by yesplease » Fri 06 Jul 2007, 16:18:07
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', 'W')ell I didn't know it was assumed we were only talking about private miles being replaced here, but given that, a 25-30% increase in USA electrical production sounds good to me.
How much of the ~11MB/day oil is the private transport sector compared to commercial though? Changing 200 million cars to EVs and increasing 30% electricity capacity saves what exactly, 4-5MB/day?
It saves something like that. But since gasoline was originally a waste product, and we happened to develop a market for it, the personal automobile, what's the point in saving any of it?

Bidness transport uses relatively little fuel iirc, especially when considering large diesel engines that don't have to adhere to any emissions standards and can use a wide variety of waste products for fuel such as used motor oil, waste vegetable oil, etc... The rest of it goes for heating fuels/asphalt/etc... You can get a good idea of the proportions of finished products from the interwebz.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', 'T')alk about some big changes needed to keep things as they are for just that tiny bit longer...

If by big changes you mean very small changes in vehicle construction that result in significant decreases in pollution while increasing energy efficiency by leaps and bounds, if applied properly, and significantly reducing gasoline consumption. Then sure.
But, why would we want to reduce gasoline consumption. *We've managed to burn through god knows how much gas and finally bump up against the physical extraction constraints. Now is not the time to start introducing alternatives or hyper-efficient vehicles, unless we want to loose out on gobs of cash. Those efficient vehicles will be brought in at a proportional rate compared to the decline curves, so that consumers will continue to pay and not migrate away from gasoline consumption for transport. The great thing as we near peak, is that, combined with environmental concerns, it makes for a great reason not to build more refineries. And any drop in refinery output can serve to gauge how much people will pay so that vehicle efficiency can be adjusted with a fair amount of certainty for the maximum amount of profit.
The best thing I've found, is that there's no reason for using gasoline from the pov of energy. Refineries and wells use electricity and natural gas when extracting and refining oil. On average per gallon of gas, if we used the electricity directly, and burned the natural gas in a power plant, we could get enough electricity at the consumers home to move a EV nearly as far as the amount of gasoline we refine moves an ICE powered vehicle. We are, for all intents and purposes, trading a certain amount of relatively clean useful energy that does ~X amount of work, for more energy that isn't nearly as clean, and still does ~X amount of work because it's used in a relatively inefficient manner.
Oil isn't about energy. It's about money. We have so much energy we don't know what to do with it. If a light bulb were as inefficient, not only in the thermodynamic sense, but in the utilitarian sense, as a car, we'd use 10,000W to light a single room. We're not running out of oil, we're wasting it as quickly as possible. Because if something else comes along and displaces it, all those barrels are worth next to nothing.
*And by we I mean the auto makers, oil barons, and financial brokers between them.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!