 12:18:09

It appears that we are going to run out of money before we run out of oil. The fact that the debt is growing faster then the GDP is not surpassing. The cost of oil is increasing faster than the increase in productivity and production efficiency. What is truly being reflected in the recent numbers is that we are being to see the affects of the increased replacement cost of our, as yet, undepreciated assets. Where as we have been watching the effects on transpiration fuels as a result of increasing protoleum costs we have ignored the affect of the unstated increase cost of replacing depreciated assets. The world, not just the US, is in for a very unstable economic experience. An economic system based on growth backed by debt is just not possible in a world of continually increasing oil prices. It is even less possible in a world of decreasing oil supply.


In the future, the currency of wealth, will be knowledge
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA

Unread postby zceb90 » Tue 12 Apr 2005, 12:41:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '.')...The world, not just the US, is in for a very unstable economic experience. An economic system based on growth backed by debt is just not possible in a world of continually increasing oil prices. It is even less possible in a world of decreasing oil supply.


It's worse than that, we are going to have rising oil prices and decreasing oil supply at the same time, at least until sufficient recession / depression is triggered to destroy enough demand to bring it back in line with supply. Even that won't be enough as year on year declines will continually reduce available supplies. IMO recession leading to depression will be one of the first events to occur following peaking; it's Nature's initial way of commencing the adjustment process in the absence of action by politicians.
User avatar
zceb90
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon 12 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

Unread postby shortonoil » Tue 12 Apr 2005, 13:03:45

zceb90 wrote:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's worse than that, we are going to have rising oil prices and decreasing oil supply at the same time, at least until sufficient recession / depression is triggered to destroy enough demand to bring it back in line with supply.


True, but we can not have growth without an increasing oil supply. Without growth our present financial/monetary system can't continue. The question is then, how long before we dump our present financial/monetary system. Will the power elite let the populous starve to maintain their dominate position? I think it is quite likely that they will. Is this what you call "living in interesting times"?
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA

Unread postby nth » Tue 12 Apr 2005, 13:27:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', 'H')owever they can not print enough money since the inflationary effects of prior money supply expansion has pushed up commodity prices throughout the world.


Ah. You nailed it. Inflation or monetary crisis will be facing all the fcbs. Let's see how creative they are.

US has been lucky, but other countries who screw up and printed too much money often resort to starting over. This has happen quite a lot in other countries, so well documented and researched. I wonder if US and EU have planned contigencies for starting over.

Just in case, anyone don't know what I am talking about. I am saying US saying it will no longer honor USD. US will print new money call it New USD- NUSD for short. US will set an exchange rate of 10 old USD for 1 NUSD and put a time limit or set quotas or set rationing... like $1m per year per person for next 10 years. They can be as creative as they want.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby nth » Tue 12 Apr 2005, 13:49:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '
')True, but we can not have growth without an increasing oil supply.


Well, I think there is a group of economists who believed that oil economy will end sometimes and growth will continue. So to accommodate their views, maybe you can exchange oil supply to energy production.

We can not have growth without increasing energy production.

I think for a few decades we can increase our energy if we destroy our environment by exploiting everything.

So hard to avoid the world economy is going to end scenario.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby linlithgowoil » Tue 12 Apr 2005, 16:05:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')ust a thought...Like a person who is about to file bankruptcy will go max out their credit cards


this is my plan in september when my 2 year training contract runs out. :-D
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland
Top

Unread postby shortonoil » Tue 12 Apr 2005, 19:32:35

nth wrote:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ell, I think there is a group of economists who believed that oil economy will end sometimes and growth will continue. So to accommodate their views, maybe you can exchange oil supply to energy production.


Just because some economist believes in the Tooth Fairy, doesn’t mean that I would go knocking my teeth out to collect. The problem with many economist is that they don’t seem to realize that oil creates money, not the other way around. They brood over their P/Q curves and don’t realize that their theories only work if there is a substitute for the commodity being considered. Their curve has a discontinuity in it because oil, for the short term anyway, is irreplaceable.
Petroleum now supplies 40% of the worlds’ energy needs. There does not appear to be any immediate replacement for its high energy content, easy processing and ease of transport. Due to depletion, even the most stringent economizing may not be able to match the expected decline rate in production.
Since oil is the bases of our technological culture its increased scarcity will reflect throughout the society. If decline from depletion occurs faster than demand can be reduced by price, the price will continue to increase until things catastrophically collapse.


"In the future, the currency of wealth will be knowledge"
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

$61 Billion

Unread postby BigBear » Tue 12 Apr 2005, 21:14:41

Very well put " shortonoil" --there is no replacement for oil--just as there is no replacement for proper fiscal policies--economist are giving us neither.
What is more desirable than something so rare
User avatar
BigBear
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri 11 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby frankthetank » Tue 12 Apr 2005, 22:34:25

Except in the 70's oil was only peaking in the US, not the world, like it is right now...
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Unread postby ShawnAvery » Wed 13 Apr 2005, 00:22:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', 'I')'m as big a contrarian as anyone ... but I've been hearing this for some 15+ years.

If there was any doubt about the US system it would show up in the interest rates. Consider it just like oil ... in the 1970's we had wage-price freezes, the 55 mph speed limit and mandated 68 degree thermostats ... you will see all of that and more long before you EVER seen serious problems from PO.

LIKEWISE you will also see double digit interest rates before you EVER see any serious financial problems in regards to the USA financial system. In the 1970's the prime interest rate was 14-15 percent and mortgages at 20+ percent. With 4 percent treasuries and 6 percent mortgages, I dont think we are ANYWHERE near the financial collapse predicted here and elsewhere ad nauseum.

It's coming of course, but by the time it gets here it will be obvious to everyone.


thats simply not true nowadays. the economy and housing market are simply too exposed to be able to handle such massive interest rates without millions of people defaulting on their mortgages.

our economy is based on marketing, marketing is not based on reality, and the people who gave these people this massive amount of credit are responsible for keeping the interest rates low... not because it was wrong to lie to them to trick them into thinking a variable rate mortgage is free money, but since they got SO MANY PEOPLE to buy into their little game that if interest rates went into the double digits these guys would have to worry about getting lynched.

wherein lies our lost chance in being able to deal with peak oil. for the past 25 years the american people have been marketed overconsumption as an american way of life. they wont give it up without a fight.

you cant tell a mob the same thing for 25 years then all of a sudden say something completely opposite without there being a whole lot of violence.

nuff said.
"It's a lot easier to get someone who's never been burnt to jump in the fire.." -me
User avatar
ShawnAvery
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: arizona
Top

Unread postby tokyo_to_motueka » Wed 13 Apr 2005, 04:13:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', 'I')t's coming of course, but by the time it gets here it will be obvious to everyone.

so everyone saw the 1929 crash coming?

when it comes, the crash will be sudden and most people will be totally taken by surprise, exposed to the market.
User avatar
tokyo_to_motueka
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tochigi
Top

Unread postby Doly » Wed 13 Apr 2005, 04:39:39

Why will it be sudden? Any economic reasoning supporting the sudden scenario as opposed to the gradual one?
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby Mercani » Wed 13 Apr 2005, 04:52:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '
')
Why will it be sudden? Any economic reasoning supporting the sudden scenario as opposed to the gradual one?



Because people panic when things really start to go bad. It's like an avalanche. It starts small but gets very big in a short time.

Just assume that 1% of population lose their trust in the banking system for some reason (e.g. too many mortgage defaults) and decide to withdraw their money and hold hard cash. The remaining will rush to the banks to save their money. Because thanks to fractional reserve banking, banks cannot pay back all the deposits. Nearly everyone in debt would default on their debt.

I don't think FED even cannot print money fast enough to overcome such a rush. Maybe they would print $10000 banknotes. :)

In this case probably there would be a banking holiday: Banks closed until further announcement. That's what happened in 1929.
User avatar
Mercani
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri 18 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby jato » Wed 13 Apr 2005, 05:04:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'w')hen it comes, the crash will be sudden and most people will be totally taken by surprise, exposed to the market.


I agree with your statement. Most people (even those in power) are H.U.A. (Head Up A$$) when it comes to the big picture.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f there was any doubt about the US system it would show up in the interest rates. Consider it just like oil ... in the 1970's we had wage-price freezes, the 55 mph speed limit and mandated 68 degree thermostats ... you will see all of that and more long before you EVER seen serious problems from PO.


I would expect to see these items being implemented right now. Instead, our "leadership" talks about drilling in ANWR (a drop in the bucket as we all know here). We are in strange and very different times when compared with the 1970s.

I have read that Congress is currently working on an "energy bill". It will be interesting to see if it favors the production side or the consumption side of the equation.

I am getting the strange sense that we, the US middle class, are about to be run right into the ground (economically speaking). As Monte has said, "the train that we are all riding is heading for a cliff and our leadership is pouring on more steam!" We should be putting on the brakes even if it hurts some of the passengers!

Some "Leaders" of the past have stolen from, enslaved and slaughtered people! What makes anyone think that the United States middle class is protected from greedy men?

I can already hear their words after the crash as they sit in their compounds: "Those poor fools (the middle class) didn't save up for a rainy day! Instead they borrowed money and spent their way into poverty! Now they are starving to death! Tisk Tisk… what a tragedy. Pass the Grey Poupon!"
jato
 
Top

Unread postby RiverRat » Wed 13 Apr 2005, 13:09:31

The US society is highly leveraged in a financial sense. In a steadily rising economy this is advantageous. In a recessionary economy this is potentially disastrous.

With the US saving rate at an abysmal 0.2%, slow wage rate increases, low equity stakes in real estate and high health care costs, a little ‘hiccup’ at the top of the economy can quickly ripple downwards.

The majority of savings are tied up in 401k’s and IRA’s. These savings will be exposed to a recessionary environment and further eroded with a stiff tax penalty for early withdraws (if one decides to use these funds to support everyday life).

When one is extremely leveraged and highly exposed to the markets … this is a ‘bad mix’.
If ...'If's' and 'But's' ... were Candy and Nuts ... we would all be happy and fat !
RiverRat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Trade gap falls unexpectedly

Unread postby Leanan » Wed 11 May 2005, 09:32:03

Stocks are likely to head higher on this news:

http://money.cnn.com/2005/05/11/news/ec ... /index.htm

A smaller trade deficit is good for the U.S. economy, but I wonder if this is a sign of pain ahead. The reason for the drop was sharply lower imports, despite a 20% rise in the value of energy imports. Sounds to me like companies and their customers are cutting back, either because they can't afford to buy as much as usual, or because they're worried about the future and trying to save money.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby frankthetank » Wed 11 May 2005, 09:45:51

I thought much the same as you. Its down to about 55bil vs 60bil ... A good thing is that exports are up (probably due to the weakened dollar), which is good for workers here.

I wonder if China revalues what these numbers will do? It would be awesome if America could become a manafacturer of quality products again.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Unread postby linlithgowoil » Wed 11 May 2005, 09:48:25

it might be like what is happening in the UK - a slowdown/reverse in consumer spending. and most of our stuff in the UK is also made up of imports.

yes - this will probably be a temporary boost to the stocks (maybe?), but it does seem to indicate a slowdown in demand for imported goods which isnt good for the whole world.

are we seeing the first signs of the global downturn now?
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland

Unread postby Pops » Wed 11 May 2005, 09:50:37

Wow that is surprising – especially the narrowing with China!

Wonder how China-Mart is doing?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Unread postby MagnoliaFan » Wed 11 May 2005, 11:48:21

Something had to give, eventually. This is a sure sign that the purchasing power of the average American has decreased significantly. The imports decreased a lot more than the rise in exports for the US.

The countries which have benefitted from the US trade deficit will have less acess to capital. Less capital, means less jobs.

India will see it's dotcom industry crash just as it did in the US in 2000. They are churning out 50,000 "engineering" graduates every year, with an ever-shrinking pie of outsourcing jobs, they will soon feel just like the US high-tech workers feel right now. What countries offer high-tech workers at a cheaper rate than India's?
User avatar
MagnoliaFan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron