Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Resource Wars Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby ernest » Fri 01 Apr 2005, 00:50:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'C')hina and Russia? I don't see it. China and Russia have a long history of animosity towards eachother. Even when they were both communist, they didn't trust eachother. So lets see...my wild guess....How about this.

Axis: US, Canada (as a seperate nation or as the 51st state), Russia, India, Isreal, Turkey, Japan, Phillipeans, Indonesia

vs.

Allies: EU, China, Venezuala, Iran, the stan's, Argentina, most of Africa

Saudi Arabia could go either way. My prediction would be the ouster of the Sauds and joining the allies under an new radical Islamic government.


Interesting take. I see a lot more localized strife, equatorial Africa and northern Africa strongmen knocking each other off for oil revenues, Indonesia continuing to come apart from within, Turkey will definitely ally with western cultures, and China will poach whatever oil it can in the South China Sea from Vietnam, Taiwan and possibly further south.
User avatar
ernest
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat 18 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby formandfile » Fri 01 Apr 2005, 01:44:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ernest', 'S')ome of you guys are such USA haters.


Not really, i just want the current administration to stop spending my Pell grant money. Along with the funds previously earmarked for the National Archives, which caused my girlfriend to be thrown out of a civil service position. To be accurate, im a hater of the current regime

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ernest', 'I')f nothing else, try reading some history instead of spouting the ancient marxist twaddle about America the capitalist monster.


Who mentioned anything about Marx?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ernest', 'T')he notion that America is the bad guy of the world is so hopelessly and stupidly outdated leftist twaddle that it makes me wonder where you guys got your education.


Granted no nation is perfect, it certainly doesnt make saints out of the states. And as of now i see little evidence of this country heading in the right direction with a total lack of a 'plan b' outside of resource wars, so yeah, i would say that places the US firmly in the 'bad guy' category in the eyes of...well, pretty much everyone else in the world.
User avatar
formandfile
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed 17 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Atlanta - GA - USA

Unread postby whereismymonkey » Fri 01 Apr 2005, 03:14:18

20th March 2003, USA
Just a little slow to start off with.
User avatar
whereismymonkey
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 25 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby Teclo » Fri 01 Apr 2005, 09:50:01

China and Russia, guys you need to rethink this

I'm a bit of a news whore so I know the following:

1. They resolved their terrortorial disputes with a long awaited treaty
2. They are conducting joint military exercises
3. Russia is China's main arms supplier

Ideologically Russia under Putin has much in common with China, both authoritarians

Its obvious to me and it should be to you, that its more likely than not, they would form an alliance of some kind

You are talking about old history, of 60's rivalry thats long since over

Teclo
User avatar
Teclo
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat 29 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby jaakkeli » Fri 01 Apr 2005, 10:22:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'C')hina and Russia? I don't see it. China and Russia have a long history of animosity towards eachother. Even when they were both communist, they didn't trust eachother.


Mildly put! There was a bit of war there and a *lot* of weird shit at the border all the time.

China has always considered the border treaties it signed with Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union unfair, something imposed on it at a time of temporary weakness. They have every intention to redictate the terms once they're on the top. It seems more likely that Russia will lose most or even all of its Pacific coast (at least all of the important stretch, ie. the ice-free harbors in the south) to China soon enough.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')xis: US, Canada (as a seperate nation or as the 51st state), Russia, India, Isreal, Turkey, Japan, Phillipeans, Indonesia


Turkey?! WTF?! Why on earth would <i>Turkey</i> ally with the US? Right now it has to be one of the most anti-American countries in the world, if not <i>the</i> most! There would be an instant revolution if any government attempted to ally with the US (or, more likely in Turkey, the military would simply disobery and throw out the government). And Indonesia? Why?! What on earth brings this coalition together? What aims do they have in common?
User avatar
jaakkeli
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu 10 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

THE Resource Wars Thread (merged)

Unread postby thequietkid10 » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 22:55:11

How exactly are we supposed to run an "energy war" anyway? Does anyone have any idea how much energy (oil) it cost to run a war? To move those big bombers, tanks, and ships? I don't, but I imagine it is a ton of oil. It just won't be profitable from an energy standpoint to go to war, with say China. We'd use more energy then we could possibly win.

