by EnergyUnlimited » Wed 14 Jun 2006, 13:22:15
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('grabby', 'M')utations are almost always bad in the last 2000 years all observable mutations have damaged and limited the organism.
It is a false premise that says mutations are good, it is non scientific an undemonstrable.
If you have 2 million line code in windows and you randomly go in and change ONE BYTE ANYWHERE
it will far more likely to be bad good.
you will not get a new subroutine that calculates pi.
you will get a subroutine that crashes.
so with humans
the mutation to improve humans is false.
2. Radiation in deep space is deadly. cosmic rays are plentiful
yo would not survive to the stars.
Lead in space? that oughta be good for acceleration.
you C CANNOT GO TO THE STARS ON FUSION!
It is a mathematical impossibility.
antimatter is the only option and you wont see it in our era.
ergo after peak there is no more star attempts.
with reactive engines? (shooting matter or light out the back)
with a nice heavy ship youll go no where.
those who think we are going to the stars are wrong.1. we are not going to the stars.
2. Harry putter is not real
3. Star trek is a fantasy designed to sell gillete shaving blades.
wake up your about to run out of il.
going to space will save nothing.
3. Food mutations are never good. When the astronauts came back from the moon they isolated them for 2weeks and sterilized them so no plant mutation would WIPE OUT THE PlANET FOOD CHAIN they undserstood.
now that moonsanta is randomly mutating AND PLANTING plants without knowing what will happen this is GOOD?
mankind has a high likelihood of neutralizing our food supply and killing us.
1. If no mutations are good, evolution is dead. I do not observe it.
2. Life is not a Windows software (thankfully). Most of mutations are close to be neutral to survivability in fact.
3. "the mutation to improve humans is false"
Sounds illogical.
4. "Radiation in deep space is deadly."
Water also is deadly if it get to your lungs.
"Cosmic rays are plentiful"
So what, those are usually charged particles and can be deflected by magnetic field generated by the spacecraft.
Solved.
5. "You C CANNOT GO TO SPACE ON FUSION
it is a mathematical impossibility".
False.
You can. You can even go on chemical fuel (as few probes sent in seventhies actually do!).
It is only important how much TIME you want to spare.
One way travel to nearby stars (4-6 light years away) with 10-20% of speed of light is perfectly possible with fusion. This speed would allow to complete travel within single generation.
6. "Antimatter is the only option..."
False. There are many energetic transformations which are able to allow to produce sufficient energy to achieve this.
Fusion is one of them, atomic size black hole fed with ordinary matter is another one. They are many more.
7. "...we are not going to stars"
Who told you that?
8. "Harry putter is not real"
Neither Harry Potter is.
9. "going to space will save nothing"
There is not much to be saved anyway.
What the point to save? Carry on spending.
10. "Food mutations are never good..."
Who told you that?
11. "When the astronauts came back from the moon they isolated them for 2weeks and sterilized them so no plant mutation would WIPE OUT THE PlANET FOOD CHAIN they undserstood."
Silly PR exercise.
Mutations around Chernobyl do not appear to wipe out our food chain.
12. "now that moonsanta is randomly mutating AND PLANTING plants without knowing what will happen this is GOOD?
mankind has a high likelihood of neutralizing our food supply and killing us."
Not randomly really.
What the odds do you give for this to wipe us out?
My estimation is in range 0.000001% or so.
Food mutate anyway by natural course of events.
Otherwise you would eat carbonian ferns.