by Auntie_Cipation » Wed 05 Aug 2009, 01:22:04
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ClassicSpiderman', 'A')s for the hobo in question--I admire and even envy him a little bit. But I like having toilet paper, flush toilets, plumbing, a gym and all sorts of other good stuff that makes my life easy and comfortable.
Yeah, the age of cheap oil and growth capitalism produced lots of creature comforts for the [relatively] wealthy of the planet (ie all of us who have things like refrigeration, fresh fruit in the off-season, personal automobiles and computers, and more than three or four changes of clothing for each season), and who could blame any of us for 'liking' those comforts? (That's why they call them 'comforts', duh.)
However.
When one considers the harm that is being done by the creation and maintenance of those comforts --
harm that ranges from -- to use your flush toilet example -- water pollution and loss of soil nutrients (both effects of flushing our bodily wastes into our clean water system)
to social justice issues such as child labor, sweathouses, farmworkers being unwittingly exposed to toxins being used as pesticides/herbicides,
and when one further considers that the cheap oil era which allowed [some of] us to have these things at such miniscule cost in the first place is a finite and unsustainable system which happens to be reaching its apogee and is thence on its way out in any case --
Well, when all those things are factored in, it just seems unfathomably, abominably, disgustingly greedy, selfish, and unethical (not to mention stupid in the sense of not giving oneself a chance to adapt and adjust on a somewhat comfortable timeline) to allow our 'like' of those things to actually decide whether we resist powerdown versus welcome it and encourage it to come ASAP.
"... among the ways available in which a man can die, it is a rare and signal distinction to be killed by a leopard."
-- Raymond Dasmann