by EnergyUnlimited » Fri 16 Jun 2006, 18:22:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('grabby', '
')but since the FUSION TORCH ENGINE is about 20 times less efficient than antimatter.
The same motor in a fusion rocket with ONE PERSON ON BOARD reaching 10% C
woudl take 760 million tons of hydrogen deuterium tritium.
Now, it is only
70,541,997,720,000 miles to alpha ceti
(12 light years away)
False.
1. You are assuming that all fusion fuel must be taken on board of spacecraft before travel begin.
This fuel can also be gathered from interstellar space, while travel proggress.
Look in Google for interstellar ramjet proposed by R.W. Bussard in 1960.
The idea is, that interstellar protons would be scooped by funnell shaped magnetic field (or electrostatic one) generated by mooving craft, compressed into combustion camber and burned in fusion process, than exhaust gas ejected on the back of craft producing acceleration (for example 1g during 1-2-3-how much you want years).
Here you have fuel for free. And you may go (in theory at least) as close to c as you wish. The FASTER you go, the BETTER it works.
The same mechanism would decelerate craft, while destination is approached.
There are many practical problems (say fusion process of hydrogen to hellium would have to be developed, very large magnetic fields generated and many, many more).
However there is no PHYSICAL barrier to prevent it working, neither unwieldly large quantities of nuclear propellants or antimatter stored on board are needed.
2. Alpha Centaurii is rather 4.2 than 12 light years away, but with the propulsion system described above it is of little relevance.
It is ternary (as I remember) system and it is most unlikely, that habitable planet is there. You must go further than that to find one.