And if we did go to war, (assuming we don't destroy the planet) we will eventually be fighting with clubs and rocks, because we won't have the energy for anything else. I don't know if you find this funny or not, I do though, maybe its just funny in the context of everything else here. :lol:
User avatar
thequietkid10
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon 20 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Raxozanne » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 00:09:28

Yeah they might realise this and skip all the soldiers and tanks etc and just deploy some nukes instead. Quick and effective...
Hello, my name is Rax. I live in the Amazon jungle with a bunch of women. We are super eco feminists and our favourite passtimes are dangling men by their ankles and discussing peak oil. - apparently
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby gego » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 00:54:41

There were wars long before anyone ever heard of gasoline. These wars were basically over resources, whether it was land or populations of serfs.

History clearly shows that wars are a fact of human existence.

If you are thinking that the US will not have the energy resources to to fight over the remaining oil wells, then may not have considered that during war time, all available resources are taken by the government from the population for the "national good". So get ready to use your ration coupons to claim what small subsistence they allow you. Actually it might be good for the health of the average American to get down to 1000 calories of food a day.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby savethehumans » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 01:46:18

Not worry about going into a resource war?

We're already in one!!!!!

The first of many. Of that, have no doubt. :(
User avatar
savethehumans
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Barbara » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:36:52

The resource war is not about getting oil, but CONTROLLING it. If you control the oil flow, then you can let your friends to live in comfort and leave your enemies to freeze.
And you rule the world.

Who controls oil, will be the real world emperor.
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

Unread postby OilyMon » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:38:41

The first stage of the oil war was: secure more oil...

The second stage of the oil war is: SECURE MORE OIL.

The third stage of the oil war is: If you have oil, you have to fight.
User avatar
OilyMon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 188
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Southern Ontario

Unread postby Doly » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:40:37

It's true that it costs tons of oil to run a war. But there are some big fields still out there, and those tons of oil are a drop in comparison with the production of, say, Saudi Arabia.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby shakespear1 » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 04:01:31

I am not a military analyst but as we can see today in Iraq, IT IS NOT EASY. To secure an oil field or fields, plus pipelines, plus refineries, plus ports etc.. IT IS NOT EASY and something as simple as a person with a belt of explosives can do so much damages that all the nukes in the arsenal will not stop this.

So unless one is willing to apply Machiavelli's Principle to the extreme, YOU WILL NOT WIN.

Don't forget external forces that will not just sit there and watch as someone is rounding up all the resources. In this respect we do not have a uni-polar world. There is the China Axis, India Axis, Pakistan Axis, Russia Axis etc.

Do war on Americans driving those stupid gas guzzlers, build better mass transit such as found in Paris or Moscow. Move business and people closer to the center. Get them used to living in apartments and a little summer home away in the suburbs. ........

That is a War worth fighting. :)
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Resource wars, no pensions, de-electrification...

Unread postby Markos101 » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 19:55:22

youthenasia at 60, financial crisis, no aircraft, no heat in homes, no medicines, no long-haul personal transport, huge numbers of empty houses from excess construction over the past 40 years, no long-distance communication due to de-electrification, business failiures, no steady income sources, less food, no long-distance travel, no growth prospects, social unrest, no feasible nuclear replacement due to need to continuously replace nuclear power plants every 30 years in a declining fossil fuel economy which cannot happen on a continual basis unlimited into the future, no television (not such a bad thing), no computers due to loss of base materials and mass electrification, possibility of loss of remaining reserves through conflict for remaining supplies being destroyed, no plastic, no organic chemistry, no glass, no base metals due to need for oil-based mining, no wood because we've already chopped all the stuff up, no fire(!), no gardens due to need to use land for food, no internet, no fireworks, no trains, no ink pens or inkjet cartridges, no varnish, no refridgeration for food(!) due to need for mass electrification, no nitrogen sources due to no gas, no pesticides due to oil derivative, no fertilisers due to no nitrogen, no paper due to need for oil-based transport for importation (!), no underwear or man-made fibre based clothes, no waterproof clothing, no caravans (due to need for petrol based transportation), no tents (due to need for oil-based man-made fibres), no music due to need for mass electrification (!) - we'll need to play naturally created music again, no top 100 pop music charts, no radio shows, no air conditioning due to need for electrification(!), no solar panels or wind turbines due to need for continous renewal which is impossible on a long-term basis in a declining energy economy and into the arbitrary future, no new books, no candles due to need for oil based parafin, no light (!) at night (!), no radiators, no golf due to need for huge land masses and wastage of resources, no marmite, no new zealand butter, no wine due to lack of transport to countries without the right climate, no bananas, no sweet potatoes, no deodourant due to oil based derivatives making it uneconomic, no anti-perspirants for same reason, no hot bathes or showers (!), no....

Care to continue?

Mark
Last edited by Ferretlover on Sat 07 Mar 2009, 21:56:27, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE Resource Wars Thread.
User avatar
Markos101
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: United Kingdom, Various

Re: Resource wars, no pensions, de-electrification...

Unread postby EnergySpin » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 20:04:31

No Milk Today I guess 8O
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Resource wars, no pensions, de-electrification...

Unread postby whiteknight » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 20:10:59

Come on everybody join in, you know the words!

No phone, no lights, no motor cars, not a single luxury,
like Robinson Carosoe, it's primitive as can be.
So join us here each week my freinds you're sure to get a smile.
From seven strandes castaways, here on Gilligans Isle!
User avatar
whiteknight
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Resource wars, no pensions, de-electrification...

Unread postby Markos101 » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 20:14:10

No batteries, no condoms in an environment where sex will become more popular for entertainment again and compound our population issues, no tyres for any new transport vehicles(!), no paint(!), no hairgel, no hairwax, no digital cameras, no donuts due to need for cooking oil from crude oil, no...
User avatar
Markos101
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: United Kingdom, Various

Re: Resource wars, no pensions, de-electrification...

Unread postby Markos101 » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 20:16:05

tissues, toilet paper, no coins...
User avatar
Markos101
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: United Kingdom, Various

Re: Resource wars, no pensions, de-electrification...

Unread postby doufus » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 20:19:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Markos101', 'y')outhenasia at 60, financial crisis, no aircraft, no heat in homes, no medicines, no long-haul personal transport, huge numbers of empty houses from excess construction over the past 40 years, no long-distance communication due to de-electrification, business failiures, no steady income sources, less food, no long-distance travel, no growth prospects, social unrest, no feasible nuclear replacement due to need to continuously replace nuclear power plants every 30 years in a declining fossil fuel economy which cannot happen on a continual basis unlimited into the future, no television (not such a bad thing), no computers due to loss of base materials and mass electrification, possibility of loss of remaining reserves through conflict for remaining supplies being destroyed, no plastic, no organic chemistry, no glass, no base metals due to need for oil-based mining, no wood because we've already chopped all the stuff up, no fire(!), no gardens due to need to use land for food, no internet, no fireworks, no trains, no ink pens or inkjet cartridges, no varnish, no refridgeration for food(!) due to need for mass electrification, no nitrogen sources due to no gas, no pesticides due to oil derivative, no fertilisers due to no nitrogen, no paper due to need for oil-based transport for importation (!), no underwear or man-made fibre based clothes, no waterproof clothing, no caravans (due to need for petrol based transportation), no tents (due to need for oil-based man-made fibres), no music due to need for mass electrification (!) - we'll need to play naturally created music again, no top 100 pop music charts, no radio shows, no air conditioning due to need for electrification(!), no solar panels or wind turbines due to need for continous renewal which is impossible on a long-term basis in a declining energy economy and into the arbitrary future, no new books, no candles due to need for oil based parafin, no light (!) at night (!), no radiators, no golf due to need for huge land masses and wastage of resources, no marmite, no new zealand butter, no wine due to lack of transport to countries without the right climate, no bananas, no sweet potatoes, no deodourant due to oil based derivatives making it uneconomic, no anti-perspirants for same reason, no hot bathes or showers (!), no....

Care to continue?

Mark



Rubbish. This scenario wold only happen if all energy supplies were
turned off in an eyeblink. PO IF it happens is about decline and adjustment.
I dunno about you but I can't imagine the US NOT getting oil by any
means necessary and let's face it, u guys have used pretty ultimate
means before. Quite a few japanese got a few rads courtesy of Enola
Gay. So the idea that someone turns of US oil so quickly, so completely
that it can't buy it or extort it that you all die in freezing hovels fighting
over the last spud is just preposterous.

Look on the brightside- an M16 will mean free sex for anyone who
still has a bullet.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Resource wars, no pensions, de-electrification...

Unread postby Markos101 » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 20:19:34

...no hot food...
User avatar
Markos101
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: United Kingdom, Various

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron