Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE TARP Thread (merged)

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Tucked deep inside TARP...no reserve requirement for ban

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Sat 04 Oct 2008, 00:36:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', '
')
This is a strange time we live in. If you can borrow money for a wild idea to make a quick buck, you could potentially become rich while this lasts. Banks have unlimited cash to lend for it for the time being.


My WAG is that this is not for lending to people with wild ideas. Its to keep the Visa Card system working while they figure out what to do with all the credit card debt.

Which means for a while at least if you still have good credit and don't make it too obvious, you can keep charging up the card.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Tucked deep inside TARP...no reserve requirement for ban

Unread postby TheDude » Sat 04 Oct 2008, 01:20:09

Well that's evil.

Tip of the Hat to ya, Hank.

Image

Hasn't shown up in any news items yet.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o there it is, banks no longer have to keep even a small amount of peoples bank accounts available as cash. They don’t have to fail, they can just say they are out of cash today. Your money is still there, FDIC does not kick in, but they just stop giving out money.


? "Failure" still means what it always has, right? Or is he foreseeing banks entering Japan style zombie mode?

Don't have time at the moment to read the whole TF thread. Thanks for posting this Rocc.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Tucked deep inside TARP...no reserve requirement for ban

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Sat 04 Oct 2008, 01:50:03

They were dancing pretty close to 0% already, weren't they?
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Tucked deep inside TARP...no reserve requirement for ban

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Sat 04 Oct 2008, 02:01:52

They've been running negative un-borrowed reserves for nearly a year now. The only thing they've had in the vault is a pile of IOUs to the Fed.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

TARP Allows Treasury to Purchase Retirement Plans, MMFs!

Unread postby DantesPeak » Mon 06 Oct 2008, 20:18:12

I came upon this myself after reviewing the recently passed TARP bill (TROUBLED ASSETS RELIEF PROGRAM). I am somewhat surprised that I haven't seen word about this anywhere else, but check this out:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')EC. 103. CONSIDERATIONS. (8) protecting the retirement security of Americans by purchasing troubled assets held by or on behalf of an eligible retirement plan described in clause

(iii), (iv), (v), or (vi) of section 402(c)(8)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, except that such authority shall not extend to any compensation arrangements subject to section 409A of such Code; and (9) the utility of purchasing other real estate owned and instruments backed by mortgages on multifamily properties.


Ask Sam Section 402(c)(8)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code says this, which basically defines all private and some public retirement plans:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')8) Definitions For purposes of this subsection—
(B) Eligible retirement plan The term “eligible retirement plan” means—
(i) an individual retirement account described in section 408 (a),
(ii) an individual retirement annuity described in section 408 (b) (other than an endowment contract),
(iii) a qualified trust,
(iv) an annuity plan described in section 403 (a),
(v) an eligible deferred compensation plan described in section 457 (b) which is maintained by an eligible employer described in section 457 (e)(1)(A), and
(vi) an annuity contract described in section 403 (b).


Cornell Law

So the Treasury is now allowed to buy the assets of everyone's retirement plans. But wait, there's more: TARP also allows the Treasury to take on all the capital losses any money market fund, if that fund is insured in the new Treasury program:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')EC. 131. EXCHANGE STABILIZATION FUND REIMBURSEMENT.

(a) REIMBURSEMENT. -- The Secretary shall reimburse the Exchange Stabilization Fund established under section 5302 of title 31, United States Code, for any funds used for the temporary guaranty program for the United States money market mutual fund industry, from funds under this Act.


Ask Sam

So in sum, the Treasury can buy all the assets in all private retirement plans, and will give full face value to any money market fund!
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 15 Apr 2009, 15:44:25, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE TARP Thread.
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: TARP Allows Treasury to Purchase Retirement Plans, MMFs!

Unread postby TreeFarmer » Mon 06 Oct 2008, 20:32:33

Apparently if your retirement money is in these types of funds it is safe. I bet the politicians have to protect retirement money or face not getting re-elected.

On the other hand, if you own stock in one of these companies it is probably worthless.

TF
User avatar
TreeFarmer
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

TARP

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 19:23:11

This gem was tucked into the third paragraph of a Bloomberg article: "The S&P 500 Financials Index slid to a 12-year low as the Treasury scrapped plans to buy mortgage assets and shifted focus to consumer credit." Bloomberg
I'm sorry. Say what? Wasn't the economy supposed to collapse if we don't buy $750 billion in mortgage backed derivatives? Grocery stores were all going to close. Martial law was going to be imposed. Now we've completely scrapped it just like that? Am I missing something here? Somebody clue me in.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 15 Apr 2009, 15:43:10, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE TARP Thread.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: TARP

Unread postby hironegro » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 19:31:25

Because Americans are irrational and fat!
hironegro
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue 08 Apr 2008, 03:00:00

Re: TARP

Unread postby Kristjan » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 19:38:24

Paulson and The Treasury decided they no longer want to buy the troubled assets but were going for stakes in the troubled enterprises.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')aulson said the government's $700 billion financial rescue package won't purchase troubled assets from banks as originally planned. He said that plan would have taken too much time, and that the Treasury instead will rely on buying stakes in banks and encouraging them to resume more normal lending.

here

This is actually a step forward since buying up the bad debt is slow and costly. Buy a stake in the banks also insures that the government will get its money back by selling its stake later down the line. I could tell you more about it, but I'm afraid I'm way too tired right now. Off to bed. (It's 1:38 AM here)
User avatar
Kristjan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon 10 Nov 2008, 04:00:00
Location: EU
Top

Re: TARP

Unread postby RSFB » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 19:38:46

Allow me to play devil's advocate here. What the Fed is doing is essentially giving money to the banks. Isn't that as good or better than buying their junk assets?

If the banks are well capitalized, their balance sheets won't look as bad which is the same effect as buying junk from them would have.
User avatar
RSFB
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 309
Joined: Sun 03 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: TARP

Unread postby the48thronin » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 20:00:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')his gem was tucked into the third paragraph of a Bloomberg article: "The S&P 500 Financials Index slid to a 12-year low as the Treasury scrapped plans to buy mortgage assets and shifted focus to consumer credit." Bloomberg

I'm sorry. Say what? Wasn't the economy supposed to collapse if we don't buy $750 billion in mortgage backed derivatives? Grocery stores were all going to close. Martial law was going to be imposed. Now we've completely scrapped it just like that?

Am I missing something here? Somebody clue me in.


Welcome to the brave new world... the shift to "consumer debt" is because they admitted the bank bail out was NOT working.

Saturday... maybe it will be a holiday in the new world order calender...LOL
Malthusian Riders Member!

Courtesy and Courage Sincerity and Self-control Honor and Loyalty a Code to Live By!
What do the miners do when the canary dies? EVACUATE THE MINE not argue about the color of it's feathers or buy a parrot instead.

Where is my pitchfork and torch? I need them for a visit to the castle!
User avatar
the48thronin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri 30 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: On the highway, or the water somewhere!
Top

Re: TARP

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 20:01:16

Ya know.. when this bill was being pushed through, I recall hearing how it was written so that Paulson could in practice do whatever he wants with the money, change plans on a dime, whatever.

TARP stands for Troubled Asset Recovery Program.. so now the money isn't going to be used for troubled assets at all. Mmkay.

I feel like we're in Ancient Rome, where a Dictator has been appointed to do as he pleases.. in this case, Treasury and the Fed.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: TARP

Unread postby heroineworshipper » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 21:10:39

Serves U right for voting for a bigger government in 2004. Now forget about the $700 billion & focus on the new $1.4 trillion ice cream relief plan, soon to be renamed the "heroineworshipper retirement plan" as soon as you pass it.
People first, then things, then dollars.
There will be enslavement, cannibalism, & zombie invasions.
User avatar
heroineworshipper
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 890
Joined: Fri 14 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Calif*

Ohio public school district seeks $100 mil from TARP

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 03 Dec 2008, 02:31:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')LEVELAND: A financially ailing Ohio school district has joined the ranks of banks and automakers clamoring for a portion of the $700 billion economic bailout package. Olmsted Falls Superintendent Todd Hoadley said Tuesday that if automakers and cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta and Phoenix can ask for TARP money, schools should be able to follow suit.

"I feel a moral obligation to our taxpayers to make this attempt," said Hoadley, who requested $100 million from the Treasury department last week. "This is a legitimate request. I'll be frankly disappointed if something positive doesn't come out of this."The district has buckled under rising enrollment and strained finances, with some schools forced to convert maintenance closets into classrooms.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has said the Troubled Asset Relief Program, known as TARP, was meant to stabilize financial institutions. Paulson told Hoadley the same thing when the district submitted the request directly to him last week.

The request was also sent to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

http://www.ohio.com/news/break_news/35394239.html
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 15 Apr 2009, 15:42:04, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE TARP Thread.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Ohio public school district seeks $100 mil from TARP

Unread postby seldom_seen » Wed 03 Dec 2008, 02:42:17

Their best bet would be to do what Goldman Sachs and American Express did and become a commercial bank. Then the gettin' gets good.

First Bank of Ohio Public Shool District?

Federal Bank of Seldom Seen?

Get some!
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Ohio public school district seeks $100 mil from TARP

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Wed 03 Dec 2008, 03:44:31

With every Industry, City and State currently underwater due to the inability to raise any money on the credit markets, obviously every Tom, Dick and Harry is lining up at the Federal Trough for a Bailout now. Our friends in Ohio are just the first ones to ask for some of the Billions besides the Banks and the Automakers. Of course the Banks MUST be saved, not Schools! Much more important that AIG Executives are Retained with Christmas Bonuses then keeping the schools open. LOL.

Seriously, once this bankruptcy is finished the bottom line here is that EVERYTHING is going to be Nationalized, we are becoming a Socialist State by default. LITERALLY by default. In order to keep from devolving into complete anarchy, each of the systems that runs a society as large as this one has to be reorganized, in order of priority.

Priority #1 is obviously Food Production and Distribution. This is almost certainly the first system to go off the grid of general commerce as the monetary system fails. By next year, I would expect some internal system of food credits and energy credits for food producers to be put in place, to make sure crops get planted and the food production apparatus doesn't grind to a complete halt immediately. This will result in shortages by next year, but I don't think starvation in this country in the next year, except in some pockets of poverty.

Priority #2 is actually Child Care and Education. Unless you have someplace to warehouse the kids until they are old enough to work, you cannot free up their parents to become laborers in whatever make work program you devise, whether it is rebuilding infrastructure, building windmills or moving people back into rural areas to become farm laborers instead of Starbucks Barristas.

So, in actuality, School systems will in some way be brought off the general economy (for as long as it lasts) and socialized separately, possibly using the same Credits program that will be instituted for food production and distribution.

If some type of internal USA economy that focuses around the basics of life gets put in place, it could slow the spin down here, and we would not face immediate starvation, just shortages and hardship. Rebuilding an economy based on some type of industry and trade with others would come only after we stabilize the internal needs of subsistence. Whether our Goobermint is capable of this or not remains an open question. If they are not, we would devolve down very quickly into anarchy.

If the Federal Goobermint does not get its act together quick enough, it will fall to the States to try to do this, and then if they fail each individual community will have to do it. In my head, I plan for what we might do in our community to cover Priorities #1 and #2 without any assistance from either the Federal Goobermint or the State. I'm hopeful that it doesn't devolve down to that level too fast, but if it does, I have a Plan in my head I think can work. If it gets bad enough, I will talk to my friends about it, and we will see if they are ready to listen then. Only time will tell.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Ohio public school district seeks $100 mil from TARP

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 03 Dec 2008, 05:12:24

ReverseEngineer
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')riority #1 is obviously Food Production and Distribution.


I agree. I certainly hope the government gets credit to the farmers. This seems to be an obvious necessity, but I wouldn't be surprised if they drag their feet -- they seem to only want to bail out "bank holding companies."
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Ohio public school district seeks $100 mil from TARP

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Wed 03 Dec 2008, 13:13:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '.')..the bottom line here is that EVERYTHING is going to be Nationalized, we are becoming a Socialist State by default. LITERALLY by default.


That's what governments do. It is their nature.

To expect otherwise is irrational.

Hoping Fed.gov will start acting contrary to the nature of governments is like expecting the K.K.K. to start promoting racial integration and recruiting blacks to join. It's nonsense.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles
Top

Re: Ohio public school district seeks $100 mil from TARP

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 03 Dec 2008, 16:03:30

Let's talk about how they got into this mess in the first place.

They were not totally stupid. They realized that their school system had grown, their existing stuff was on the old side, and they would have to spend some money to put kids into classrooms and fix up what they had.

So, they had two choices: go to the public, and ask them for more money, or take the cowards way out and rely on borrowing to do the job.

So, being elected officials, there was only one clear choice. Borrowing. The community was growing for awhile, so they figured that it would be no problem to float some loans, and they would pay it back later with an expanded tax base.... all of these new homes in the area.. more tax revenue, no brainer.

Except, of course, that the growth dried up.

So the problem, PO viewers, was that they expected the future to be like the past.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Ohio public school district seeks $100 mil from TARP

Unread postby Jotapay » Wed 03 Dec 2008, 18:31:40

Does Paulie have a tit for me to suckle on too? I'm a good 'merikun and want my bailout too.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron